-
The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Jackson Levi Said,
Adam Riess,
Agnieszka Pollo,
Vivian Poulin,
Adrià Gómez-Valent,
Amanda Weltman,
Antonella Palmese,
Caroline D. Huang,
Carsten van de Bruck,
Chandra Shekhar Saraf,
Cheng-Yu Kuo,
Cora Uhlemann,
Daniela Grandón,
Dante Paz,
Dominique Eckert,
Elsa M. Teixeira,
Emmanuel N. Saridakis,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Florian Beutler,
Florian Niedermann,
Francesco Bajardi,
Gabriela Barenboim,
Giulia Gubitosi,
Ilaria Musella
, et al. (513 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-t…
▽ More
The standard model of cosmology has provided a good phenomenological description of a wide range of observations both at astrophysical and cosmological scales for several decades. This concordance model is constructed by a universal cosmological constant and supported by a matter sector described by the standard model of particle physics and a cold dark matter contribution, as well as very early-time inflationary physics, and underpinned by gravitation through general relativity. There have always been open questions about the soundness of the foundations of the standard model. However, recent years have shown that there may also be questions from the observational sector with the emergence of differences between certain cosmological probes. In this White Paper, we identify the key objectives that need to be addressed over the coming decade together with the core science projects that aim to meet these challenges. These discordances primarily rest on the divergence in the measurement of core cosmological parameters with varying levels of statistical confidence. These possible statistical tensions may be partially accounted for by systematics in various measurements or cosmological probes but there is also a growing indication of potential new physics beyond the standard model. After reviewing the principal probes used in the measurement of cosmological parameters, as well as potential systematics, we discuss the most promising array of potential new physics that may be observable in upcoming surveys. We also discuss the growing set of novel data analysis approaches that go beyond traditional methods to test physical models. [Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2025; v1 submitted 2 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Neutrino cosmology after DESI: tightest mass upper limits, preference for the normal ordering, and tension with terrestrial observations
Authors:
Jun-Qian Jiang,
William Giarè,
Stefano Gariazzo,
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Olga Mena,
Davide Pedrotti,
Simony Santos da Costa,
Sunny Vagnozzi
Abstract:
The recent DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurements have led to tight upper limits on the neutrino mass sum, potentially in tension with oscillation constraints requiring $\sum m_ν \gtrsim 0.06\,{\text{eV}}$. Under the physically motivated assumption of positive $\sum m_ν$, we study the extent to which these limits are tightened by adding other available cosmological probes, and robustly quan…
▽ More
The recent DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurements have led to tight upper limits on the neutrino mass sum, potentially in tension with oscillation constraints requiring $\sum m_ν \gtrsim 0.06\,{\text{eV}}$. Under the physically motivated assumption of positive $\sum m_ν$, we study the extent to which these limits are tightened by adding other available cosmological probes, and robustly quantify the preference for the normal mass ordering over the inverted one, as well as the tension between cosmological and terrestrial data. Combining DESI data with Cosmic Microwave Background measurements and several late-time background probes, the tightest $2σ$ limit we find without including a local $H_0$ prior is $\sum m_ν<0.05\,{\text{eV}}$. This leads to a strong preference for the normal ordering, with Bayes factor relative to the inverted one of $46.5$. Depending on the dataset combination and tension metric adopted, we quantify the tension between cosmological and terrestrial observations as ranging between $2.5σ$ and $5σ$. These results are strenghtened when allowing for a time-varying dark energy component with equation of state lying in the physically motivated non-phantom regime, $w(z) \geq -1$, highlighting an interesting synergy between the nature of dark energy and laboratory probes of the mass ordering. If these tensions persist and cannot be attributed to systematics, either or both standard neutrino (particle) physics or the underlying cosmological model will have to be questioned.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2025; v1 submitted 25 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
Does DESI 2024 Confirm $Λ$CDM?
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Dejan Stojkovic
Abstract:
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI cons…
▽ More
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI constraints allow $Ω_m$ to wiggle at the $\sim 2 σ$ level with increasing effective redshift in the $Λ$CDM model. Given that LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ is at odds with Type Ia supernovae in overlapping redshifts, we expect that this anomaly will decrease in statistical significance with future DESI data releases leaving an increasing $Ω_m$ trend with effective redshift at higher redshifts. We estimate the significance of the latter in DESI data at $\sim 1.8 σ$ and comment on how it dovetails with independent observations. It is imperative to understand what makes DESI LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ an outlier when it comes to $Ω_m$ determinations.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
The Scavenger Hunt for Quasar Samples to Be Used as Cosmological Tools
Authors:
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Giada Bargiacchi,
Aleksander Łukasz Lenart,
Salvatore Capozziello
Abstract:
Although the $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter model is the most accredited cosmological model, information at high redshifts ($z$) between type Ia supernovae ($z=2.26$) and the Cosmic Microwave Background ($z=1100$) is crucial to validate this model further. To this end, we have discovered a sample of 1132 quasars up to $z=7.54$ exhibiting a reduced intrinsic dispersion of the relation between ultraviolet and…
▽ More
Although the $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter model is the most accredited cosmological model, information at high redshifts ($z$) between type Ia supernovae ($z=2.26$) and the Cosmic Microwave Background ($z=1100$) is crucial to validate this model further. To this end, we have discovered a sample of 1132 quasars up to $z=7.54$ exhibiting a reduced intrinsic dispersion of the relation between ultraviolet and X-ray fluxes, $δ_\mathrm{F}=0.22$ vs. $δ_\mathrm{F}=0.29$ ($24\%$ less), than the original sample. This gold sample, once we correct the luminosities for selection biases and redshift evolution, enables us to determine the matter density parameter $Ω_M$ with a precision of 0.09. Unprecedentedly, this quasar sample is the only one that, as a standalone cosmological probe, yields such tight constraints on $Ω_M$ while being drawn from the same parent population of the initial sample.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Putting Flat $Λ$CDM In The (Redshift) Bin
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Rance Solomon,
Maria G. Dainotti,
Dejan Stojkovic
Abstract:
Flat $Λ$CDM cosmology is specified by two constant fitting parameters at the background level in the late Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$ and matter density (today) $Ω_m$. Mathematically, $H_0$ and $Ω_m$ are either integration constants arising from solving ordinary differential equations or are directly related to integration constants. Seen in this context, if fits of the $Λ$CDM model to cos…
▽ More
Flat $Λ$CDM cosmology is specified by two constant fitting parameters at the background level in the late Universe, the Hubble constant $H_0$ and matter density (today) $Ω_m$. Mathematically, $H_0$ and $Ω_m$ are either integration constants arising from solving ordinary differential equations or are directly related to integration constants. Seen in this context, if fits of the $Λ$CDM model to cosmological probes at different redshifts lead to different $(H_0, Ω_m)$ parameters, this is a mismatch between mathematics and observation. Here, in mock observational Hubble data (OHD) (geometric probes of expansion history) we demonstrate evolution in distributions of best fit parameters with effective redshift. As a result, considerably different $(H_0, Ω_m)$ best fits from Planck-$Λ$CDM cannot be precluded in high redshift bins. We explore if OHD, Type Ia supernovae and standardisable quasar samples exhibit redshift evolution of best fit $Λ$CDM parameters. In all samples, we confirm a decreasing $H_0$ and increasing $Ω_m$ trend with increasing bin redshift. Through comparison with mocks, we confirm that similar behaviour can arise randomly within the flat $Λ$CDM model with probabilities as low as $p = 0.0021$ ($3.1 \, σ$). We present complementary profile distribution analysis confirming the shifts in cosmological parameters in high redshift bins. In particular, we identify a redshift range where Planck $(H_0, Ω_m)$ values are disfavoured at $99.6 \%$ ($2.9 σ$) confidence level in a combination of OHD and supernovae data.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2024; v1 submitted 22 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Revealing Intrinsic Flat $Λ$CDM Biases with Standardizable Candles
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Rance Solomon,
Giada Bargiacchi,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Dejan Stojkovic
Abstract:
Emerging high redshift cosmological probes, in particular quasars (QSOs), show a preference for larger matter densities, $Ω_{m} \approx 1$, within the flat $Λ$CDM framework. Here, using the Risaliti-Lusso relation for standardizable QSOs, we demonstrate that the QSOs recover the \textit{same} Planck-$Λ$CDM Universe as Type Ia supernovae (SN), $Ω_m \approx 0.3$ at lower redshifts…
▽ More
Emerging high redshift cosmological probes, in particular quasars (QSOs), show a preference for larger matter densities, $Ω_{m} \approx 1$, within the flat $Λ$CDM framework. Here, using the Risaliti-Lusso relation for standardizable QSOs, we demonstrate that the QSOs recover the \textit{same} Planck-$Λ$CDM Universe as Type Ia supernovae (SN), $Ω_m \approx 0.3$ at lower redshifts $ 0 < z \lesssim 0.7$, before transitioning to an Einstein-de Sitter Universe ($Ω_m =1$) at higher redshifts $z \gtrsim 1$. We illustrate the same trend, namely increasing $Ω_{m}$ and decreasing $H_0$ with redshift, in SN but poor statistics prevent a definitive statement. We explain physically why the trend is expected in the flat $Λ$CDM cosmology, illustrate the intrinsic bias and non-Gaussian tails with mock Pantheon data, and identify a similar trend in BAO below $z=1$. Our results highlight an intrinsic bias in the flat $Λ$CDM Universe, whereby $Ω_m$ increases, $H_0$ decreases and $S_8$ increases with effective redshift, thus providing a new perspective on $Λ$CDM tensions; even in a Planck-$Λ$CDM Universe the current tensions might have been expected.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2022; v1 submitted 20 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
