-
Light sterile neutrino sensitivity at the nuSTORM facility
Authors:
D. Adey,
S. K. Agarwalla,
C. M. Ankenbrandt,
R. Asfandiyarov,
J. J. Back,
G. Barker,
E. Baussan,
R. Bayes,
S. Bhadra,
V. Blackmore,
A. Blondel,
S. A. Bogacz,
C. Booth,
S. B. Boyd,
S. G. Bramsiepe,
A. Bravar,
S. J. Brice,
A. D. Bross,
F. Cadoux,
H. Cease,
A. Cervera,
J. Cobb,
D. Colling,
P. Coloma,
L. Coney
, et al. (87 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A facility that can deliver beams of electron and muon neutrinos from the decay of a stored muon beam has the potential to unambiguously resolve the issue of the evidence for light sterile neutrinos that arises in short-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments and from estimates of the effective number of neutrino flavors from fits to cosmological data. In this paper, we show that the nuSTORM fac…
▽ More
A facility that can deliver beams of electron and muon neutrinos from the decay of a stored muon beam has the potential to unambiguously resolve the issue of the evidence for light sterile neutrinos that arises in short-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments and from estimates of the effective number of neutrino flavors from fits to cosmological data. In this paper, we show that the nuSTORM facility, with stored muons of 3.8 GeV/c $\pm$ 10%, will be able to carry out a conclusive muon neutrino appearance search for sterile neutrinos and test the LSND and MiniBooNE experimental signals with 10$σ$ sensitivity, even assuming conservative estimates for the systematic uncertainties. This experiment would add greatly to our knowledge of the contribution of light sterile neutrinos to the number of effective neutrino flavors from the abundance of primordial helium production and from constraints on neutrino energy density from the cosmic microwave background. The appearance search is complemented by a simultaneous muon neutrino disappearance analysis that will facilitate tests of various sterile neutrino models.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
-
Neutrinos from Stored Muons nuSTORM: Expression of Interest
Authors:
D. Adey,
S. K. Agarwalla,
C. M. Ankenbrandt,
R. Asfandiyarov,
J. J. Back,
G. Barker,
E. Baussan,
R. Bayes,
S. Bhadra,
V. Blackmore,
A. Blondel,
S. A. Bogacz,
C. Booth,
S. B. Boyd,
A. Bravar,
S. J. Brice,
A. D. Bross,
F. Cadoux,
H. Cease,
A. Cervera,
J. Cobb,
D. Colling,
L. Coney,
A. Dobbs,
J. Dobson
, et al. (84 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The nuSTORM facility has been designed to deliver beams of electron and muon neutrinos from the decay of a stored muon beam with a central momentum of 3.8 GeV/c and a momentum spread of 10%. The facility is unique in that it will: serve the future long- and short-baseline neutrino-oscillation programmes by providing definitive measurements of electron-neutrino- and muon-neutrino-nucleus cross sect…
▽ More
The nuSTORM facility has been designed to deliver beams of electron and muon neutrinos from the decay of a stored muon beam with a central momentum of 3.8 GeV/c and a momentum spread of 10%. The facility is unique in that it will: serve the future long- and short-baseline neutrino-oscillation programmes by providing definitive measurements of electron-neutrino- and muon-neutrino-nucleus cross sections with percent-level precision; allow searches for sterile neutrinos of exquisite sensitivity to be carried out; and constitute the essential first step in the incremental development of muon accelerators as a powerful new technique for particle physics.
Of the world's proton-accelerator laboratories, only CERN and FNAL have the infrastructure required to mount nuSTORM. Since no siting decision has yet been taken, the purpose of this Expression of Interest (EoI) is to request the resources required to: investigate in detail how nuSTORM could be implemented at CERN; and develop options for decisive European contributions to the nuSTORM facility and experimental programme wherever the facility is sited.
The EoI defines a two-year programme culminating in the delivery of a Technical Design Report.
△ Less
Submitted 7 May, 2013;
originally announced May 2013.
-
Interim Design Report
Authors:
R. J. Abrams,
S. K. Agarwalla,
A. Alekou,
C. Andreopoulos,
C. M. Ankenbrandt,
S. Antusch,
M. Apollonio,
M. Aslaninejad,
J. Back,
P. Ballett,
G. Barker,
K. B. Beard,
E. Benedetto,
J. R. J. Bennett,
J. S. Berg,
S. Bhattacharya,
V. Blackmore,
M. Blennow,
A. Blondel,
A. Bogacz,
M. Bonesini,
C. Bontoiu,
C. Booth,
C. Bromberg,
S. J. Brooks
, et al. (111 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the ninth "International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams" which was held in Okayama in August 2007. The IDS-NF mandate is to deliver the Reference Design Report (RDR) for the facility on the timescale of 2012/13. In addition, the mandate for the study [3] requires a…
▽ More
The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (the IDS-NF) was established by the community at the ninth "International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, super-beams, and beta- beams" which was held in Okayama in August 2007. The IDS-NF mandate is to deliver the Reference Design Report (RDR) for the facility on the timescale of 2012/13. In addition, the mandate for the study [3] requires an Interim Design Report to be delivered midway through the project as a step on the way to the RDR. This document, the IDR, has two functions: it marks the point in the IDS-NF at which the emphasis turns to the engineering studies required to deliver the RDR and it documents baseline concepts for the accelerator complex, the neutrino detectors, and the instrumentation systems. The IDS-NF is, in essence, a site-independent study. Example sites, CERN, FNAL, and RAL, have been identified to allow site-specific issues to be addressed in the cost analysis that will be presented in the RDR. The choice of example sites should not be interpreted as implying a preferred choice of site for the facility.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2011;
originally announced December 2011.
