-
A Linear Collider Vision for the Future of Particle Physics
Authors:
H. Abramowicz,
E. Adli,
F. Alharthi,
M. Almanza-Soto,
M. M. Altakach,
S Ampudia Castelazo,
D. Angal-Kalinin,
R. B. Appleby,
O. Apsimon,
A. Arbey,
O. Arquero,
A. Aryshev,
S. Asai,
D. Attié,
J. L. Avila-Jimenez,
H. Baer,
J. A. Bagger,
Y. Bai,
I. R. Bailey,
C. Balazs,
T Barklow,
J. Baudot,
P. Bechtle,
T. Behnke,
A. B. Bellerive
, et al. (391 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we review the physics opportunities at linear $e^+e^-$ colliders with a special focus on high centre-of-mass energies and beam polarisation, take a fresh look at the various accelerator technologies available or under development and, for the first time, discuss how a facility first equipped with a technology mature today could be upgraded with technologies of tomorrow to reach much…
▽ More
In this paper we review the physics opportunities at linear $e^+e^-$ colliders with a special focus on high centre-of-mass energies and beam polarisation, take a fresh look at the various accelerator technologies available or under development and, for the first time, discuss how a facility first equipped with a technology mature today could be upgraded with technologies of tomorrow to reach much higher energies and/or luminosities. In addition, we will discuss detectors and alternative collider modes, as well as opportunities for beyond-collider experiments and R\&D facilities as part of a linear collider facility (LCF). The material of this paper will support all plans for $e^+e^-$ linear colliders and additional opportunities they offer, independently of technology choice or proposed site, as well as R\&D for advanced accelerator technologies. This joint perspective on the physics goals, early technologies and upgrade strategies has been developed by the LCVision team based on an initial discussion at LCWS2024 in Tokyo and a follow-up at the LCVision Community Event at CERN in January 2025. It heavily builds on decades of achievements of the global linear collider community, in particular in the context of CLIC and ILC.
△ Less
Submitted 31 March, 2025; v1 submitted 25 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
The International Linear Collider: Report to Snowmass 2021
Authors:
Alexander Aryshev,
Ties Behnke,
Mikael Berggren,
James Brau,
Nathaniel Craig,
Ayres Freitas,
Frank Gaede,
Spencer Gessner,
Stefania Gori,
Christophe Grojean,
Sven Heinemeyer,
Daniel Jeans,
Katja Kruger,
Benno List,
Jenny List,
Zhen Liu,
Shinichiro Michizono,
David W. Miller,
Ian Moult,
Hitoshi Murayama,
Tatsuya Nakada,
Emilio Nanni,
Mihoko Nojiri,
Hasan Padamsee,
Maxim Perelstein
, et al. (487 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The International Linear Collider (ILC) is on the table now as a new global energy-frontier accelerator laboratory taking data in the 2030s. The ILC addresses key questions for our current understanding of particle physics. It is based on a proven accelerator technology. Its experiments will challenge the Standard Model of particle physics and will provide a new window to look beyond it. This docu…
▽ More
The International Linear Collider (ILC) is on the table now as a new global energy-frontier accelerator laboratory taking data in the 2030s. The ILC addresses key questions for our current understanding of particle physics. It is based on a proven accelerator technology. Its experiments will challenge the Standard Model of particle physics and will provide a new window to look beyond it. This document brings the story of the ILC up to date, emphasizing its strong physics motivation, its readiness for construction, and the opportunity it presents to the US and the global particle physics community.
△ Less
Submitted 16 January, 2023; v1 submitted 14 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Combined Analysis of all Three Phases of Solar Neutrino Data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Authors:
SNO Collaboration,
B. Aharmim,
S. N. Ahmed,
A. E. Anthony,
N. Barros,
E. W. Beier,
A. Bellerive,
B. Beltran,
M. Bergevin,
S. D. Biller,
K. Boudjemline,
M. G. Boulay,
B. Cai,
Y. D. Chan,
D. Chauhan,
M. Chen,
B. T. Cleveland,
G. A. Cox,
X. Dai,
H. Deng,
J. A. Detwiler,
M. DiMarco,
P. J. Doe,
G. Doucas,
P. -L. Drouin
, et al. (99 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report results from a combined analysis of solar neutrino data from all phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. By exploiting particle identification information obtained from the proportional counters installed during the third phase, this analysis improved background rejection in that phase of the experiment. The combined analysis resulted in a total flux of active neutrino flavors from 8…
▽ More
We report results from a combined analysis of solar neutrino data from all phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory. By exploiting particle identification information obtained from the proportional counters installed during the third phase, this analysis improved background rejection in that phase of the experiment. The combined analysis resulted in a total flux of active neutrino flavors from 8B decays in the Sun of (5.25 \pm 0.16(stat.)+0.11-0.13(syst.))\times10^6 cm^{-2}s^{-1}. A two-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (5.6^{+1.9}_{-1.4})\times10^{-5} eV^2 and tan^2θ_{12}= 0.427^{+0.033}_{-0.029}. A three-flavor neutrino oscillation analysis combining this result with results of all other solar neutrino experiments and the KamLAND experiment yielded \Deltam^2_{21} = (7.41^{+0.21}_{-0.19})\times10^{-5} eV^2, tan^2θ_{12} = 0.446^{+0.030}_{-0.029}, and sin^2θ_{13} = (2.5^{+1.8}_{-1.5})\times10^{-2}. This implied an upper bound of sin^2θ_{13} < 0.053 at the 95% confidence level (C.L.).
△ Less
Submitted 4 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
