Combined Annual Modulation Dark Matter Search with COSINE-100 and ANAIS-112
Authors:
N. Carlin,
J. Y. Cho,
J. J. Choi,
S. Choi,
A. C. Ezeribe,
L. E. França,
C. Ha,
I. S. Hahn,
S. J. Hollick,
S. B. Hong,
E. J. Jeon,
H. W. Joo,
W. G. Kang,
M. Kauer,
B. H. Kim,
H. J. Kim,
J. Kim,
K. W. Kim,
S. H. Kim,
S. K. Kim,
W. K. Kim,
Y. D. Kim,
Y. H. Kim,
Y. J. Ko,
D. H. Lee
, et al. (49 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The annual modulation signal, claimed to be consistent with dark matter as observed by DAMA/LIBRA in a sodium-iodide based detector, has persisted for over two decades. COSINE-100 and ANAIS-112 were designed to test the claim directly using the same target material. COSINE-100, located at Yangyang Underground Laboratory in South Korea, and ANAIS-112, located at Canfranc Underground Laboratory in S…
▽ More
The annual modulation signal, claimed to be consistent with dark matter as observed by DAMA/LIBRA in a sodium-iodide based detector, has persisted for over two decades. COSINE-100 and ANAIS-112 were designed to test the claim directly using the same target material. COSINE-100, located at Yangyang Underground Laboratory in South Korea, and ANAIS-112, located at Canfranc Underground Laboratory in Spain, have been taking data since 2016 and 2017, respectively. Each experiment published its respective results independently. In this paper, we present the results of an annual modulation search as a test of the signal observed by DAMA/LIBRA with the first three respective years of data from COSINE-100 and ANAIS-112. Using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, we find best fit values for modulation amplitude of $-0.0002 {\pm} 0.0026$ cpd/kg/keV in the 1-6 keV and $0.0021 {\pm} 0.0028$ cpd/kg/keV in the 2-6 keV energy regions. These results are not compatible with DAMA/LIBRA's assertion for their observation of annual modulation at $3.7σ$ and $2.6σ$, respectively. Performing a simple combination of the newly released 6-years datasets from both experiments find values consistent with no modulation at $0.0005 {\pm} 0.0019$ cpd/kg/keV in the 1-6 keV and $0.0027 {\pm} 0.0021$ cpd/kg/keV in the 2-6 keV energy regions with $4.68σ$ and $3.53σ$ respective exclusions of the DAMA/LIBRA signal.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
Towards a robust model-independent test of the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter signal: ANAIS-112 results with six years of data
Authors:
Julio Amaré,
Jaime Apilluelo,
Susana Cebrián,
David Cintas,
Iván Coarasa,
Eduardo García,
María Martínez,
Ysrael Ortigoza,
Alfonso Ortiz de Solórzano,
Tamara Pardo,
Jorge Puimedón,
María Luisa Sarsa,
Carmen Seoane
Abstract:
The nature of dark matter, which constitutes 27% of the Universe's matter-energy content, remains one of the most challenging open questions in physics. Over the past two decades, the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has reported an annual modulation in the detection rate of $\approx$250 kg of NaI(Tl) detectors operated at the Gran Sasso Laboratory, which the collaboration interprets as evidence of the galac…
▽ More
The nature of dark matter, which constitutes 27% of the Universe's matter-energy content, remains one of the most challenging open questions in physics. Over the past two decades, the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has reported an annual modulation in the detection rate of $\approx$250 kg of NaI(Tl) detectors operated at the Gran Sasso Laboratory, which the collaboration interprets as evidence of the galactic dark matter detection. However, this claim has not been independently confirmed and is refuted under certain dark matter particle and halo model scenarios. Therefore, it is crucial to perform an experiment with the same target material. The ANAIS experiment uses 112.5 kg of NaI(Tl) detectors at the Canfranc Underground Laboratory and it has been collecting data since August 2017 to model-independently test the DAMA/LIBRA result. This article presents the results of the annual modulation analysis corresponding to six years of ANAIS-112 data. Our results, the most sensitive to date with the same target material, NaI(Tl), are incompatible with the DAMA/LIBRA modulation signal at a 4$σ$ confidence level. Such a discrepancy strongly challenges the DAMA/LIBRA dark matter interpretation and highlights the need to address systematic uncertainties affecting the comparison, particularly those related to the response of detectors to nuclear recoils, which may require further characterization of the DAMA crystals.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2025;
originally announced February 2025.
