Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Rock, S

Measurements of the Separated Longitudinal Structure Function F_L from Hydrogen and Deuterium Targets at Low Q^2

Authors: V. Tvaskis, A. Tvaskis, I. Niculescu, D. Abbott, G. S. Adams, A. Afanasev, A. Ahmidouch, T. Angelescu, J. Arrington, R. Asaturyan, S. Avery, O. K. Baker, N. Benmouna, B. L. Berman, A. Biselli, H. P. Blok, W. U. Boeglin, P. E. Bosted, E. Brash, H. Breuer, G. Chang, N. Chant, M. E. Christy, S. H. Connell, M. M. Dalton , et al. (78 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Structure functions, as measured in lepton-nucleon scattering, have proven to be very useful in studying the quark dynamics within the nucleon. However, it is experimentally difficult to separately determine the longitudinal and transverse structure functions, and consequently there are substantially less data available for the longitudinal structure function in particular. Here we present separat… ▽ More Structure functions, as measured in lepton-nucleon scattering, have proven to be very useful in studying the quark dynamics within the nucleon. However, it is experimentally difficult to separately determine the longitudinal and transverse structure functions, and consequently there are substantially less data available for the longitudinal structure function in particular. Here we present separated structure functions for hydrogen and deuterium at low four--momentum transfer squared, Q^2< 1 GeV^2, and compare these with parton distribution parameterizations and a k_T factorization approach. While differences are found, the parameterizations generally agree with the data even at the very low Q^2 scale of the data. The deuterium data show a smaller longitudinal structure function, and smaller ratio of longitudinal to transverse cross section R, than the proton. This suggests either an unexpected difference in R for the proton and neutron or a suppression of the gluonic distribution in nuclei. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.

Comments: 11 pages, 7 figures, 2 data tables

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. C 97, 045204 (2018)

Neutral Pion Electroproduction in the Resonance Region at High $Q^2$

Authors: A. N. Villano, P. Stoler, P. E. Bosted, S. H. Connell, M. M. Dalton, M. K. Jones, V. Kubarovsky, G. S Adams, A. Ahmidouch, J. Arrington, R. Asaturyan, O. K. Baker, H. Breuer, M. E. Christy, S. Danagoulian, D. Day, J. A. Dunne, D. Dutta, R. Ent, H. C. Fenker, V. V. Frolov, L. Gan, D. Gaskell, W. Hinton, R. J. Holt , et al. (33 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The process $ep \to e^{\prime}p^{\prime}π^0$ has been measured at $Q^2$ = 6.4 and 7.7 GeV/c$^2$)$^2$ in Jefferson Lab's Hall C. Unpolarized differential cross sections are reported in the virtual photon-proton center of mass frame considering the process $γ^{\ast}p \to p^{\prime}π^0$. Various details relating to the background subtractions, radiative corrections and systematic errors are discuss… ▽ More The process $ep \to e^{\prime}p^{\prime}π^0$ has been measured at $Q^2$ = 6.4 and 7.7 GeV/c$^2$)$^2$ in Jefferson Lab's Hall C. Unpolarized differential cross sections are reported in the virtual photon-proton center of mass frame considering the process $γ^{\ast}p \to p^{\prime}π^0$. Various details relating to the background subtractions, radiative corrections and systematic errors are discussed. The usefulness of the data with regard to the measurement of the electromagnetic properties of the well known $Δ(1232)$ resonance is covered in detail. Specifically considered are the electromagnetic and scalar-magnetic ratios $R_{EM}$ and $R_{SM}$ along with the magnetic transition form factor $G_M^{\ast}$. It is found that the rapid fall off of the $Δ(1232)$ contribution continues into this region of momentum transfer and that other resonances △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2009; v1 submitted 15 June, 2009; originally announced June 2009.

Comments: 41 pages including numerical cross section tables, updates include new phenomenological fit for multipole extraction in addition to simplified previous method, These fits are seen in figures 24,26 and 27 and the values are reported in Table VIII

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.C80:035203,2009

Electroproduction of Eta Mesons in the S11(1535) Resonance Region at High Momentum Transfer

Authors: M. M. Dalton, G. S. Adams, A. Ahmidouch, T. Angelescu, J. Arrington, R. Asaturyan, O. K. Baker, N. Benmouna, C. Bertoncini, W. U. Boeglin, P. E. Bosted, H. Breuer, M. E. Christy, S. H. Connell, Y. Cui, S. Danagoulian, D. Day, T. Dodario, J. A. Dunne, D. Dutta, N. El Khayari, R. Ent, H. C. Fenker, V. V. Frolov, L. Gan , et al. (53 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The differential cross-section for the process p(e,e'p)eta has been measured at Q2 ~ 5.7 and 7.0 (GeV/c)2 for centre-of-mass energies from threshold to 1.8 GeV, encompassing the S11(1535) resonance, which dominates the channel. This is the highest momentum transfer measurement of this exclusive process to date. The helicity-conserving transition amplitude A_1/2, for the production of the S11(153… ▽ More The differential cross-section for the process p(e,e'p)eta has been measured at Q2 ~ 5.7 and 7.0 (GeV/c)2 for centre-of-mass energies from threshold to 1.8 GeV, encompassing the S11(1535) resonance, which dominates the channel. This is the highest momentum transfer measurement of this exclusive process to date. The helicity-conserving transition amplitude A_1/2, for the production of the S11(1535) resonance, is extracted from the data. Within the limited Q2 now measured, this quantity appears to begin scaling as 1/Q3 - a predicted, but not definitive, signal of the dominance of perturbative QCD, at Q2 ~ 5 (GeV/c)2. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2009; v1 submitted 22 April, 2008; originally announced April 2008.

Comments: LaTeX, 30 pages, 29 figures, uses longtable.sty, slashbox.sty, ifthen.sty; (v2) corrected figure inclusions; (v3) changes in filenames for prc and added Report-no; (v4) correction based on comments from referee {small changes to abstract and conclusion, inserted figure 9, other small changes to the text} (v5) very minor additions to improve clarity

Report number: JLAB-PHY-08-817

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.C80:015205,2009

Measuring the Phases of G_E and G_M of the Nucleon

Authors: Stephen Rock

Abstract: The nucleon electromagnetic form factors G_E and G_M are complex quantities in the time-like region. The absolute values can be determined by measuring the angular distribution of the nucleons in e^+ e^- --> N N-bar. The complex phase can only be determined by measuring one or more polarizations of the initial or final state. For PEP-N, we can use unpolarized e+ and e- and measure the polarizati… ▽ More The nucleon electromagnetic form factors G_E and G_M are complex quantities in the time-like region. The absolute values can be determined by measuring the angular distribution of the nucleons in e^+ e^- --> N N-bar. The complex phase can only be determined by measuring one or more polarizations of the initial or final state. For PEP-N, we can use unpolarized e+ and e- and measure the polarization of one of the outgoing nucleons. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2001; originally announced June 2001.

Comments: e+e- Physics at Intermediate Energies Workshop Contribution W14

Journal ref: eConf C010430 (2001) W14

Ratio of Electron Scattering from Nuclei to Deuterium at low x and low Momentum Transfer

Authors: Stephen Rock, Peter Bosted

Abstract: We have extracted ratios of cross sections for scattering electrons from high mass targets compared to low mass targets in the region of x ~ 0.02 and Q^2 < 1 (GeV/c)^2 from SLAC experiments performed over the past three decades. Additional analysis was needed for radiative corrections, target end caps and calibration runs. We observe no significant difference in the nuclear ratio for low Q^2 com… ▽ More We have extracted ratios of cross sections for scattering electrons from high mass targets compared to low mass targets in the region of x ~ 0.02 and Q^2 < 1 (GeV/c)^2 from SLAC experiments performed over the past three decades. Additional analysis was needed for radiative corrections, target end caps and calibration runs. We observe no significant difference in the nuclear ratio for low Q^2 compared to results at Q^2 > 1. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2000; originally announced March 2000.

Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures, 3 tables