Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Lyons, L

How to Incorporate Systematic Effects into Parameter Determination

Authors: David van Dyk, Louis Lyons

Abstract: We describe two different approaches for incorporating systematics into analyses for parameter determination in the physical sciences. We refer to these as the Pragmatic and the Full methods, with the latter coming in two variants: Full Likelihood and Fully Bayesian. By the use of a simple and readily understood example, we point out the advantage of using the Full Likelihood and Fully Bayesian ap… ▽ More We describe two different approaches for incorporating systematics into analyses for parameter determination in the physical sciences. We refer to these as the Pragmatic and the Full methods, with the latter coming in two variants: Full Likelihood and Fully Bayesian. By the use of a simple and readily understood example, we point out the advantage of using the Full Likelihood and Fully Bayesian approaches; a more realistic example from Astrophysics is also presented. This could be relevant for data analyses in a wide range of scientific fields, for situations where systematic effects need to be incorporated in the analysis procedure. This note is an extension of part of the talk by van Dyk at the PHYSTAT-Systematics meeting. △ Less

Submitted 8 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 16 pages, 4 figures

PHYSTAT$ν$ at CERN (January 2019)

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: A short overview is provided of the recent PHYSTAT$ν$ meeting at CERN, which dealt with statistical issues relevant for neutrino experiments. A short overview is provided of the recent PHYSTAT$ν$ meeting at CERN, which dealt with statistical issues relevant for neutrino experiments. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Comments: Talk delivered at NuPhys2018,`Prospects in Neutrino Physics', Cavendish Conference Centre, London, UK, December 19--21, 2018. 7 pages, 1 figure

A Paradox about Likelihood Ratios?

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: We consider whether the asymptotic distributions for the log-likelihood ratio test statistic are expected to be Gaussian or chi-squared. Two straightforward examples provide insight on the difference. We consider whether the asymptotic distributions for the log-likelihood ratio test statistic are expected to be Gaussian or chi-squared. Two straightforward examples provide insight on the difference. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2017; v1 submitted 2 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Comments: 10 pages, no figures. Version 2 contains a new Section 4, for Gaussian probability densities (Version 1 considered only exponentials)

Summary of the recent PHYSTAT-$ν$ Workshops

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: This is a summary of the recent PHYSTAT-$ν$ Workshops in Japan and at Fermilab, on `Statistical Issues in Experimental Neutrino Physics'. This is a summary of the recent PHYSTAT-$ν$ Workshops in Japan and at Fermilab, on `Statistical Issues in Experimental Neutrino Physics'. △ Less

Submitted 4 May, 2017; originally announced May 2017.

Comments: Talk presented at NuPhys2016 (London, 12-14 December 2016). 8 pages, LaTeX

Report number: NuPhys2016-Lyons

Combining parameter values or $p$-values

Authors: Louis Lyons, Emilien Chapon

Abstract: We review the methods to combine several measurements, in the form of parameter values or $p$-values. We review the methods to combine several measurements, in the form of parameter values or $p$-values. △ Less

Submitted 18 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: 15 pages, 4 figures

Statistical Issues in Neutrino Physics Analyses

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: Various statistical issues relevant to searches for new physics or to parameter determination in analyses of data in neutrino experiments are briefly discussed. Various statistical issues relevant to searches for new physics or to parameter determination in analyses of data in neutrino experiments are briefly discussed. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: 12 pages, no figures. Talk presented at NuPhys2015 'Prospects in Neutrino Physics', December 2015

Report number: SNSN-323-63

Observation of the rare $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data

Authors: The CMS, LHCb Collaborations, :, V. Khachatryan, A. M. Sirunyan, A. Tumasyan, W. Adam, T. Bergauer, M. Dragicevic, J. Erö, M. Friedl, R. Frühwirth, V. M. Ghete, C. Hartl, N. Hörmann, J. Hrubec, M. Jeitler, W. Kiesenhofer, V. Knünz, M. Krammer, I. Krätschmer, D. Liko, I. Mikulec, D. Rabady, B. Rahbaran , et al. (2807 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six sta… ▽ More A joint measurement is presented of the branching fractions $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ and $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ in proton-proton collisions at the LHC by the CMS and LHCb experiments. The data samples were collected in 2011 at a centre-of-mass energy of 7 TeV, and in 2012 at 8 TeV. The combined analysis produces the first observation of the $B^0_s\toμ^+μ^-$ decay, with a statistical significance exceeding six standard deviations, and the best measurement of its branching fraction so far. Furthermore, evidence for the $B^0\toμ^+μ^-$ decay is obtained with a statistical significance of three standard deviations. The branching fraction measurements are statistically compatible with SM predictions and impose stringent constraints on several theories beyond the SM. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2015; v1 submitted 17 November, 2014; originally announced November 2014.

Comments: Correspondence should be addressed to [email protected]

Report number: CERN-PH-EP-2014-220, CMS-BPH-13-007, LHCb-PAPER-2014-049

Journal ref: Nature 522, 68-72 (04 June 2015)

Statistical Issues in Searches for New Physics

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: Given the cost, both financial and even more importantly in terms of human effort, in building High Energy Physics accelerators and detectors and running them, it is important to use good statistical techniques in analysing data. Some of the statistical issues that arise in searches for New Physics are discussed briefly. They include topics such as: Should we insist on the 5 sigma criterion for… ▽ More Given the cost, both financial and even more importantly in terms of human effort, in building High Energy Physics accelerators and detectors and running them, it is important to use good statistical techniques in analysing data. Some of the statistical issues that arise in searches for New Physics are discussed briefly. They include topics such as: Should we insist on the 5 sigma criterion for discovery claims? The probability of A, given B, is not the same as the probability of B, given A. The meaning of p-values. What is Wilks Theorem and when does it not apply? How should we deal with the `Look Elsewhere Effect'? Dealing with systematics such as background parametrisation. Coverage: What is it and does my method have the correct coverage? The use of p0 versus p1 plots. △ Less

Submitted 5 September, 2014; originally announced September 2014.

Comments: This is the write-up for the Proceedings of a talk delivered at the LHCP2014 Conference at Columbia University, New York in June 2014no diagrams 5 pages long,

Raster scan or 2-D approach?

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: We consider the relative merits of two different approaches to discovery or exclusion of new phenomena, a raster scan or a 2-dimensional approach. We consider the relative merits of two different approaches to discovery or exclusion of new phenomena, a raster scan or a 2-dimensional approach. △ Less

Submitted 29 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures

Discovering the Significance of 5 sigma

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: We discuss the traditional criterion for discovery in Particle Physics of requiring a significance corresponding to at least 5 sigma; and whether a more nuanced approach might be better. We discuss the traditional criterion for discovery in Particle Physics of requiring a significance corresponding to at least 5 sigma; and whether a more nuanced approach might be better. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

Comments: 7 pages

Bayes and Frequentism: a Particle Physicist's perspective

Authors: Louis Lyons

Abstract: In almost every scientific field, an experiment involves collecting data and then analysing it. The analysis stage will often consist in trying to extract some physical parameter and estimating its uncertainty; this is known as Parameter Determination. An example would be the determination of the mass of the top quark, from data collected from high energy proton-proton collisions. A different aim… ▽ More In almost every scientific field, an experiment involves collecting data and then analysing it. The analysis stage will often consist in trying to extract some physical parameter and estimating its uncertainty; this is known as Parameter Determination. An example would be the determination of the mass of the top quark, from data collected from high energy proton-proton collisions. A different aim is to choose between two possible hypotheses. For example, are data on the recession speed s of distant galaxies proportional to their distance d, or do they fit better to a model where the expansion of the Universe is accelerating? There are two fundamental approaches to such statistical analyses - Bayesian and Frequentist. This article discusses the way they differ in their approach to probability, and then goes on to consider how this affects the way they deal with Parameter Determination and Hypothesis Testing. The examples are taken from every-day life and from Particle Physics. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2013; originally announced January 2013.

Search for First-Generation Scalar Leptoquarks in $\bm{p \bar{p}}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=1.96 TeV

Authors: The CDF Collaboration, D. Acosta, J. Adelman, T. Affolder, T. Akimoto, M. G. Albrow, D. Ambrose, S. Amerio, D. Amidei, A. Anastassov, K. Anikeev, A. Annovi, J. Antos, M. Aoki, G. Apollinari, T. Arisawa, J-F. Arguin, A. Artikov, W. Ashmanskas, A. Attal, F. Azfar, P. Azzi-Bacchetta, N. Bacchetta, H. Bachacou, W. Badgett , et al. (605 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We report on a search for pair production of first-generation scalar leptoquarks ($LQ$) in $p \bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=1.96 TeV using an integrated luminosity of 203 $pb^{-1}$ collected at the Fermilab Tevatron collider by the CDF experiment. We observe no evidence for $LQ$ production in the topologies arising from $LQ \bar{LQ} \to eqeq$ and $LQ \bar{LQ} \to eq νq$, and derive 95% C.L.… ▽ More We report on a search for pair production of first-generation scalar leptoquarks ($LQ$) in $p \bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=1.96 TeV using an integrated luminosity of 203 $pb^{-1}$ collected at the Fermilab Tevatron collider by the CDF experiment. We observe no evidence for $LQ$ production in the topologies arising from $LQ \bar{LQ} \to eqeq$ and $LQ \bar{LQ} \to eq νq$, and derive 95% C.L. upper limits on the $LQ$ production cross section. %as a function of $β$, where $β$ is the branching fraction for $LQ \to eq$. The results are combined with those obtained from a separately reported CDF search in the topology arising from $LQ\bar{LQ} \to νq νq$ and 95% C.L. lower limits on the LQ mass as a function of $β= BR(LQ \to eq) $ are derived. The limits are 236, 205 and 145 GeV/c$^2$ for $β$ = 1, $β$ = 0.5 and $β$ = 0.1, respectively. △ Less

Submitted 29 June, 2005; originally announced June 2005.

Comments: submitted to PRL

Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-05-254-E

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D72:051107,2005

Comparison of Three-jet Events in Proton-Antiproton Collisions at Center-of-mass Energy 1.8 TeV to Predictions from a Next-to-leading Order QCD Calculation

Authors: D. Acosta, T. Affolder, M. G. Albrow, D. Ambrose, D. Amidei, K. Anikeev, J. Antos, G. Apollinari, T. Arisawa, A. Artikov, W. Ashmanskas, F. Azfar, P. Azzi-Bacchetta, N. Bacchetta, H. Bachacou, W. Badgett, A. Barbaro-Galtieri, V. E. Barnes, B. A. Barnett, S. Baroiant, M. Barone, G. Bauer, F. Bedeschi, S. Behari, S. Belforte , et al. (388 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: The properties of three-jet events with total transverse energy greater than 320 GeV and individual jet energy greater than 20 GeV have been analyzed and compared to absolute predictions from a next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD calculation. These data, of integrated luminosity 86 pb^-1, were recorded by the CDF Experiment for proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt{s}=1.8 TeV. This study… ▽ More The properties of three-jet events with total transverse energy greater than 320 GeV and individual jet energy greater than 20 GeV have been analyzed and compared to absolute predictions from a next-to-leading order (NLO) perturbative QCD calculation. These data, of integrated luminosity 86 pb^-1, were recorded by the CDF Experiment for proton-antiproton collisions at sqrt{s}=1.8 TeV. This study tests a model of higher order QCD processes that result in gluon emission and can be used to estimate the magnitude of the contribution of processes higher than NLO. The total cross section is measured to be 466 +/- 3(stat.)^{+207}_{-70}(syst.) pb. The differential cross section is furthermore measured for all kinematically accessible regions of the Dalitz plane, including those for which the theoretical prediction is unreliable. While the measured cross section is consistent with the theoretical prediction in magnitude, the two differ somewhat in shape in the Dalitz plane. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2004; originally announced October 2004.

Journal ref: Phys.Rev.D71:032002,2005