-
Why is the Conclusion of the GERDA Experiment not Justified ?
Authors:
Hans Volker Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
Irina V. Krivosheina
Abstract:
The first results of the GERDA double beta experiment in Gran Sasso were recently presented. They are fully consistent with the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment, but because of its low statistics cannot proof anything at this moment. It is no surprise that the statistics is still far from being able to test the signal claimed by the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment. The energy resolution of the coaxial de…
▽ More
The first results of the GERDA double beta experiment in Gran Sasso were recently presented. They are fully consistent with the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment, but because of its low statistics cannot proof anything at this moment. It is no surprise that the statistics is still far from being able to test the signal claimed by the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment. The energy resolution of the coaxial detectors is a factor of 1.5 worse than in the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment. The original goal of background reduction to 10^{-2}counts/kgykeV, or by an order of magnitude compared to the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment, has not been reached. The background is only a factor 2.3 lower if we refer it to the experimental line width, i.e. in units counts/kgy energy resolution.
With pulse shape analysis (PSA) the background in the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment around Q_{ββ} is 4x10^{-3} counts/kgykeV \cite{HVKK-IVK-MPhLA2006}, which is a factor of 4 (5 referring to the line width) lower than that of GERDA with pulse shape analysis.
The amount of enriched material used in the GERDA measurement is 14.6kg, only a factor of 1.34 larger than that used in the HM experiment. The background model is oversimplified and not yet adequate. It is not shown that the lines of their background can be identified. GERDA has to continue the measurement further ~5years, until they can responsibly present an understood background. The present half life limit presented by GERDA of T_{1/2}^{0ν} > 2.1 x 10^{25} y (90% confidence level, i.e. 1.6sigma)) is still lower than the half-life of T_{1/2}^{0ν} = 2.23^{{+0.44}_{-0.31}} x 10^{25} y \cite{HVKK-IVK-MPhLA2006} determined in the HEIDELBERG-MOSCOW experiment.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2013; v1 submitted 12 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
-
Nuclear Double Beta Decay, Fundamental Particle Physics, Hot Dark Matter, And Dark Energy
Authors:
Hans V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
Irina V. Krivosheina
Abstract:
Nuclear double beta decay, an extremely rare radioactive decay process, is - in one of its variants - one of the most exciting means of research into particle physics beyond the standard model. The large progress in sensitivity of experiments searching for neutrinoless double beta decay in the last two decades - based largely on the use of large amounts of enriched source material in "active sourc…
▽ More
Nuclear double beta decay, an extremely rare radioactive decay process, is - in one of its variants - one of the most exciting means of research into particle physics beyond the standard model. The large progress in sensitivity of experiments searching for neutrinoless double beta decay in the last two decades - based largely on the use of large amounts of enriched source material in "active source experiments" - has lead to the observation of the occurrence of this process in nature (on a 6.4 sigma level), with the largest half-life ever observed for a nuclear decay process (2.2 x 10^{25} y). This has fundamental consequences for particle physics - violation of lepton number, Majorana nature of the neutrino. These results are independent of any information on nuclear matrix elements (NME)*. It further leads to sharp restrictions for SUSY theories, sneutrino mass, right-handed W-boson mass, superheavy neutrino masses, compositeness, leptoquarks, violation of Lorentz invariance and equivalence principle in the neutrino sector. The masses of light-neutrinos are found to be degenerate, and to be at least 0.22 +- 0.02 eV. This fixes the contribution of neutrinos as hot dark matter to >=4.7% of the total observed dark matter. The neutrino mass determined might solve also the dark energy puzzle. *(It is briefly discussed how important NME for 0nubb decay really are.)
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2010; v1 submitted 11 June, 2010;
originally announced June 2010.
-
Limits on the Majorana neutrino mass in the 0.1 eV range
Authors:
L. Baudis,
A. Dietz,
G. Heusser,
H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
I. V. Krivosheina,
St. Kolb,
B. Majorovits,
V. F. Melnikov,
H. Paes,
F. Schwamm,
H. Strecker,
V. Alexeev,
A. Balysh,
A. Bakalyarov,
S. T. Belyaev,
V. I. Lebedev,
S. Zhukov
Abstract:
The Heidelberg-Moscow experiment gives the most stringent limit on the Majorana neutrino mass. After 24 kg yr of data with pulse shape measurements, we set a lower limit on the half-life of the neutrinoless double beta decay in 76Ge of T_1/2 > 5.7 * 10^{25} yr at 90% C.L., thus excluding an effective Majorana neutrino mass greater than 0.2 eV. This allows to set strong constraints on degenerate…
▽ More
The Heidelberg-Moscow experiment gives the most stringent limit on the Majorana neutrino mass. After 24 kg yr of data with pulse shape measurements, we set a lower limit on the half-life of the neutrinoless double beta decay in 76Ge of T_1/2 > 5.7 * 10^{25} yr at 90% C.L., thus excluding an effective Majorana neutrino mass greater than 0.2 eV. This allows to set strong constraints on degenerate neutrino mass models.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 1999;
originally announced February 1999.
