-
The Electric Field Dependence of Single Electron Emission in the PIXeY Two-Phase Xenon Detector
Authors:
E. Bodnia,
E. P. Bernard,
A. Biekert,
E. M. Boulton,
S. B. Cahn,
N. Destefano,
B. N. V. Edwards,
M. Gai,
M. Horn,
N. A. Larsen,
Q. Riffard,
B. Tennyson,
V. Velan,
C. Wahl,
D. N. McKinsey
Abstract:
Dual phase xenon detectors are widely used in experimental searches for galactic darkmatter particles. The origin of single electron backgrounds following prompt scintillation and proportional scintillation signals in these detectors is not fully understood, although there has been progress in recent years. In this paper, we describe single electron backgrounds in ${}^{83m}Kr$ calibration events a…
▽ More
Dual phase xenon detectors are widely used in experimental searches for galactic darkmatter particles. The origin of single electron backgrounds following prompt scintillation and proportional scintillation signals in these detectors is not fully understood, although there has been progress in recent years. In this paper, we describe single electron backgrounds in ${}^{83m}Kr$ calibration events and their correlation with drift and extraction fields, using the Particle Identification in Xenon at Yale (PIXeY) dual-phase xenon time projection chamber. The single electron background induced by the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) effect is measured, and its electric field dependence is quantified. The photoionization of grids and impurities by prompt scintillation and proportional scintillation also contributes to the single electron background.
△ Less
Submitted 16 December, 2021; v1 submitted 10 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Extraction efficiency of drifting electrons in a two-phase xenon time projection chamber
Authors:
B. N. V. Edwards,
E. Bernard,
E. M. Boulton,
N. Destefano,
M. Gai,
M. Horn,
N. Larsen,
B. Tennyson,
L. Tvrznikova,
C. Wahl,
D. N. McKinsey
Abstract:
We present a measurement of the extraction efficiency of quasi-free electrons from the liquid into the gas phase in a two-phase xenon time-projection chamber. The measurements span a range of electric fields from 2.4 to 7.1 kV/cm in the liquid xenon, corresponding to 4.5 to 13.1 kV/cm in the gaseous xenon. Extraction efficiency continues to increase at the highest extraction fields, implying that…
▽ More
We present a measurement of the extraction efficiency of quasi-free electrons from the liquid into the gas phase in a two-phase xenon time-projection chamber. The measurements span a range of electric fields from 2.4 to 7.1 kV/cm in the liquid xenon, corresponding to 4.5 to 13.1 kV/cm in the gaseous xenon. Extraction efficiency continues to increase at the highest extraction fields, implying that additional charge signal may be attained in two-phase xenon detectors through careful high-voltage engineering of the gate-anode region.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2018; v1 submitted 30 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Solar fusion cross sections II: the pp chain and CNO cycles
Authors:
E. G. Adelberger,
A. B. Balantekin,
D. Bemmerer,
C. A. Bertulani,
J. -W. Chen,
H. Costantini,
M. Couder,
R. Cyburt,
B. Davids,
S. J. Freedman,
M. Gai,
A. Garcia,
D. Gazit,
L. Gialanella,
U. Greife,
M. Hass,
K. Heeger,
W. C. Haxton,
G. Imbriani,
T. Itahashi,
A. Junghans,
K. Kubodera,
K. Langanke,
D. Leitner,
M. Leitner
, et al. (23 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We summarize and critically evaluate the available data on nuclear fusion cross sections important to energy generation in the Sun and other hydrogen-burning stars and to solar neutrino production. Recommended values and uncertainties are provided for key cross sections, and a recommended spectrum is given for 8B solar neutrinos. We also discuss opportunities for further increasing the precision o…
▽ More
We summarize and critically evaluate the available data on nuclear fusion cross sections important to energy generation in the Sun and other hydrogen-burning stars and to solar neutrino production. Recommended values and uncertainties are provided for key cross sections, and a recommended spectrum is given for 8B solar neutrinos. We also discuss opportunities for further increasing the precision of key rates, including new facilities, new experimental techniques, and improvements in theory. This review, which summarizes the conclusions of a workshop held at the Institute for Nuclear Theory, Seattle, in January 2009, is intended as a 10-year update and supplement to Reviews of Modern Physics 70 (1998) 1265.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2010; v1 submitted 14 April, 2010;
originally announced April 2010.
-
Status of the Standard Solar Model Prediction of Solar Neutrino Fluxes
Authors:
Moshe Gai
Abstract:
The Standard Solar Model (BP04) predicts a total 8B neutrino flux that is 17.2% larger than measured in the salt phase of the SNO detector (and if it were significant it will indicate oscillation to sterile neutrinos). Hence it is important to examine in details uncertainties (and values) of inputs to the SSM. Currently, the largest fractional uncertainty is due to the new evaluation of the surf…
▽ More
The Standard Solar Model (BP04) predicts a total 8B neutrino flux that is 17.2% larger than measured in the salt phase of the SNO detector (and if it were significant it will indicate oscillation to sterile neutrinos). Hence it is important to examine in details uncertainties (and values) of inputs to the SSM. Currently, the largest fractional uncertainty is due to the new evaluation of the surface composition of the sun. We examine the nuclear input on the formation of solar 8B [S17(0)] and demonstrate that it is still quite uncertain due to ill known slope of the measured astrophysical cross section factor and thus ill defined extrapolation to zero energy. This yields an additional reasonably estimated uncertainty due to extrapolation of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b (+0% -14%). Since a large discrepancy exists among measured as well as among predicted slopes, the value of S17(0) is dependent on the choice of data and theory used to extrapolate S17(0). This situation must be alleviated by new measurement(s). The "world average" is driven by the Seattle result due to the very small quoted uncertainty, which we however demonstrate it to be an over-estimated accuracy. We propose more realistic error bars for the Seattle results based on the published Seattle data.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2005;
originally announced October 2005.
-
Do We Accurately Know the Formation of Solar 8B?
Authors:
Moshe Gai
Abstract:
A detailed examination of current data on S_17 (as opposed to an examination of S_17(0) only) excludes quoting S_17(0) with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to suggestions that S_17(0) is now known with the accuracy of \pm 3%, the exact value of S_17(0) is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results (in…
▽ More
A detailed examination of current data on S_17 (as opposed to an examination of S_17(0) only) excludes quoting S_17(0) with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to suggestions that S_17(0) is now known with the accuracy of \pm 3%, the exact value of S_17(0) is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results (including the Seattle data) on S_17 which are in good agreement, still differ on the measured slopes, as do theoretical models that predict different d-wave contribution, precluding an accurate extrapolation to zero energy of the consistent data. Using a common extrapolation of only the consistent high precision data, suggests a value of S_17(0) = 21.2 \pm 0.5 eV-b, but a value equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can not be excluded due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation, leading to an additional error of +0.0 -3.0 eV-b. This (unacceptable) situation must be cleared by future experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2004;
originally announced October 2004.
-
How Accurately Do We Know the Formation of Solar 8B?
Authors:
Moshe Gai
Abstract:
The large value of \S17 = 22.1 \xpm 0.6 eV-b, reported by the Seattle group, suggests a larger total \b8 solar neutrino flux. Together with the two high precision values quoted for \s34 it is either 20% or 9% larger than measured by SNO. While the accuracy of the Standard Solar Model has recently been revisited, precise nuclear inputs are still relevant, but a detailed examination of current dat…
▽ More
The large value of \S17 = 22.1 \xpm 0.6 eV-b, reported by the Seattle group, suggests a larger total \b8 solar neutrino flux. Together with the two high precision values quoted for \s34 it is either 20% or 9% larger than measured by SNO. While the accuracy of the Standard Solar Model has recently been revisited, precise nuclear inputs are still relevant, but a detailed examination of current data on \xs17 (as opposed to an examination of \S17 only) excludes quoting \S17 with sufficiently small uncertainty. In contrast to suggestions that \S17 is now known with the (impressive) accuracy of \xpm 3%, the exact value of \S17 is dependent on the choice of the data and the choice of theory used for extrapolation. In addition recent high precision results (including the Seattle data) on \xs17 which are in good agreement, still differ on the measured slopes, as does the theory, precluding an accurate extrapolation to zero energy of the consistent data. Using a common extrapolation of only the consistent high precision data, suggests a value of \S17 = 21.2 \xpm 0.5 eV-b, but a value equal to or smaller than 19.0 eV-b can not be excluded due to the uncertainty in the extrapolation, leading to an additional error of $^{+0.0}_{-3.0}$ eV-b. A proposal to remedy this situation is discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2004; v1 submitted 1 December, 2003;
originally announced December 2003.
