-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb
Authors:
The Muon $g-2$ Collaboration,
:,
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
J. Annala,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey
, et al. (171 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A new measurement of the magnetic anomaly $a_μ$ of the positive muon is presented based on data taken from 2020 to 2023 by the Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL). This dataset contains over 2.5 times the total statistics of our previous results. From the ratio of the precession frequencies for muons and protons in our storage ring magnetic field, together with pr…
▽ More
A new measurement of the magnetic anomaly $a_μ$ of the positive muon is presented based on data taken from 2020 to 2023 by the Muon $g-2$ Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL). This dataset contains over 2.5 times the total statistics of our previous results. From the ratio of the precession frequencies for muons and protons in our storage ring magnetic field, together with precisely known ratios of fundamental constants, we determine $a_μ = 116\,592\,0710(162) \times 10^{-12}$ (139 ppb) for the new datasets, and $a_μ = 116\,592\,0705(148) \times 10^{-12}$ (127 ppb) when combined with our previous results. The new experimental world average, dominated by the measurements at FNAL, is $a_μ(\text{exp}) =116\,592\,0715(145) \times 10^{-12}$ (124 ppb). The measurements at FNAL have improved the precision on the world average by over a factor of four.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update
Authors:
R. Aliberti,
T. Aoyama,
E. Balzani,
A. Bashir,
G. Benton,
J. Bijnens,
V. Biloshytskyi,
T. Blum,
D. Boito,
M. Bruno,
E. Budassi,
S. Burri,
L. Cappiello,
C. M. Carloni Calame,
M. Cè,
V. Cirigliano,
D. A. Clarke,
G. Colangelo,
L. Cotrozzi,
M. Cottini,
I. Danilkin,
M. Davier,
M. Della Morte,
A. Denig,
C. DeTar
, et al. (210 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the current Standard Model (SM) prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_μ$, updating the first White Paper (WP20) [1]. The pure QED and electroweak contributions have been further consolidated, while hadronic contributions continue to be responsible for the bulk of the uncertainty of the SM prediction. Significant progress has been achieved in the hadronic light-by-light s…
▽ More
We present the current Standard Model (SM) prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_μ$, updating the first White Paper (WP20) [1]. The pure QED and electroweak contributions have been further consolidated, while hadronic contributions continue to be responsible for the bulk of the uncertainty of the SM prediction. Significant progress has been achieved in the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution using both the data-driven dispersive approach as well as lattice-QCD calculations, leading to a reduction of the uncertainty by almost a factor of two. The most important development since WP20 is the change in the estimate of the leading-order hadronic-vacuum-polarization (LO HVP) contribution. A new measurement of the $e^+e^-\toπ^+π^-$ cross section by CMD-3 has increased the tensions among data-driven dispersive evaluations of the LO HVP contribution to a level that makes it impossible to combine the results in a meaningful way. At the same time, the attainable precision of lattice-QCD calculations has increased substantially and allows for a consolidated lattice-QCD average of the LO HVP contribution with a precision of about 0.9%. Adopting the latter in this update has resulted in a major upward shift of the total SM prediction, which now reads $a_μ^\text{SM} = 116\,592\,033(62)\times 10^{-11}$ (530 ppb). When compared against the current experimental average based on the E821 experiment and runs 1-6 of E989 at Fermilab, one finds $a_μ^\text{exp} - a_μ^\text{SM} =38(63)\times 10^{-11}$, which implies that there is no tension between the SM and experiment at the current level of precision. The final precision of E989 (127 ppb) is the target of future efforts by the Theory Initiative. The resolution of the tensions among data-driven dispersive evaluations of the LO HVP contribution will be a key element in this endeavor.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2025; v1 submitted 27 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Measurement of $η\toπ^{0}γγ$ branching fraction with the KLOE detector
Authors:
D. Babusci,
P. Beltrame,
M. Berlowski,
C. Bloise,
F. Bossi,
P. Branchini,
B. Cao,
F. Ceradini,
P. Ciambrone,
L. Cotrozzi,
F. Curciarello,
E. Czerwiński,
G. D'Agostini,
R. D'Amico,
E. Danè,
V. De Leo,
E. De Lucia,
A. De Santis,
P. De Simone,
A. Di Domenico,
E. Diociaiuti,
D. Domenici,
A. D'Uffizi,
G. Fantini,
S. Fiore
, et al. (28 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a measurement of the radiative decay $η\toπ^0γγ$ using 82 million $η$ mesons produced in $e^+e^-\toφ\toηγ$ process at the Frascati $φ$-factory DA$Φ$NE. From the data analysis $1246\pm133$ signal events are observed. By normalising the signal to the well-known $η\to3π^0$ decay the branching fraction ${\cal B}(η\toπ^0γγ)$ is measured to be…
▽ More
We present a measurement of the radiative decay $η\toπ^0γγ$ using 82 million $η$ mesons produced in $e^+e^-\toφ\toηγ$ process at the Frascati $φ$-factory DA$Φ$NE. From the data analysis $1246\pm133$ signal events are observed. By normalising the signal to the well-known $η\to3π^0$ decay the branching fraction ${\cal B}(η\toπ^0γγ)$ is measured to be $(0.98\pm 0.11_\text{stat}\pm 0.14_\text{syst})\times10^{-4}$. This result agrees with a preliminary KLOE measurement, but is twice smaller than the present world average. Results for $dΓ(η\toπ^0γγ)/dM^2(γγ)$ are also presented and compared with latest theory predictions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2025; v1 submitted 14 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Radiative corrections and Monte Carlo tools for low-energy hadronic cross sections in $e^+ e^-$ collisions
Authors:
Riccardo Aliberti,
Paolo Beltrame,
Ettore Budassi,
Carlo M. Carloni Calame,
Gilberto Colangelo,
Lorenzo Cotrozzi,
Achim Denig,
Anna Driutti,
Tim Engel,
Lois Flower,
Andrea Gurgone,
Martin Hoferichter,
Fedor Ignatov,
Sophie Kollatzsch,
Bastian Kubis,
Andrzej Kupść,
Fabian Lange,
Alberto Lusiani,
Stefan E. Müller,
Jérémy Paltrinieri,
Pau Petit Rosàs,
Fulvio Piccinini,
Alan Price,
Lorenzo Punzi,
Marco Rocco
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the results of Phase I of an ongoing review of Monte Carlo tools relevant for low-energy hadronic cross sections. This includes a detailed comparison of Monte Carlo codes for electron-positron scattering into a muon pair, pion pair, and electron pair, for scan and radiative-return experiments. After discussing the various approaches that are used and effects that are included, we show d…
▽ More
We present the results of Phase I of an ongoing review of Monte Carlo tools relevant for low-energy hadronic cross sections. This includes a detailed comparison of Monte Carlo codes for electron-positron scattering into a muon pair, pion pair, and electron pair, for scan and radiative-return experiments. After discussing the various approaches that are used and effects that are included, we show differential cross sections obtained with AfkQed, BabaYaga@NLO, KKMC, MCGPJ, McMule, Phokhara, and Sherpa, for scenarios that are inspired by experiments providing input for the dispersive evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 June, 2025; v1 submitted 30 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Detailed Report on the Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (168 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference b…
▽ More
We present details on a new measurement of the muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ= (g_μ-2)/2$. The result is based on positive muon data taken at Fermilab's Muon Campus during the 2019 and 2020 accelerator runs. The measurement uses $3.1$ GeV$/c$ polarized muons stored in a $7.1$-m-radius storage ring with a $1.45$ T uniform magnetic field. The value of $ a_μ$ is determined from the measured difference between the muon spin precession frequency and its cyclotron frequency. This difference is normalized to the strength of the magnetic field, measured using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). The ratio is then corrected for small contributions from beam motion, beam dispersion, and transient magnetic fields. We measure $a_μ= 116 592 057 (25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). This is the world's most precise measurement of this quantity and represents a factor of $2.2$ improvement over our previous result based on the 2018 dataset. In combination, the two datasets yield $a_μ(\text{FNAL}) = 116 592 055 (24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). Combining this with the measurements from Brookhaven National Laboratory for both positive and negative muons, the new world average is $a_μ$(exp) $ = 116 592 059 (22) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm).
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm
Authors:
D. P. Aguillard,
T. Albahri,
D. Allspach,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
L. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
S. Braun,
M. Bressler,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey
, et al. (166 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable…
▽ More
We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, $a_μ\equiv (g_μ- 2)/2$, from the Fermilab Muon $g\!-\!2$ Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, $\tildeω'^{}_p$, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, $ω_a$. From the ratio $ω_a / \tildeω'^{}_p$, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine $a_μ= 116\,592\,057(25) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain $a_μ\text{(FNAL)} = 116\,592\,055(24) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is $a_μ(\text{Exp}) = 116\,592\,059(22)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.19 ppm), which represents a factor of 2 improvement in precision.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2023; v1 submitted 11 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm
Authors:
B. Abi,
T. Albahri,
S. Al-Kilani,
D. Allspach,
L. P. Alonzi,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
F. Azfar,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
E. Barzi,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
A. Behnke,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
R. Bjorkquist,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico
, et al. (212 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in…
▽ More
We present the first results of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment for the positive muon magnetic anomaly $a_μ\equiv (g_μ-2)/2$. The anomaly is determined from the precision measurements of two angular frequencies. Intensity variation of high-energy positrons from muon decays directly encodes the difference frequency $ω_a$ between the spin-precession and cyclotron frequencies for polarized muons in a magnetic storage ring. The storage ring magnetic field is measured using nuclear magnetic resonance probes calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency ${\tildeω'^{}_p}$ in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^{\circ}$C. The ratio $ω_a / {\tildeω'^{}_p}$, together with known fundamental constants, determines $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.46\,ppm). The result is 3.3 standard deviations greater than the standard model prediction and is in excellent agreement with the previous Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) E821 measurement. After combination with previous measurements of both $μ^+$ and $μ^-$, the new experimental average of $a_μ({\rm Exp}) = 116\,592\,061(41)\times 10^{-11}$ (0.35\,ppm) increases the tension between experiment and theory to 4.2 standard deviations
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g-2 experiment
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
A. Anisenkov,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
A. Basti,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain
, et al. (153 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muo…
▽ More
The Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL) has measured the muon anomalous precession frequency $ω_a$ to an uncertainty of 434 parts per billion (ppb), statistical, and 56 ppb, systematic, with data collected in four storage ring configurations during its first physics run in 2018. When combined with a precision measurement of the magnetic field of the experiment's muon storage ring, the precession frequency measurement determines a muon magnetic anomaly of $a_μ({\rm FNAL}) = 116\,592\,040(54) \times 10^{-11}$ (0.46 ppm). This article describes the multiple techniques employed in the reconstruction, analysis and fitting of the data to measure the precession frequency. It also presents the averaging of the results from the eleven separate determinations of ω_a, and the systematic uncertainties on the result.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Beam dynamics corrections to the Run-1 measurement of the muon anomalous magnetic moment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (152 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is fe…
▽ More
This paper presents the beam dynamics systematic corrections and their uncertainties for the Run-1 data set of the Fermilab Muon g-2 Experiment. Two corrections to the measured muon precession frequency $ω_a^m$ are associated with well-known effects owing to the use of electrostatic quadrupole (ESQ) vertical focusing in the storage ring. An average vertically oriented motional magnetic field is felt by relativistic muons passing transversely through the radial electric field components created by the ESQ system. The correction depends on the stored momentum distribution and the tunes of the ring, which has relatively weak vertical focusing. Vertical betatron motions imply that the muons do not orbit the ring in a plane exactly orthogonal to the vertical magnetic field direction. A correction is necessary to account for an average pitch angle associated with their trajectories. A third small correction is necessary because muons that escape the ring during the storage time are slightly biased in initial spin phase compared to the parent distribution. Finally, because two high-voltage resistors in the ESQ network had longer than designed RC time constants, the vertical and horizontal centroids and envelopes of the stored muon beam drifted slightly, but coherently, during each storage ring fill. This led to the discovery of an important phase-acceptance relationship that requires a correction. The sum of the corrections to $ω_a^m$ is 0.50 $\pm$ 0.09 ppm; the uncertainty is small compared to the 0.43 ppm statistical precision of $ω_a^m$.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Magnetic Field Measurement and Analysis for the Muon g-2 Experiment at Fermilab
Authors:
T. Albahri,
A. Anastasi,
K. Badgley,
S. Baeßler,
I. Bailey,
V. A. Baranov,
E. Barlas-Yucel,
T. Barrett,
F. Bedeschi,
M. Berz,
M. Bhattacharya,
H. P. Binney,
P. Bloom,
J. Bono,
E. Bottalico,
T. Bowcock,
G. Cantatore,
R. M. Carey,
B. C. K. Casey,
D. Cauz,
R. Chakraborty,
S. P. Chang,
A. Chapelain,
S. Charity,
R. Chislett
, et al. (148 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrat…
▽ More
The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory has measured the anomalous precession frequency $a^{}_μ= (g^{}_μ-2)/2$ of the muon to a combined precision of 0.46 parts per million with data collected during its first physics run in 2018. This paper documents the measurement of the magnetic field in the muon storage ring. The magnetic field is monitored by nuclear magnetic resonance systems and calibrated in terms of the equivalent proton spin precession frequency in a spherical water sample at 34.7$^\circ$C. The measured field is weighted by the muon distribution resulting in $\tildeω'^{}_p$, the denominator in the ratio $ω^{}_a$/$\tildeω'^{}_p$ that together with known fundamental constants yields $a^{}_μ$. The reported uncertainty on $\tildeω'^{}_p$ for the Run-1 data set is 114 ppb consisting of uncertainty contributions from frequency extraction, calibration, mapping, tracking, and averaging of 56 ppb, and contributions from fast transient fields of 99 ppb.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
