-
The CMS Barrel Timing Layer: test beam confirmation of module timing performance
Authors:
F. Addesa,
P. Akrap,
A. Albert,
B. Allmond,
T. Anderson,
J. Babbar,
D. Baranyai,
P. Barria,
C. Basile,
A. Benaglia,
A. Benato,
M. Benettoni,
M. Besancon,
N. Bez,
S. Bhattacharya,
R. Bianco,
D. Blend,
A. Boletti,
A. Bornheim,
R. Bugalho,
A. Bulla,
B. Cardwell,
R. Carlin,
M. Casarsa,
F. Cetorelli
, et al. (105 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
First of its kind, the barrel section of the MIP Timing Detector is a large area timing detector based on LYSO:Ce crystals and SiPMs which are required to operate in an unprecedentedly harsh radiation environment (up to an integrated fluence of $2\times10^{14}$ 1 MeV $n_{eq}/cm^2$). It is designed as a key element of the upgrade of the existing CMS detector to provide a time resolution for minimum…
▽ More
First of its kind, the barrel section of the MIP Timing Detector is a large area timing detector based on LYSO:Ce crystals and SiPMs which are required to operate in an unprecedentedly harsh radiation environment (up to an integrated fluence of $2\times10^{14}$ 1 MeV $n_{eq}/cm^2$). It is designed as a key element of the upgrade of the existing CMS detector to provide a time resolution for minimum ionizing particles in the range between 30-60 ps throughout the entire operation at the High Luminosity LHC. A thorough optimization of its components has led to the final detector module layout which exploits 25 $\rm μm$ cell size SiPMs and 3.75 mm thick crystals. This design achieved the target performance in a series of test beam campaigns. In this paper we present test beam results which demonstrate the desired performance of detector modules in terms of radiation tolerance, time resolution and response uniformity.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2025;
originally announced April 2025.
-
Optimization of LYSO crystals and SiPM parameters for the CMS MIP timing detector
Authors:
F. Addesa,
T. Anderson,
P. Barria,
C. Basile,
A. Benaglia,
R. Bertoni,
A. Bethani,
R. Bianco,
A. Bornheim,
G. Boldrini,
A. Boletti,
A. Bulla,
M. Campana,
B. Cardwell,
P. Carniti,
F. Cetorelli,
F. De Guio,
K. De Leo,
F. De Riggi,
J. Dervan,
E. Fernandez,
A. Gaile,
M. Gallinaro,
A. Ghezzi,
C. Gotti
, et al. (46 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
For the High-Luminosity (HL-LHC) phase, the upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at CERN will include a novel MIP Timing Detector (MTD). The central part of MTD, the barrel timing layer (BTL), is designed to provide a measurement of the time of arrival of charged particles with a precision of 30 ps at the beginning of HL-LHC, progressively degrading to 60 ps while operating in an…
▽ More
For the High-Luminosity (HL-LHC) phase, the upgrade of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at CERN will include a novel MIP Timing Detector (MTD). The central part of MTD, the barrel timing layer (BTL), is designed to provide a measurement of the time of arrival of charged particles with a precision of 30 ps at the beginning of HL-LHC, progressively degrading to 60 ps while operating in an extremely harsh radiation environment for over a decade. In this paper we present a comparative analysis of the time resolution of BTL module prototypes made of LYSO:Ce crystal bars read out by silicon photo-multipliers (SiPMs). The timing performance measured in beam test campaigns is presented for prototypes with different construction and operation parameters, such as different SiPM cell sizes (15, 20, 25 and 30 $\rm μm$), SiPM manufacturers and crystal bar thicknesses. The evolution of time resolution as a function of the irradiation level has been studied using non-irradiated SiPMs as well as SiPMs exposed up to $2\times 10^{14}~n_{eq}/cm^2$ fluence. The key parameters defining the module time resolution such as SiPM characteristics (gain, photon detection efficiency, radiation induced dark count rate) and crystal properties (light output and dimensions) are discussed. These results have informed the final choice of the MTD barrel sensor configuration and offer a unique starting point for the design of future large-area scintillator-based timing detectors in either low or high radiation environments.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Second Analysis Ecosystem Workshop Report
Authors:
Mohamed Aly,
Jackson Burzynski,
Bryan Cardwell,
Daniel C. Craik,
Tal van Daalen,
Tomas Dado,
Ayanabha Das,
Antonio Delgado Peris,
Caterina Doglioni,
Peter Elmer,
Engin Eren,
Martin B. Eriksen,
Jonas Eschle,
Giulio Eulisse,
Conor Fitzpatrick,
José Flix Molina,
Alessandra Forti,
Ben Galewsky,
Sean Gasiorowski,
Aman Goel,
Loukas Gouskos,
Enrico Guiraud,
Kanhaiya Gupta,
Stephan Hageboeck,
Allison Reinsvold Hall
, et al. (44 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each to…
▽ More
The second workshop on the HEP Analysis Ecosystem took place 23-25 May 2022 at IJCLab in Orsay, to look at progress and continuing challenges in scaling up HEP analysis to meet the needs of HL-LHC and DUNE, as well as the very pressing needs of LHC Run 3 analysis.
The workshop was themed around six particular topics, which were felt to capture key questions, opportunities and challenges. Each topic arranged a plenary session introduction, often with speakers summarising the state-of-the art and the next steps for analysis. This was then followed by parallel sessions, which were much more discussion focused, and where attendees could grapple with the challenges and propose solutions that could be tried. Where there was significant overlap between topics, a joint discussion between them was arranged.
In the weeks following the workshop the session conveners wrote this document, which is a summary of the main discussions, the key points raised and the conclusions and outcomes. The document was circulated amongst the participants for comments before being finalised here.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
