-
Enabling real-time multi-messenger astrophysics discoveries with deep learning
Authors:
E. A. Huerta,
Gabrielle Allen,
Igor Andreoni,
Javier M. Antelis,
Etienne Bachelet,
Bruce Berriman,
Federica Bianco,
Rahul Biswas,
Matias Carrasco,
Kyle Chard,
Minsik Cho,
Philip S. Cowperthwaite,
Zachariah B. Etienne,
Maya Fishbach,
Francisco Förster,
Daniel George,
Tom Gibbs,
Matthew Graham,
William Gropp,
Robert Gruendl,
Anushri Gupta,
Roland Haas,
Sarah Habib,
Elise Jennings,
Margaret W. G. Johnson
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Multi-messenger astrophysics is a fast-growing, interdisciplinary field that combines data, which vary in volume and speed of data processing, from many different instruments that probe the Universe using different cosmic messengers: electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, gravitational waves and neutrinos. In this Expert Recommendation, we review the key challenges of real-time observations of gravit…
▽ More
Multi-messenger astrophysics is a fast-growing, interdisciplinary field that combines data, which vary in volume and speed of data processing, from many different instruments that probe the Universe using different cosmic messengers: electromagnetic waves, cosmic rays, gravitational waves and neutrinos. In this Expert Recommendation, we review the key challenges of real-time observations of gravitational wave sources and their electromagnetic and astroparticle counterparts, and make a number of recommendations to maximize their potential for scientific discovery. These recommendations refer to the design of scalable and computationally efficient machine learning algorithms; the cyber-infrastructure to numerically simulate astrophysical sources, and to process and interpret multi-messenger astrophysics data; the management of gravitational wave detections to trigger real-time alerts for electromagnetic and astroparticle follow-ups; a vision to harness future developments of machine learning and cyber-infrastructure resources to cope with the big-data requirements; and the need to build a community of experts to realize the goals of multi-messenger astrophysics.
△ Less
Submitted 26 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Cyberinfrastructure Requirements to Enhance Multi-messenger Astrophysics
Authors:
Philip Chang,
Gabrielle Allen,
Warren Anderson,
Federica B. Bianco,
Joshua S. Bloom,
Patrick R. Brady,
Adam Brazier,
S. Bradley Cenko,
Sean M. Couch,
Tyce DeYoung,
Ewa Deelman,
Zachariah B Etienne,
Ryan J. Foley,
Derek B Fox,
V. Zach Golkhou,
Darren R Grant,
Chad Hanna,
Kelly Holley-Bockelmann,
D. Andrew Howell,
E. A. Huerta,
Margaret W. G. Johnson,
Mario Juric,
David L. Kaplan,
Daniel S. Katz,
Azadeh Keivani
, et al. (17 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The identification of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational wave event, GW170817, and discovery of neutrinos and gamma-rays from TXS 0506+056 heralded the new era of multi-messenger astrophysics. As the number of multi-messenger events rapidly grow over the next decade, the cyberinfrastructure requirements to handle the increase in data rates, data volume, need for event follow up,…
▽ More
The identification of the electromagnetic counterpart of the gravitational wave event, GW170817, and discovery of neutrinos and gamma-rays from TXS 0506+056 heralded the new era of multi-messenger astrophysics. As the number of multi-messenger events rapidly grow over the next decade, the cyberinfrastructure requirements to handle the increase in data rates, data volume, need for event follow up, and analysis across the different messengers will also explosively grow. The cyberinfrastructure requirements to enhance multi-messenger astrophysics will both be a major challenge and opportunity for astronomers, physicists, computer scientists and cyberinfrastructure specialists. Here we outline some of these requirements and argue for a distributed cyberinfrastructure institute for multi-messenger astrophysics to meet these challenges.
△ Less
Submitted 11 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Avila,
M. Banerji,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. Brout,
D. L. Burke,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
A. Chen,
M. Crocce,
C. E. Cunha,
L. N. da Costa
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curv…
▽ More
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $Ω_k$, 2) number of relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$ (alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$), and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $μ_0$ and $Σ_0$ that modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find $Ω_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23}, -0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p, w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1 combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $Σ_0= 0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(Σ_0, μ_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2019; v1 submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Supplement: Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the dif…
▽ More
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared wit…
▽ More
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
