-
Euclid preparation. Constraining parameterised models of modifications of gravity with the spectroscopic and photometric primary probes
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
I. S. Albuquerque,
N. Frusciante,
Z. Sakr,
S. Srinivasan,
L. Atayde,
B. Bose,
V. F. Cardone,
S. Casas,
M. Martinelli,
J. Noller,
E. M. Teixeira,
D. B. Thomas,
I. Tutusaus,
M. Cataneo,
K. Koyama,
L. Lombriser,
F. Pace,
A. Silvestri,
N. Aghanim,
A. Amara,
S. Andreon,
N. Auricchio,
C. Baccigalupi,
M. Baldi
, et al. (263 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Euclid mission has the potential to understand the fundamental physical nature of late-time cosmic acceleration and, as such, of deviations from the standard cosmological model, LCDM. In this paper, we focus on model-independent methods to modify the evolution of scalar perturbations at linear scales. We consider two approaches: the first is based on the two phenomenological modified gravity (…
▽ More
The Euclid mission has the potential to understand the fundamental physical nature of late-time cosmic acceleration and, as such, of deviations from the standard cosmological model, LCDM. In this paper, we focus on model-independent methods to modify the evolution of scalar perturbations at linear scales. We consider two approaches: the first is based on the two phenomenological modified gravity (PMG) parameters, $μ_{\rm mg}$ and $Σ_{\rm mg}$, which are phenomenologically connected to the clustering of matter and weak lensing, respectively; and the second is the effective field theory (EFT) of dark energy and modified gravity, which we use to parameterise the braiding function, $α_{\rm B}$, which defines the mixing between the metric and the dark energy field. We discuss the predictions from spectroscopic and photometric primary probes by Euclid on the cosmological parameters and a given set of additional parameters featuring the PMG and EFT models. We use the Fisher matrix method applied to spectroscopic galaxy clustering (GCsp), weak lensing (WL), photometric galaxy clustering (GCph), and cross-correlation (XC) between GCph and WL. For the modelling of photometric predictions on nonlinear scales, we use the halo model to cover two limits for the screening mechanism: the unscreened (US) case, for which the screening mechanism is not present; and the super-screened (SS) case, which assumes strong screening. We also assume scale cuts to account for our uncertainties in the modelling of nonlinear perturbation evolution. We choose a time-dependent form for $\{μ_{\rm mg},Σ_{\rm mg}\}$, with two fiducial sets of values for the corresponding model parameters at the present time, $\{\barμ_0,\barΣ_0\}$, and two forms for $α_{\rm B}$, with one fiducial set of values for each of the model parameters, $α_{\rm B,0}$ and $\{α_{\rm B,0},m\}$. (Abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2025;
originally announced June 2025.
-
Euclid: Constraints on f(R) cosmologies from the spectroscopic and photometric primary probes
Authors:
S. Casas,
V. F. Cardone,
D. Sapone,
N. Frusciante,
F. Pace,
G. Parimbelli,
M. Archidiacono,
K. Koyama,
I. Tutusaus,
S. Camera,
M. Martinelli,
V. Pettorino,
Z. Sakr,
L. Lombriser,
A. Silvestri,
M. Pietroni,
F. Vernizzi,
M. Kunz,
T. Kitching,
A. Pourtsidou,
F. Lacasa,
C. Carbone,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
N. Aghanim,
B. Altieri
, et al. (104 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
$\textit{Euclid}$ will provide a powerful compilation of data including spectroscopic redshifts, the angular clustering of galaxies, weak lensing cosmic shear, and the cross-correlation of these last two photometric observables. In this study we extend recently presented $\textit{Euclid}$ forecasts into the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)…
▽ More
$\textit{Euclid}$ will provide a powerful compilation of data including spectroscopic redshifts, the angular clustering of galaxies, weak lensing cosmic shear, and the cross-correlation of these last two photometric observables. In this study we extend recently presented $\textit{Euclid}$ forecasts into the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$ cosmological model, a popular extension of the Hilbert-Einstein action that introduces an universal modified gravity force in a scale-dependent way. Our aim is to estimate how well future $\textit{Euclid}$ data will be able to constrain the extra parameter of the theory, $f_{R0}$, for the range in which this parameter is still allowed by current observations. For the spectroscopic probe, we use a phenomenological approach for the scale dependence of the growth of perturbations in the terms related to baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions. For the photometric observables, we use a fitting formula that captures the modifications in the non-linear matter power spectrum caused by the $f(R)$ model. We show that, in an optimistic setting, and for a fiducial value of $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-6}$, $\textit{Euclid}$ alone will be able to constrain the additional parameter $\log f_{R0}$ at the $3\%$ level, using spectroscopic galaxy clustering alone; at the $1.4\%$ level, using the combination of photometric probes on their own; and at the $1\%$ level, using the combination of spectroscopic and photometric observations. This last constraint corresponds to an error of the order of $6 \times 10^{-7}$ at the $1σ$ level on the model parameter $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-6}$. We report also forecasted constraints for $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-5}$ and $f_{R0} = 5 \times 10^{-7}$ and show that in the optimistic scenario, $\textit{Euclid}$ will be able to distinguish these models from $Λ\mathrm{CDM}$ at more than 3$σ$. (abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Euclid: Testing the Copernican principle with next-generation surveys
Authors:
D. Camarena,
V. Marra,
Z. Sakr,
S. Nesseris,
A. Da Silva,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
P. Fleury,
L. Lombriser,
M. Martinelli,
C. J. A. P. Martins,
J. Mimoso,
D. Sapone,
C. Clarkson,
S. Camera,
C. Carbone,
S. Casas,
S. Ilić,
V. Pettorino,
I. Tutusaus,
N. Aghanim,
B. Altieri,
A. Amara,
N. Auricchio,
M. Baldi,
D. Bonino
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Copernican principle, the notion that we are not at a special location in the Universe, is one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology and its violation would invalidate the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, causing a major change in our understanding of the Universe. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to perform observational tests of this principle. We determine the preci…
▽ More
The Copernican principle, the notion that we are not at a special location in the Universe, is one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology and its violation would invalidate the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, causing a major change in our understanding of the Universe. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to perform observational tests of this principle. We determine the precision with which future surveys will be able to test the Copernican principle and their ability to detect any possible violations. We forecast constraints on the inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant $Λ$ ($Λ$LTB), basically a cosmological constant $Λ$ and cold dark matter ($Λ$CDM) model, but endowed with a spherical inhomogeneity. We consider combinations of currently available data and simulated Euclid data, together with external data products, based on both $Λ$CDM and $Λ$LTB fiducial models. These constraints are compared to the expectations from the Copernican principle. When considering the $Λ$CDM fiducial model, we find that Euclid data, in combination with other current and forthcoming surveys, will improve the constraints on the Copernican principle by about $30\%$, with $\pm10\%$ variations depending on the observables and scales considered. On the other hand, when considering a $Λ$LTB fiducial model, we find that future Euclid data, combined with other current and forthcoming data sets, will be able to detect Gpc-scale inhomogeneities of contrast $-0.1$. Next-generation surveys, such as Euclid, will thoroughly test homogeneity at large scales, tightening the constraints on possible violations of the Copernican principle.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2022; v1 submitted 20 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the $Λ$CDM model
Authors:
S. Nesseris,
D. Sapone,
M. Martinelli,
D. Camarena,
V. Marra,
Z. Sakr,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
C. J. A. P. Martins,
C. Clarkson,
A. Da Silva,
P. Fleury,
L. Lombriser,
J. P. Mimoso,
S. Casas,
V. Pettorino,
I. Tutusaus,
A. Amara,
N. Auricchio,
C. Bodendorf,
D. Bonino,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia,
V. Capobianco,
C. Carbone,
J. Carretero
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard cosmological model is based on the fundamental assumptions of a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe on large scales. An observational detection of a violation of these assumptions at any redshift would immediately indicate the presence of new physics. We quantify the ability of the Euclid mission, together with contemporary surveys, to improve the current sensitivity of null…
▽ More
The standard cosmological model is based on the fundamental assumptions of a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe on large scales. An observational detection of a violation of these assumptions at any redshift would immediately indicate the presence of new physics. We quantify the ability of the Euclid mission, together with contemporary surveys, to improve the current sensitivity of null tests of the canonical cosmological constant $Λ$ and the cold dark matter (LCDM) model in the redshift range $0<z<1.8$. We considered both currently available data and simulated Euclid and external data products based on a LCDM fiducial model, an evolving dark energy model assuming the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization or an inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant $Λ$ (LLTB), and carried out two separate but complementary analyses: a machine learning reconstruction of the null tests based on genetic algorithms, and a theory-agnostic parametric approach based on Taylor expansion and binning of the data, in order to avoid assumptions about any particular model. We find that in combination with external probes, Euclid can improve current constraints on null tests of the LCDM by approximately a factor of three when using the machine learning approach and by a further factor of two in the case of the parametric approach. However, we also find that in certain cases, the parametric approach may be biased against or missing some features of models far from LCDM. Our analysis highlights the importance of synergies between Euclid and other surveys. These synergies are crucial for providing tighter constraints over an extended redshift range for a plethora of different consistency tests of some of the main assumptions of the current cosmological paradigm.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2022; v1 submitted 21 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Introduction to Volume 15 of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. The Berlin Years: Writings and Correspondence June 1925 - May 1927
Authors:
Diana Kormos Buchwald,
József Illy,
A. J. Kox,
Dennis Lehmkuhl,
Ze'ev Rosenkranz,
Jennifer Nollar James,
Anthony Duncan,
Marco Giovanelli,
Michel Janssen,
Daniel J. Kennefick,
Issachar Unna,
Emily de Araújo,
Rudy Hirschmann,
Nurit Lifshitz,
Barbara Wolff
Abstract:
This volume covers one of the most thrilling two-year periods in twentieth-century physics, as matrix mechanics - developed chiefly by W. Heisenberg, M. Born, and P. Jordan - and wave mechanics - developed by E. Schrödinger - supplanted the earlier quantum theory. The almost one hundred writings by Einstein, of which a third have never been published, and the more than thirteen hundred letters sho…
▽ More
This volume covers one of the most thrilling two-year periods in twentieth-century physics, as matrix mechanics - developed chiefly by W. Heisenberg, M. Born, and P. Jordan - and wave mechanics - developed by E. Schrödinger - supplanted the earlier quantum theory. The almost one hundred writings by Einstein, of which a third have never been published, and the more than thirteen hundred letters show Einstein's immense productivity and hectic pace of life.
Einstein quickly grasps the conceptual peculiarities involved in the new quantum mechanics, such as the difference between Schrödinger's wave function and a field defined in spacetime, or the emerging statistical interpretation of both matrix and wave mechanics. Inspired by correspondence with G. Y. Rainich, he investigates with Jakob Grommer the problem of motion in general relativity, hoping for a hint at a new avenue to unified field theory.
Einstein falls victim to scientific fraud when, in a collaboration with E. Rupp, he becomes convinced that the latter's experiments, aimed at deciding whether excited atoms emit light instantaneously (in quanta) or in a finite time (in waves), confirm a wave-theoretic explanation.
While it was known that the teenage Einstein had been romantically involved with Marie Winteler in 1895, newly discovered documents reveal that his love for Marie was rekindled in 1909-10 while he was still married to Mileva Marić.
The 1925 Locarno Treaties renew Einstein's optimism in European reconciliation. He backs the `International manifesto against compulsory military service' and continues his participation in the League of Nations' International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation. He remains intensely committed to the shaping of the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, although his enthusiasm for this cause is sorely tested.
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
