-
Mass calibration of distant SPT galaxy clusters through expanded weak lensing follow-up observations with HST, VLT & Gemini-South
Authors:
T. Schrabback,
S. Bocquet,
M. Sommer,
H. Zohren,
J. L. van den Busch,
B. Hernández-Martín,
H. Hoekstra,
S. F. Raihan,
M. Schirmer,
D. Applegate,
M. Bayliss,
B. A. Benson,
L. E. Bleem,
J. P. Dietrich,
B. Floyd,
S. Hilbert,
J. Hlavacek-Larrondo,
M. McDonald,
A. Saro,
A. A. Stark,
N. Weissgerber
Abstract:
Expanding from previous work we present weak lensing measurements for a total sample of 30 distant ($z_\mathrm{median}=0.93$) massive galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SPT-SZ) Survey, measuring galaxy shapes in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Advanced Camera for Surveys images. We remove cluster members and preferentially select $z\gtrsim 1.4$ background galaxies via…
▽ More
Expanding from previous work we present weak lensing measurements for a total sample of 30 distant ($z_\mathrm{median}=0.93$) massive galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SPT-SZ) Survey, measuring galaxy shapes in Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Advanced Camera for Surveys images. We remove cluster members and preferentially select $z\gtrsim 1.4$ background galaxies via $V-I$ colour, employing deep photometry from VLT/FORS2 and Gemini-South/GMOS. We apply revised calibrations for the weak lensing shape measurements and the source redshift distribution to estimate the cluster masses. In combination with earlier Magellan/Megacam results for lower-redshifts clusters we infer refined constraints on the scaling relation between the SZ detection significance and the cluster mass, in particular regarding its redshift evolution. The mass scale inferred from the weak lensing data is lower by a factor $0.76^{+0.10}_{-0.14}$ (at our pivot redshift $z=0.6$) compared to what would be needed to reconcile a flat Planck $νΛ$CDM cosmology (in which the sum of the neutrino masses is a free parameter) with the observed SPT-SZ cluster counts. In order to sensitively test the level of (dis-)agreement between SPT clusters and Planck, further expanded weak lensing follow-up samples are needed.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2021; v1 submitted 16 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
Authors:
DES Collaboration,
T. M. C. Abbott,
F. B. Abdalla,
S. Avila,
M. Banerji,
E. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
E. Bertin,
J. Blazek,
S. L. Bridle,
D. Brooks,
D. Brout,
D. L. Burke,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
J. Carretero,
F. J. Castander,
R. Cawthon,
C. Chang,
A. Chen,
M. Crocce,
C. E. Cunha,
L. N. da Costa
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curv…
▽ More
We present constraints on extensions of the minimal cosmological models dominated by dark matter and dark energy, $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM, by using a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing from the first-year data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1) in combination with external data. We consider four extensions of the minimal dark energy-dominated scenarios: 1) nonzero curvature $Ω_k$, 2) number of relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}$ different from the standard value of 3.046, 3) time-varying equation-of-state of dark energy described by the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$ (alternatively quoted by the values at the pivot redshift, $w_p$, and $w_a$), and 4) modified gravity described by the parameters $μ_0$ and $Σ_0$ that modify the metric potentials. We also consider external information from Planck CMB measurements; BAO measurements from SDSS, 6dF, and BOSS; RSD measurements from BOSS; and SNIa information from the Pantheon compilation. Constraints on curvature and the number of relativistic species are dominated by the external data; when these are combined with DES Y1, we find $Ω_k=0.0020^{+0.0037}_{-0.0032}$ at the 68% confidence level, and $N_{\rm eff}<3.28\, (3.55)$ at 68% (95%) confidence. For the time-varying equation-of-state, we find the pivot value $(w_p, w_a)=(-0.91^{+0.19}_{-0.23}, -0.57^{+0.93}_{-1.11})$ at pivot redshift $z_p=0.27$ from DES alone, and $(w_p, w_a)=(-1.01^{+0.04}_{-0.04}, -0.28^{+0.37}_{-0.48})$ at $z_p=0.20$ from DES Y1 combined with external data; in either case we find no evidence for the temporal variation of the equation of state. For modified gravity, we find the present-day value of the relevant parameters to be $Σ_0= 0.43^{+0.28}_{-0.29}$ from DES Y1 alone, and $(Σ_0, μ_0)=(0.06^{+0.08}_{-0.07}, -0.11^{+0.42}_{-0.46})$ from DES Y1 combined with external data, consistent with predictions from GR.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2019; v1 submitted 4 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Supplement: Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the dif…
▽ More
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared wit…
▽ More
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
