A comparison between best-fit eccentricity definitions and the standardized definition of eccentricity
Authors:
Nicolas Chartier,
Md Arif Shaikh,
Hyung Mok Lee,
JeongCho Kim
Abstract:
In the absence of a unique, gauge-independent definition of eccentricity in General Relativity, there have been efforts to standardize the definition for Gravitational-Wave astronomy. Recently, Shaikh et al. proposed a model-independent measurement of eccentricity $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ from the phase evolution of the dominant mode. Many works use loss functions (LFs) to assign eccentricity to a refere…
▽ More
In the absence of a unique, gauge-independent definition of eccentricity in General Relativity, there have been efforts to standardize the definition for Gravitational-Wave astronomy. Recently, Shaikh et al. proposed a model-independent measurement of eccentricity $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ from the phase evolution of the dominant mode. Many works use loss functions (LFs) to assign eccentricity to a reference waveform, for instance by fitting a Post-Newtonian expression to assign eccentricity to Numerical Relativity (NR) simulations. Therefore, we ask whether minimizing common LFs on gauge-dependent model parameters, such as the mismatch $\mathcal{M}$ or the $L_2$-norm of the dominant mode $h_{22}$ residuals, for non-precessing binaries, ensures a sufficient $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ agreement. We use $10$ eccentric NR simulations and the eccentric waveform TEOBResumS-Dali as the parametric model to fit on eccentricity $e_0$ and reference frequency $f_0$. We first show that a minimized mismatch, the $\mathcal{M} \sim 10^{-3}- 10^{-2}$ results in better $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ fractional differences ($\sim 1\%$) than with the minimized $h_{22}$ residuals. Nonetheless, for small eccentricity NR simulations $(e_{\mathrm{gw}} \lesssim 10^{-2}$), the mismatch can favor quasi-circular ($e_0=0$) best-fit models. Thus, with sufficiently long NR simulations, we can include $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ in the LF. We explain why solely fitting with $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ constitutes a degenerate problem. To circumvent these limitations, we propose to minimize a convex sum of $\mathcal{M}$ and the $e_{\mathrm{gw}}$ difference to both assign non-zero eccentric values to NR strains and to control the mismatch threshold.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2025; v1 submitted 25 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
CARPool: fast, accurate computation of large-scale structure statistics by pairing costly and cheap cosmological simulations
Authors:
Nicolas Chartier,
Benjamin Wandelt,
Yashar Akrami,
Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro
Abstract:
To exploit the power of next-generation large-scale structure surveys, ensembles of numerical simulations are necessary to give accurate theoretical predictions of the statistics of observables. High-fidelity simulations come at a towering computational cost. Therefore, approximate but fast simulations, surrogates, are widely used to gain speed at the price of introducing model error. We propose a…
▽ More
To exploit the power of next-generation large-scale structure surveys, ensembles of numerical simulations are necessary to give accurate theoretical predictions of the statistics of observables. High-fidelity simulations come at a towering computational cost. Therefore, approximate but fast simulations, surrogates, are widely used to gain speed at the price of introducing model error. We propose a general method that exploits the correlation between simulations and surrogates to compute fast, reduced-variance statistics of large-scale structure observables without model error at the cost of only a few simulations. We call this approach Convergence Acceleration by Regression and Pooling (CARPool). In numerical experiments with intentionally minimal tuning, we apply CARPool to a handful of GADGET-III $N$-body simulations paired with surrogates computed using COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (COLA). We find $\sim 100$-fold variance reduction even in the non-linear regime, up to $k_\mathrm{max} \approx 1.2$ $h {\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ for the matter power spectrum. CARPool realises similar improvements for the matter bispectrum. In the nearly linear regime CARPool attains far larger sample variance reductions. By comparing to the 15,000 simulations from the Quijote suite, we verify that the CARPool estimates are unbiased, as guaranteed by construction, even though the surrogate misses the simulation truth by up to $60\%$ at high $k$. Furthermore, even with a fully configuration-space statistic like the non-linear matter density probability density function, CARPool achieves unbiased variance reduction factors of up to $\sim 10$, without any further tuning. Conversely, CARPool can be used to remove model error from ensembles of fast surrogates by combining them with a few high-accuracy simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2021; v1 submitted 18 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
