Showing 1–7 of 7 results for author: Yeung, M

Stain Consistency Learning: Handling Stain Variation for Automatic Digital Pathology Segmentation

Authors: Michael Yeung, Todd Watts, Sean YW Tan, Pedro F. Ferreira, Andrew D. Scott, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin, Guang Yang

Abstract: Stain variation is a unique challenge associated with automated analysis of digital pathology. Numerous methods have been developed to improve the robustness of machine learning methods to stain variation, but comparative studies have demonstrated limited benefits to performance. Moreover, methods to handle stain variation were largely developed for H&E stained data, with evaluation generally limi… ▽ More Stain variation is a unique challenge associated with automated analysis of digital pathology. Numerous methods have been developed to improve the robustness of machine learning methods to stain variation, but comparative studies have demonstrated limited benefits to performance. Moreover, methods to handle stain variation were largely developed for H&E stained data, with evaluation generally limited to classification tasks. Here we propose Stain Consistency Learning, a novel framework combining stain-specific augmentation with a stain consistency loss function to learn stain colour invariant features. We perform the first, extensive comparison of methods to handle stain variation for segmentation tasks, comparing ten methods on Masson's trichrome and H&E stained cell and nuclei datasets, respectively. We observed that stain normalisation methods resulted in equivalent or worse performance, while stain augmentation or stain adversarial methods demonstrated improved performance, with the best performance consistently achieved by our proposed approach. The code is available at: https://github.com/mlyg/stain_consistency_learning △ Less

Submitted 11 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Focal Attention Networks: optimising attention for biomedical image segmentation

Authors: Michael Yeung, Leonardo Rundo, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Guang Yang

Abstract: In recent years, there has been increasing interest to incorporate attention into deep learning architectures for biomedical image segmentation. The modular design of attention mechanisms enables flexible integration into convolutional neural network architectures, such as the U-Net. Whether attention is appropriate to use, what type of attention to use, and where in the network to incorporate att… ▽ More In recent years, there has been increasing interest to incorporate attention into deep learning architectures for biomedical image segmentation. The modular design of attention mechanisms enables flexible integration into convolutional neural network architectures, such as the U-Net. Whether attention is appropriate to use, what type of attention to use, and where in the network to incorporate attention modules, are all important considerations that are currently overlooked. In this paper, we investigate the role of the Focal parameter in modulating attention, revealing a link between attention in loss functions and networks. By incorporating a Focal distance penalty term, we extend the Unified Focal loss framework to include boundary-based losses. Furthermore, we develop a simple and interpretable, dataset and model-specific heuristic to integrate the Focal parameter into the Squeeze-and-Excitation block and Attention Gate, achieving optimal performance with fewer number of attention modules on three well-validated biomedical imaging datasets, suggesting judicious use of attention modules results in better performance and efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Incorporating Boundary Uncertainty into loss functions for biomedical image segmentation

Authors: Michael Yeung, Guang Yang, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo

Abstract: Manual segmentation is used as the gold-standard for evaluating neural networks on automated image segmentation tasks. Due to considerable heterogeneity in shapes, colours and textures, demarcating object boundaries is particularly difficult in biomedical images, resulting in significant inter and intra-rater variability. Approaches, such as soft labelling and distance penalty term, apply a global… ▽ More Manual segmentation is used as the gold-standard for evaluating neural networks on automated image segmentation tasks. Due to considerable heterogeneity in shapes, colours and textures, demarcating object boundaries is particularly difficult in biomedical images, resulting in significant inter and intra-rater variability. Approaches, such as soft labelling and distance penalty term, apply a global transformation to the ground truth, redefining the loss function with respect to uncertainty. However, global operations are computationally expensive, and neither approach accurately reflects the uncertainty underlying manual annotation. In this paper, we propose the Boundary Uncertainty, which uses morphological operations to restrict soft labelling to object boundaries, providing an appropriate representation of uncertainty in ground truth labels, and may be adapted to enable robust model training where systematic manual segmentation errors are present. We incorporate Boundary Uncertainty with the Dice loss, achieving consistently improved performance across three well-validated biomedical imaging datasets compared to soft labelling and distance-weighted penalty. Boundary Uncertainty not only more accurately reflects the segmentation process, but it is also efficient, robust to segmentation errors and exhibits better generalisation. △ Less

Submitted 31 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Calibrating the Dice loss to handle neural network overconfidence for biomedical image segmentation

Authors: Michael Yeung, Leonardo Rundo, Yang Nan, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Guang Yang

Abstract: The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) is both a widely used metric and loss function for biomedical image segmentation due to its robustness to class imbalance. However, it is well known that the DSC loss is poorly calibrated, resulting in overconfident predictions that cannot be usefully interpreted in biomedical and clinical practice. Performance is often the only metric used to evaluate segment… ▽ More The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) is both a widely used metric and loss function for biomedical image segmentation due to its robustness to class imbalance. However, it is well known that the DSC loss is poorly calibrated, resulting in overconfident predictions that cannot be usefully interpreted in biomedical and clinical practice. Performance is often the only metric used to evaluate segmentations produced by deep neural networks, and calibration is often neglected. However, calibration is important for translation into biomedical and clinical practice, providing crucial contextual information to model predictions for interpretation by scientists and clinicians. In this study, we provide a simple yet effective extension of the DSC loss, named the DSC++ loss, that selectively modulates the penalty associated with overconfident, incorrect predictions. As a standalone loss function, the DSC++ loss achieves significantly improved calibration over the conventional DSC loss across six well-validated open-source biomedical imaging datasets, including both 2D binary and 3D multi-class segmentation tasks. Similarly, we observe significantly improved calibration when integrating the DSC++ loss into four DSC-based loss functions. Finally, we use softmax thresholding to illustrate that well calibrated outputs enable tailoring of recall-precision bias, which is an important post-processing technique to adapt the model predictions to suit the biomedical or clinical task. The DSC++ loss overcomes the major limitation of the DSC loss, providing a suitable loss function for training deep learning segmentation models for use in biomedical and clinical practice. Source code is available at: https://github.com/mlyg/DicePlusPlus. △ Less

Submitted 1 November, 2022; v1 submitted 31 October, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Focus U-Net: A novel dual attention-gated CNN for polyp segmentation during colonoscopy

Authors: Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo

Abstract: Background: Colonoscopy remains the gold-standard screening for colorectal cancer. However, significant miss rates for polyps have been reported, particularly when there are multiple small adenomas. This presents an opportunity to leverage computer-aided systems to support clinicians and reduce the number of polyps missed. Method: In this work we introduce the Focus U-Net, a novel dual attention… ▽ More Background: Colonoscopy remains the gold-standard screening for colorectal cancer. However, significant miss rates for polyps have been reported, particularly when there are multiple small adenomas. This presents an opportunity to leverage computer-aided systems to support clinicians and reduce the number of polyps missed. Method: In this work we introduce the Focus U-Net, a novel dual attention-gated deep neural network, which combines efficient spatial and channel-based attention into a single Focus Gate module to encourage selective learning of polyp features. The Focus U-Net further incorporates short-range skip connections and deep supervision. Furthermore, we introduce the Hybrid Focal loss, a new compound loss function based on the Focal loss and Focal Tversky loss, to handle class-imbalanced image segmentation. For our experiments, we selected five public datasets containing images of polyps obtained during optical colonoscopy: CVC-ClinicDB, Kvasir-SEG, CVC-ColonDB, ETIS-Larib PolypDB and EndoScene test set. To evaluate model performance, we use the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Intersection over Union (IoU) metrics. Results: Our model achieves state-of-the-art results for both CVC-ClinicDB and Kvasir-SEG, with a mean DSC of 0.941 and 0.910, respectively. When evaluated on a combination of five public polyp datasets, our model similarly achieves state-of-the-art results with a mean DSC of 0.878 and mean IoU of 0.809, a 14% and 15% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art results of 0.768 and 0.702, respectively. Conclusions: This study shows the potential for deep learning to provide fast and accurate polyp segmentation results for use during colonoscopy. The Focus U-Net may be adapted for future use in newer non-invasive screening and more broadly to other biomedical image segmentation tasks involving class imbalance and requiring efficiency. △ Less

Submitted 22 June, 2021; v1 submitted 16 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

ACM Class: I.2.10

Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation

Authors: Michael Yeung, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Leonardo Rundo

Abstract: Automatic segmentation methods are an important advancement in medical image analysis. Machine learning techniques, and deep neural networks in particular, are the state-of-the-art for most medical image segmentation tasks. Issues with class imbalance pose a significant challenge in medical datasets, with lesions often occupying a considerably smaller volume relative to the background. Loss functi… ▽ More Automatic segmentation methods are an important advancement in medical image analysis. Machine learning techniques, and deep neural networks in particular, are the state-of-the-art for most medical image segmentation tasks. Issues with class imbalance pose a significant challenge in medical datasets, with lesions often occupying a considerably smaller volume relative to the background. Loss functions used in the training of deep learning algorithms differ in their robustness to class imbalance, with direct consequences for model convergence. The most commonly used loss functions for segmentation are based on either the cross entropy loss, Dice loss or a combination of the two. We propose the Unified Focal loss, a new hierarchical framework that generalises Dice and cross entropy-based losses for handling class imbalance. We evaluate our proposed loss function on five publicly available, class imbalanced medical imaging datasets: CVC-ClinicDB, Digital Retinal Images for Vessel Extraction (DRIVE), Breast Ultrasound 2017 (BUS2017), Brain Tumour Segmentation 2020 (BraTS20) and Kidney Tumour Segmentation 2019 (KiTS19). We compare our loss function performance against six Dice or cross entropy-based loss functions, across 2D binary, 3D binary and 3D multiclass segmentation tasks, demonstrating that our proposed loss function is robust to class imbalance and consistently outperforms the other loss functions. Source code is available at: https://github.com/mlyg/unified-focal-loss △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2021; v1 submitted 8 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

ACM Class: I.4.6; J.3

Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scans

Authors: Michael Roberts, Derek Driggs, Matthew Thorpe, Julian Gilbey, Michael Yeung, Stephan Ursprung, Angelica I. Aviles-Rivero, Christian Etmann, Cathal McCague, Lucian Beer, Jonathan R. Weir-McCall, Zhongzhao Teng, Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas, James H. F. Rudd, Evis Sala, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb

Abstract: Machine learning methods offer great promise for fast and accurate detection and prognostication of COVID-19 from standard-of-care chest radiographs (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) images. Many articles have been published in 2020 describing new machine learning-based models for both of these tasks, but it is unclear which are of potential clinical utility. In this systematic review, we search… ▽ More Machine learning methods offer great promise for fast and accurate detection and prognostication of COVID-19 from standard-of-care chest radiographs (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) images. Many articles have been published in 2020 describing new machine learning-based models for both of these tasks, but it is unclear which are of potential clinical utility. In this systematic review, we search EMBASE via OVID, MEDLINE via PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv and arXiv for published papers and preprints uploaded from January 1, 2020 to October 3, 2020 which describe new machine learning models for the diagnosis or prognosis of COVID-19 from CXR or CT images. Our search identified 2,212 studies, of which 415 were included after initial screening and, after quality screening, 61 studies were included in this systematic review. Our review finds that none of the models identified are of potential clinical use due to methodological flaws and/or underlying biases. This is a major weakness, given the urgency with which validated COVID-19 models are needed. To address this, we give many recommendations which, if followed, will solve these issues and lead to higher quality model development and well documented manuscripts. △ Less

Submitted 5 January, 2021; v1 submitted 14 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

Comments: 35 pages, 3 figures, 2 tables, updated to the period 1 January 2020 - 3 October 2020

Journal ref: Nature Machine Intelligence 3, 199-217 (2021)