Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Woo, M

Subgroup Performance of a Commercial Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Model for Breast Cancer Detection

Authors: Beatrice Brown-Mulry, Rohan Satya Isaac, Sang Hyup Lee, Ambika Seth, KyungJee Min, Theo Dapamede, Frank Li, Aawez Mansuri, MinJae Woo, Christian Allison Fauria-Robinson, Bhavna Paryani, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Hari Trivedi

Abstract: While research has established the potential of AI models for mammography to improve breast cancer screening outcomes, there have not been any detailed subgroup evaluations performed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of commercial models for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging. This study presents a granular evaluation of the Lunit INSIGHT DBT model on a large retrospective cohort of 1… ▽ More While research has established the potential of AI models for mammography to improve breast cancer screening outcomes, there have not been any detailed subgroup evaluations performed to assess the strengths and weaknesses of commercial models for digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) imaging. This study presents a granular evaluation of the Lunit INSIGHT DBT model on a large retrospective cohort of 163,449 screening mammography exams from the Emory Breast Imaging Dataset (EMBED). Model performance was evaluated in a binary context with various negative exam types (162,081 exams) compared against screen detected cancers (1,368 exams) as the positive class. The analysis was stratified across demographic, imaging, and pathologic subgroups to identify potential disparities. The model achieved an overall AUC of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90-0.92) with a precision of 0.08 (95% CI: 0.08-0.08), and a recall of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.76). Performance was found to be robust across demographics, but cases with non-invasive cancers (AUC: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83-0.87), calcifications (AUC: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.78-0.82), and dense breast tissue (AUC: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88-0.91) were associated with significantly lower performance compared to other groups. These results highlight the need for detailed evaluation of model characteristics and vigilance in considering adoption of new tools for clinical deployment. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2025; originally announced March 2025.

Comments: 14 pages, 7 figures (plus 7 figures in supplement), 3 tables (plus 1 table in supplement)

Image Compression and Decompression Framework Based on Latent Diffusion Model for Breast Mammography

Authors: InChan Hwang, MinJae Woo

Abstract: This research presents a novel framework for the compression and decompression of medical images utilizing the Latent Diffusion Model (LDM). The LDM represents advancement over the denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) with a potential to yield superior image quality while requiring fewer computational resources in the image decompression process. A possible application of LDM and Torchvi… ▽ More This research presents a novel framework for the compression and decompression of medical images utilizing the Latent Diffusion Model (LDM). The LDM represents advancement over the denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM) with a potential to yield superior image quality while requiring fewer computational resources in the image decompression process. A possible application of LDM and Torchvision for image upscaling has been explored using medical image data, serving as an alternative to traditional image compression and decompression algorithms. The experimental outcomes demonstrate that this approach surpasses a conventional file compression algorithm, and convolutional neural network (CNN) models trained with decompressed files perform comparably to those trained with original image files. This approach also significantly reduces dataset size so that it can be distributed with a smaller size, and medical images take up much less space in medical devices. The research implications extend to noise reduction in lossy compression algorithms and substitute for complex wavelet-based lossless algorithms. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 6 pages IEEE conference

Multivariate Analysis on Performance Gaps of Artificial Intelligence Models in Screening Mammography

Authors: Linglin Zhang, Beatrice Brown-Mulry, Vineela Nalla, InChan Hwang, Judy Wawira Gichoya, Aimilia Gastounioti, Imon Banerjee, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari, MinJae Woo, Hari Trivedi

Abstract: Although deep learning models for abnormality classification can perform well in screening mammography, the demographic, imaging, and clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of model failure remain unclear. This retrospective study uses the Emory BrEast Imaging Dataset(EMBED) containing mammograms from 115931 patients imaged at Emory Healthcare between 2013-2020, with BI-RADS asses… ▽ More Although deep learning models for abnormality classification can perform well in screening mammography, the demographic, imaging, and clinical characteristics associated with increased risk of model failure remain unclear. This retrospective study uses the Emory BrEast Imaging Dataset(EMBED) containing mammograms from 115931 patients imaged at Emory Healthcare between 2013-2020, with BI-RADS assessment, region of interest coordinates for abnormalities, imaging features, pathologic outcomes, and patient demographics. Multiple deep learning models were trained to distinguish between abnormal tissue patches and randomly selected normal tissue patches from screening mammograms. We assessed model performance by subgroups defined by age, race, pathologic outcome, tissue density, and imaging characteristics and investigated their associations with false negatives (FN) and false positives (FP). We also performed multivariate logistic regression to control for confounding between subgroups. The top-performing model, ResNet152V2, achieved accuracy of 92.6%(95%CI=92.0-93.2%), and AUC 0.975(95%CI=0.972-0.978). Before controlling for confounding, nearly all subgroups showed statistically significant differences in model performance. However, after controlling for confounding, we found lower FN risk associates with Other race(RR=0.828;p=.050), biopsy-proven benign lesions(RR=0.927;p=.011), and mass(RR=0.921;p=.010) or asymmetry(RR=0.854;p=.040); higher FN risk associates with architectural distortion (RR=1.037;p<.001). Higher FP risk associates to BI-RADS density C(RR=1.891;p<.001) and D(RR=2.486;p<.001). Our results demonstrate subgroup analysis is important in mammogram classifier performance evaluation, and controlling for confounding between subgroups elucidates the true associations between variables and model failure. These results can help guide developing future breast cancer detection models. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; v1 submitted 7 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 29 pages, 6 tables, 7 figures, 2 supplemental tables

The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED): A Racially Diverse, Granular Dataset of 3.5M Screening and Diagnostic Mammograms

Authors: Jiwoong J. Jeong, Brianna L. Vey, Ananth Reddy, Thomas Kim, Thiago Santos, Ramon Correa, Raman Dutt, Marina Mosunjac, Gabriela Oprea-Ilies, Geoffrey Smith, Minjae Woo, Christopher R. McAdams, Mary S. Newell, Imon Banerjee, Judy Gichoya, Hari Trivedi

Abstract: Developing and validating artificial intelligence models in medical imaging requires datasets that are large, granular, and diverse. To date, the majority of publicly available breast imaging datasets lack in one or more of these areas. Models trained on these data may therefore underperform on patient populations or pathologies that have not previously been encountered. The EMory BrEast imaging D… ▽ More Developing and validating artificial intelligence models in medical imaging requires datasets that are large, granular, and diverse. To date, the majority of publicly available breast imaging datasets lack in one or more of these areas. Models trained on these data may therefore underperform on patient populations or pathologies that have not previously been encountered. The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED) addresses these gaps by providing 3650,000 2D and DBT screening and diagnostic mammograms for 116,000 women divided equally between White and African American patients. The dataset also contains 40,000 annotated lesions linked to structured imaging descriptors and 61 ground truth pathologic outcomes grouped into six severity classes. Our goal is to share this dataset with research partners to aid in development and validation of breast AI models that will serve all patients fairly and help decrease bias in medical AI. △ Less

Submitted 8 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Blind Source Separation for NMR Spectra with Negative Intensity

Authors: Ryan J. McCarty, Nimish Ronghe, Mandy Woo, Todd M. Alam

Abstract: NMR spectral datasets, especially in systems with limited samples, can be difficult to interpret if they contain multiple chemical components (phases, polymorphs, molecules, crystals, glasses, etc...) and the possibility of overlapping resonances. In this paper, we benchmark several blind source separation techniques for analysis of NMR spectral datasets containing negative intensity. For benchmar… ▽ More NMR spectral datasets, especially in systems with limited samples, can be difficult to interpret if they contain multiple chemical components (phases, polymorphs, molecules, crystals, glasses, etc...) and the possibility of overlapping resonances. In this paper, we benchmark several blind source separation techniques for analysis of NMR spectral datasets containing negative intensity. For benchmarking purposes, we generated a large synthetic datasbase of quadrupolar solid-state NMR-like spectra that model spin-lattice T1 relaxation or nutation tip/flip angle experiments. Our benchmarking approach focused exclusively on the ability of blind source separation techniques to reproduce the spectra of the underlying pure components. In general, we find that FastICA (Fast Independent Component Analysis), SIMPLISMA (SIMPLe-to-use-Interactive Self-modeling Mixture Analysis), and NNMF (Non-Negative Matrix Factorization) are top-performing techniques. We demonstrate that dataset normalization approaches prior to blind source separation do not considerably improve outcomes. Within the range of noise levels studied, we did not find drastic changes to the ranking of techniques. The accuracy of FastICA and SIMPLISMA degrades quickly if excess (unreal) pure components are predicted. Our results indicate poor performance of SVD (Singular Value Decomposition) methods, and we propose alternative techniques for matrix initialization. The benchmarked techniques are also applied to real solid state NMR datasets. In general, the recommendations from the synthetic datasets agree with the recommendations and results from the real data analysis. The discussion provides some additional recommendations for spectroscopists applying blind source separation to NMR datasets, and for future benchmark studies. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Comments: 28 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables

MSC Class: 62H25 ACM Class: J.2

Domain Knowledge Based Brain Tumor Segmentation and Overall Survival Prediction

Authors: Xiaoqing Guo, Chen Yang, Pak Lun Lam, Peter Y. M. Woo, Yixuan Yuan

Abstract: Automatically segmenting sub-regions of gliomas (necrosis, edema and enhancing tumor) and accurately predicting overall survival (OS) time from multimodal MRI sequences have important clinical significance in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of gliomas. However, due to the high degree variations of heterogeneous appearance and individual physical state, the segmentation of sub-regions and OS pre… ▽ More Automatically segmenting sub-regions of gliomas (necrosis, edema and enhancing tumor) and accurately predicting overall survival (OS) time from multimodal MRI sequences have important clinical significance in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of gliomas. However, due to the high degree variations of heterogeneous appearance and individual physical state, the segmentation of sub-regions and OS prediction are very challenging. To deal with these challenges, we utilize a 3D dilated multi-fiber network (DMFNet) with weighted dice loss for brain tumor segmentation, which incorporates prior volume statistic knowledge and obtains a balance between small and large objects in MRI scans. For OS prediction, we propose a DenseNet based 3D neural network with position encoding convolutional layer (PECL) to extract meaningful features from T1 contrast MRI, T2 MRI and previously segmented subregions. Both labeled data and unlabeled data are utilized to prevent over-fitting for semi-supervised learning. Those learned deep features along with handcrafted features (such as ages, volume of tumor) and position encoding segmentation features are fed to a Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) to predict a specific OS day △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2019; originally announced December 2019.

Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures, BrainLes 2019