Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Wahlström, J

Fifteen Years of Progress at Zero Velocity: A Review

Authors: Johan Wahlström, Isaac Skog

Abstract: Fifteen years have passed since the publication of Foxlin's seminal paper "Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors". In addition to popularizing the zero-velocity update, Foxlin also hinted that the optimal parameter tuning of the zero-velocity detector is dependent on, for example, the user's gait speed. As demonstrated by the recent influx of related studies, the question of how t… ▽ More Fifteen years have passed since the publication of Foxlin's seminal paper "Pedestrian tracking with shoe-mounted inertial sensors". In addition to popularizing the zero-velocity update, Foxlin also hinted that the optimal parameter tuning of the zero-velocity detector is dependent on, for example, the user's gait speed. As demonstrated by the recent influx of related studies, the question of how to properly design a robust zero-velocity detector is still an open research question. In this review, we first recount the history of foot-mounted inertial navigation and characterize the main sources of error, thereby motivating the need for a robust solution. Following this, we systematically analyze current approaches to robust zero-velocity detection, while categorizing public code and data. The article concludes with a discussion on commercialization along with guidance for future research. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

FootSLAM meets Adaptive Thresholding

Authors: Johan Wahlstrom, Andrew Markham, Niki Trigoni

Abstract: Calibration of the zero-velocity detection threshold is an essential prerequisite for zero-velocity-aided inertial navigation. However, the literature is lacking a self-contained calibration method, suitable for large-scale use in unprepared environments without map information or pre-deployed infrastructure. In this paper, the calibration of the zero-velocity detection threshold is formulated as… ▽ More Calibration of the zero-velocity detection threshold is an essential prerequisite for zero-velocity-aided inertial navigation. However, the literature is lacking a self-contained calibration method, suitable for large-scale use in unprepared environments without map information or pre-deployed infrastructure. In this paper, the calibration of the zero-velocity detection threshold is formulated as a maximum likelihood problem. The likelihood function is approximated using estimation quantities readily available from the FootSLAM algorithm. Thus, we obtain a method for adaptive thresholding that does not require map information, measurements from supplementary sensors, or user input. Experimental evaluations are conducted using data with different gait speeds, sensor placements, and walking trajectories. The proposed calibration method is shown to outperform fixed-threshold zero-velocity detectors and a benchmark using a speed-based threshold classifier. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2020; v1 submitted 1 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Sensor Fusion for Magneto-Inductive Navigation

Authors: Johan Wahlström, Manon Kok, Pedro Porto Buarque de Gusmao, Traian E. Abrudan, Niki Trigoni, Andrew Markham

Abstract: Magneto-inductive navigation is an inexpensive and easily deployable solution to many of today's navigation problems. By utilizing very low frequency magnetic fields, magneto-inductive technology circumvents the problems with attenuation and multipath that often plague competing modalities. Using triaxial transmitter and receiver coils, it is possible to compute position and orientation estimates… ▽ More Magneto-inductive navigation is an inexpensive and easily deployable solution to many of today's navigation problems. By utilizing very low frequency magnetic fields, magneto-inductive technology circumvents the problems with attenuation and multipath that often plague competing modalities. Using triaxial transmitter and receiver coils, it is possible to compute position and orientation estimates in three dimensions. However, in many situations, additional information is available that constrains the set of possible solutions. For example, the receiver may be known to be coplanar with the transmitter, or orientation information may be available from inertial sensors. We employ a maximum a posteriori estimator to fuse magneto-inductive signals with such complementary information. Further, we derive the Cramer-Rao bound for the position estimates and investigate the problem of detecting distortions caused by ferrous material. The performance of the estimator is compared to the Cramer-Rao bound and a state-of-the-art estimator using both simulations and real-world data. By fusing magneto-inductive signals with accelerometer measurements, the median position error is reduced almost by a factor of two. △ Less

Submitted 18 September, 2019; originally announced September 2019.

Zero-Velocity Detection - A Bayesian Approach to Adaptive Thresholding

Authors: Johan Wahlström, Isaac Skog, Fredrik Gustafsson, Andrew Markham, Niki Trigoni

Abstract: A Bayesian zero-velocity detector for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems is presented. The detector extends existing zero-velocity detectors based on the likelihood-ratio test, and allows, possibly time-dependent, prior information about the two hypotheses - the sensors being stationary or in motion - to be incorporated into the test. It is also possible to incorporate information about the… ▽ More A Bayesian zero-velocity detector for foot-mounted inertial navigation systems is presented. The detector extends existing zero-velocity detectors based on the likelihood-ratio test, and allows, possibly time-dependent, prior information about the two hypotheses - the sensors being stationary or in motion - to be incorporated into the test. It is also possible to incorporate information about the cost of a missed detection or a false alarm. Specifically, we consider an hypothesis prior based on the velocity estimates provided by the navigation system and an exponential model for how the cost of a missed detection increases with the time since the last zero-velocity update. Thereby, we obtain a detection threshold that adapts to the motion characteristics of the user. Thus, the proposed detection framework efficiently solves one of the key challenges in current zero-velocity-aided inertial navigation systems: the tuning of the zero-velocity detection threshold. A performance evaluation on data with normal and fast gait demonstrates that the proposed detection framework outperforms any detector that chooses two separate fixed thresholds for the two gait speeds. △ Less

Submitted 13 May, 2019; v1 submitted 19 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Map-aided Dead-reckoning --- A Study on Locational Privacy in Insurance Telematics

Authors: Johan Wahlström, Isaac Skog, João G. P. Rodrigues, Peter Händel, Ana Aguiar

Abstract: We present a particle-based framework for estimating the position of a vehicle using map information and measurements of speed. Two measurement functions are considered. The first is based on the assumption that the lateral force on the vehicle does not exceed critical limits derived from physical constraints. The second is based on the assumption that the driver approaches a target speed derived… ▽ More We present a particle-based framework for estimating the position of a vehicle using map information and measurements of speed. Two measurement functions are considered. The first is based on the assumption that the lateral force on the vehicle does not exceed critical limits derived from physical constraints. The second is based on the assumption that the driver approaches a target speed derived from the speed limits along the upcoming trajectory. Performance evaluations of the proposed method indicate that end destinations often can be estimated with an accuracy in the order of $100\,[m]$. These results expose the sensitivity and commercial value of data collected in many of today's insurance telematics programs, and thereby have privacy implications for millions of policyholders. We end by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of different methods for anonymization and privacy preservation in telematics programs. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.