Need for Objective Task-based Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Denoising Methods: A Study in the Context of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT
Authors:
Zitong Yu,
Md Ashequr Rahman,
Richard Laforest,
Thomas H. Schindler,
Robert J. Gropler,
Richard L. Wahl,
Barry A. Siegel,
Abhinav K. Jha
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence-based methods have generated substantial interest in nuclear medicine. An area of significant interest has been using deep-learning (DL)-based approaches for denoising images acquired with lower doses, shorter acquisition times, or both. Objective evaluation of these approaches is essential for clinical application. DL-based approaches for denoising nuclear-medicine images…
▽ More
Artificial intelligence-based methods have generated substantial interest in nuclear medicine. An area of significant interest has been using deep-learning (DL)-based approaches for denoising images acquired with lower doses, shorter acquisition times, or both. Objective evaluation of these approaches is essential for clinical application. DL-based approaches for denoising nuclear-medicine images have typically been evaluated using fidelity-based figures of merit (FoMs) such as RMSE and SSIM. However, these images are acquired for clinical tasks and thus should be evaluated based on their performance in these tasks. Our objectives were to (1) investigate whether evaluation with these FoMs is consistent with objective clinical-task-based evaluation; (2) provide a theoretical analysis for determining the impact of denoising on signal-detection tasks; (3) demonstrate the utility of virtual clinical trials (VCTs) to evaluate DL-based methods. A VCT to evaluate a DL-based method for denoising myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) images was conducted. The impact of DL-based denoising was evaluated using fidelity-based FoMs and AUC, which quantified performance on detecting perfusion defects in MPS images as obtained using a model observer with anthropomorphic channels. Based on fidelity-based FoMs, denoising using the considered DL-based method led to significantly superior performance. However, based on ROC analysis, denoising did not improve, and in fact, often degraded detection-task performance. The results motivate the need for objective task-based evaluation of DL-based denoising approaches. Further, this study shows how VCTs provide a mechanism to conduct such evaluations using VCTs. Finally, our theoretical treatment reveals insights into the reasons for the limited performance of the denoising approach.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2023; v1 submitted 3 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
A Multi-site Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-field Digital Mammography Images and Synthetic Mammography Images
Authors:
Thomas P. Matthews,
Sadanand Singh,
Brent Mombourquette,
Jason Su,
Meet P. Shah,
Stefano Pedemonte,
Aaron Long,
David Maffit,
Jenny Gurney,
Rodrigo Morales Hoil,
Nikita Ghare,
Douglas Smith,
Stephen M. Moore,
Susan C. Marks,
Richard L. Wahl
Abstract:
Purpose: To develop a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density deep learning (DL) model in a multi-site setting for synthetic two-dimensional mammography (SM) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis exams using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images and limited SM data.
Materials and Methods: A DL model was trained to predict BI-RADS breast density using F…
▽ More
Purpose: To develop a Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density deep learning (DL) model in a multi-site setting for synthetic two-dimensional mammography (SM) images derived from digital breast tomosynthesis exams using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) images and limited SM data.
Materials and Methods: A DL model was trained to predict BI-RADS breast density using FFDM images acquired from 2008 to 2017 (Site 1: 57492 patients, 187627 exams, 750752 images) for this retrospective study. The FFDM model was evaluated using SM datasets from two institutions (Site 1: 3842 patients, 3866 exams, 14472 images, acquired from 2016 to 2017; Site 2: 7557 patients, 16283 exams, 63973 images, 2015 to 2019). Each of the three datasets were then split into training, validation, and test datasets. Adaptation methods were investigated to improve performance on the SM datasets and the effect of dataset size on each adaptation method is considered. Statistical significance was assessed using confidence intervals (CI), estimated by bootstrapping.
Results: Without adaptation, the model demonstrated substantial agreement with the original reporting radiologists for all three datasets (Site 1 FFDM: linearly-weighted $κ_w$ = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.76]; Site 1 SM: $κ_w$ = 0.71 [95% CI: 0.64, 0.78]; Site 2 SM: $κ_w$ = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.75]). With adaptation, performance improved for Site 2 (Site 1: $κ_w$ = 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.79], 0.71 vs 0.72, P = .80; Site 2: $κ_w$ = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.76, 0.81], 0.72 vs 0.79, P $<$ .001) using only 500 SM images from that site.
Conclusion: A BI-RADS breast density DL model demonstrated strong performance on FFDM and SM images from two institutions without training on SM images and improved using few SM images.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2020; v1 submitted 23 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
