-
MyData: A Comprehensive Database of Mycetoma Tissue Microscopic Images for Histopathological Analysis
Authors:
Hyam Omar Ali,
Romain Abraham,
Guillaume Desoubeaux,
Ahmed Fahal,
Clovis Tauber
Abstract:
Mycetoma is a chronic and neglected inflammatory disease prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions. It can lead to severe disability and social stigma. The disease is classified into two types based on the causative microorganisms: eumycetoma (fungal) and actinomycetoma (bacterial). Effective treatment strategies depend on accurately identifying the causative agents. Current identification met…
▽ More
Mycetoma is a chronic and neglected inflammatory disease prevalent in tropical and subtropical regions. It can lead to severe disability and social stigma. The disease is classified into two types based on the causative microorganisms: eumycetoma (fungal) and actinomycetoma (bacterial). Effective treatment strategies depend on accurately identifying the causative agents. Current identification methods include molecular, cytological, and histopathological techniques, as well as grain culturing. Among these, histopathological techniques are considered optimal for use in endemic areas, but they require expert pathologists for accurate identification, which can be challenging in rural areas lacking such expertise. The advent of digital pathology and automated image analysis algorithms offers a potential solution. This report introduces a novel dataset designed for the automated detection and classification of mycetoma using histopathological images. It includes the first database of microscopic images of mycetoma tissue, detailing the entire pipeline from species distribution and patient sampling to acquisition protocols through histological procedures. The dataset consists of images from 142 patients, totalling 864 images, each annotated with binary masks indicating the presence of grains, facilitating both detection and segmentation tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results
Authors:
Raghav Mehta,
Angelos Filos,
Ujjwal Baid,
Chiharu Sako,
Richard McKinley,
Michael Rebsamen,
Katrin Datwyler,
Raphael Meier,
Piotr Radojewski,
Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan,
Sahil Nalawade,
Chandan Ganesh,
Ben Wagner,
Fang F. Yu,
Baowei Fei,
Ananth J. Madhuranthakam,
Joseph A. Maldjian,
Laura Daza,
Catalina Gomez,
Pablo Arbelaez,
Chengliang Dai,
Shuo Wang,
Hadrien Reynaud,
Yuan-han Mo,
Elsa Angelini
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying…
▽ More
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at: https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Compartment model-based nonlinear unmixing for kinetic analysis of dynamic PET images
Authors:
Yanna Cruz Cavalcanti,
Thomas Oberlin,
Vinicius Ferraris,
Nicolas Dobigeon,
Maria Ribeiro,
Clovis Tauber
Abstract:
When no arterial input function is available, quantification of dynamic PET images requires a previous step devoted to the extraction of a reference time-activity curve (TAC). Factor analysis is often applied for this purpose. This paper introduces a novel approach that conducts a new kind of nonlinear factor analysis relying on a compartment model, and computes the kinetic parameters of specific…
▽ More
When no arterial input function is available, quantification of dynamic PET images requires a previous step devoted to the extraction of a reference time-activity curve (TAC). Factor analysis is often applied for this purpose. This paper introduces a novel approach that conducts a new kind of nonlinear factor analysis relying on a compartment model, and computes the kinetic parameters of specific binding tissues jointly. To this end, it capitalizes on data-driven parametric imaging methods to provide a physical description of the underlying PET data, directly relating the specific binding with the kinetics of the non-specific binding in the corresponding tissues. This characterization is introduced into the factor analysis formulation to yield a novel nonlinear unmixing model designed for PET image analysis. This model also explicitly introduces global kinetic parameters that allow for a direct estimation of the binding potential with respect to the free fractions in each non-specific binding tissue. The performance of the method is evaluated on synthetic and real data to demonstrate its potential interest.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Factor analysis of dynamic PET images: beyond Gaussian noise
Authors:
Yanna Cruz Cavalcanti,
Thomas Oberlin,
Nicolas Dobigeon,
Cédric Févotte,
Simon Stute,
Maria-Joao Ribeiro,
Clovis Tauber
Abstract:
Factor analysis has proven to be a relevant tool for extracting tissue time-activity curves (TACs) in dynamic PET images, since it allows for an unsupervised analysis of the data. Reliable and interpretable results are possible only if considered with respect to suitable noise statistics. However, the noise in reconstructed dynamic PET images is very difficult to characterize, despite the Poissoni…
▽ More
Factor analysis has proven to be a relevant tool for extracting tissue time-activity curves (TACs) in dynamic PET images, since it allows for an unsupervised analysis of the data. Reliable and interpretable results are possible only if considered with respect to suitable noise statistics. However, the noise in reconstructed dynamic PET images is very difficult to characterize, despite the Poissonian nature of the count-rates. Rather than explicitly modeling the noise distribution, this work proposes to study the relevance of several divergence measures to be used within a factor analysis framework. To this end, the $β$-divergence, widely used in other applicative domains, is considered to design the data-fitting term involved in three different factor models. The performances of the resulting algorithms are evaluated for different values of $β$, in a range covering Gaussian, Poissonian and Gamma-distributed noises. The results obtained on two different types of synthetic images and one real image show the interest of applying non-standard values of $β$ to improve factor analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2019; v1 submitted 30 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
