An automated machine learning framework to optimize radiomics model construction validated on twelve clinical applications
Authors:
Martijn P. A. Starmans,
Sebastian R. van der Voort,
Thomas Phil,
Milea J. M. Timbergen,
Melissa Vos,
Guillaume A. Padmos,
Wouter Kessels,
David Hanff,
Dirk J. Grunhagen,
Cornelis Verhoef,
Stefan Sleijfer,
Martin J. van den Bent,
Marion Smits,
Roy S. Dwarkasing,
Christopher J. Els,
Federico Fiduzi,
Geert J. L. H. van Leenders,
Anela Blazevic,
Johannes Hofland,
Tessa Brabander,
Renza A. H. van Gils,
Gaston J. H. Franssen,
Richard A. Feelders,
Wouter W. de Herder,
Florian E. Buisman
, et al. (21 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Predicting clinical outcomes from medical images using quantitative features (``radiomics'') requires many method design choices, Currently, in new clinical applications, finding the optimal radiomics method out of the wide range of methods relies on a manual, heuristic trial-and-error process. We introduce a novel automated framework that optimizes radiomics workflow construction per application…
▽ More
Predicting clinical outcomes from medical images using quantitative features (``radiomics'') requires many method design choices, Currently, in new clinical applications, finding the optimal radiomics method out of the wide range of methods relies on a manual, heuristic trial-and-error process. We introduce a novel automated framework that optimizes radiomics workflow construction per application by standardizing the radiomics workflow in modular components, including a large collection of algorithms for each component, and formulating a combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization problem. To solve it, we employ automated machine learning through two strategies (random search and Bayesian optimization) and three ensembling approaches. Results show that a medium-sized random search and straight-forward ensembling perform similar to more advanced methods while being more efficient. Validated across twelve clinical applications, our approach outperforms both a radiomics baseline and human experts. Concluding, our framework improves and streamlines radiomics research by fully automatically optimizing radiomics workflow construction. To facilitate reproducibility, we publicly release six datasets, software of the method, and code to reproduce this study.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2025; v1 submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
Differential diagnosis and molecular stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors on CT images using a radiomics approach
Authors:
Martijn P. A. Starmans,
Milea J. M. Timbergen,
Melissa Vos,
Michel Renckens,
Dirk J. Grünhagen,
Geert J. L. H. van Leenders,
Roy S. Dwarkasing,
François E. J. A. Willemssen,
Wiro J. Niessen,
Cornelis Verhoef,
Stefan Sleijfer,
Jacob J. Visser,
Stefan Klein
Abstract:
Distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other intra-abdominal tumors and GISTs molecular analysis is necessary for treatment planning, but challenging due to its rarity. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiomics for distinguishing GISTs from other intra-abdominal tumors, and in GISTs, predict the c-KIT, PDGFRA,BRAF mutational status and mitotic index (MI). All 247 include…
▽ More
Distinguishing gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other intra-abdominal tumors and GISTs molecular analysis is necessary for treatment planning, but challenging due to its rarity. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiomics for distinguishing GISTs from other intra-abdominal tumors, and in GISTs, predict the c-KIT, PDGFRA,BRAF mutational status and mitotic index (MI). All 247 included patients (125 GISTS, 122 non-GISTs) underwent a contrast-enhanced venous phase CT. The GIST vs. non-GIST radiomics model, including imaging, age, sex and location, had a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. Three radiologists had an AUC of 0.69, 0.76, and 0.84, respectively. The radiomics model had an AUC of 0.52 for c-KIT, 0.56 for c-KIT exon 11, and 0.52 for the MI. Hence, our radiomics model was able to distinguish GIST from non-GISTS with a performance similar to three radiologists, but was not able to predict the c-KIT mutation or MI.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2020; v1 submitted 14 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
