Electromagnetic Formation Flying with State and Input Constraints Using Alternating Magnetic Field Forces
Authors:
Sumit S. Kamat,
T. Michael Seigler,
Jesse B. Hoagg
Abstract:
This article presents a feedback control algorithm for electromagnetic formation flying with constraints on the satellites' states and control inputs. The algorithm combines several key techniques. First, we use alternating magnetic field forces to decouple the electromagnetic forces between each pair of satellites in the formation. Each satellite's electromagnetic actuation system is driven by a…
▽ More
This article presents a feedback control algorithm for electromagnetic formation flying with constraints on the satellites' states and control inputs. The algorithm combines several key techniques. First, we use alternating magnetic field forces to decouple the electromagnetic forces between each pair of satellites in the formation. Each satellite's electromagnetic actuation system is driven by a sum of amplitude-modulated sinusoids, where amplitudes are controlled in order to prescribe the time-averaged force between each pair of satellites. Next, the desired time-averaged force is computed from a optimal control that satisfies state constraints (i.e., no collisions and an upper limit on intersatellite speeds) and input constraints (i.e., not exceeding satellite's apparent power capability). The optimal time-averaged force is computed using a single relaxed control barrier function that is obtained by composing multiple control barrier functions that are designed to enforce each state and input constraint. Finally, we demonstrate the satellite formation control method in a numerical simulation.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
The Impact of Reference-Command Preview on Human-in-the-Loop Control Behavior
Authors:
Pedram Rabiee,
S. Alireza Seyyed Mousavi,
Amelia J. S. Sheffler,
Erik Hellström,
Mrdjan Jankovic,
Mario A. Santillo,
T. M. Seigler,
Jesse B. Hoagg
Abstract:
This article presents results from an experiment in which 44 human subjects interact with a dynamic system to perform 40 trials of a command-following task. The reference command is unpredictable and different on each trial, but all subjects have the same sequence of reference commands for the 40 trials. The subjects are divided into 4 groups of 11 subjects. One group performs the command-followin…
▽ More
This article presents results from an experiment in which 44 human subjects interact with a dynamic system to perform 40 trials of a command-following task. The reference command is unpredictable and different on each trial, but all subjects have the same sequence of reference commands for the 40 trials. The subjects are divided into 4 groups of 11 subjects. One group performs the command-following task without preview of the reference command, and the other 3 groups are given preview of the reference command for different time lengths into the future (0.5 s, 1 s, 1.5 s). A subsystem identification algorithm is used to obtain best-fit models of each subject's control behavior on each trial. The time- and frequency-domain performance, as well as the identified models of the control behavior for the 4 groups are examined to investigate the effects of reference-command preview. The results suggest that preview tends to improve performance by allowing the subjects to compensate for sensory time delay and approximate the inverse dynamics in feedforward. However, too much preview may decrease performance by degrading the ability to use the correct phase lead in feedforward.
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
