CrossMoDA 2021 challenge: Benchmark of Cross-Modality Domain Adaptation techniques for Vestibular Schwannoma and Cochlea Segmentation
Authors:
Reuben Dorent,
Aaron Kujawa,
Marina Ivory,
Spyridon Bakas,
Nicola Rieke,
Samuel Joutard,
Ben Glocker,
Jorge Cardoso,
Marc Modat,
Kayhan Batmanghelich,
Arseniy Belkov,
Maria Baldeon Calisto,
Jae Won Choi,
Benoit M. Dawant,
Hexin Dong,
Sergio Escalera,
Yubo Fan,
Lasse Hansen,
Mattias P. Heinrich,
Smriti Joshi,
Victoriya Kashtanova,
Hyeon Gyu Kim,
Satoshi Kondo,
Christian N. Kruse,
Susana K. Lai-Yuen
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Domain Adaptation (DA) has recently raised strong interests in the medical imaging community. While a large variety of DA techniques has been proposed for image segmentation, most of these techniques have been validated either on private datasets or on small publicly available datasets. Moreover, these datasets mostly addressed single-class problems. To tackle these limitations, the Cross-Modality…
▽ More
Domain Adaptation (DA) has recently raised strong interests in the medical imaging community. While a large variety of DA techniques has been proposed for image segmentation, most of these techniques have been validated either on private datasets or on small publicly available datasets. Moreover, these datasets mostly addressed single-class problems. To tackle these limitations, the Cross-Modality Domain Adaptation (crossMoDA) challenge was organised in conjunction with the 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2021). CrossMoDA is the first large and multi-class benchmark for unsupervised cross-modality DA. The challenge's goal is to segment two key brain structures involved in the follow-up and treatment planning of vestibular schwannoma (VS): the VS and the cochleas. Currently, the diagnosis and surveillance in patients with VS are performed using contrast-enhanced T1 (ceT1) MRI. However, there is growing interest in using non-contrast sequences such as high-resolution T2 (hrT2) MRI. Therefore, we created an unsupervised cross-modality segmentation benchmark. The training set provides annotated ceT1 (N=105) and unpaired non-annotated hrT2 (N=105). The aim was to automatically perform unilateral VS and bilateral cochlea segmentation on hrT2 as provided in the testing set (N=137). A total of 16 teams submitted their algorithm for the evaluation phase. The level of performance reached by the top-performing teams is strikingly high (best median Dice - VS:88.4%; Cochleas:85.7%) and close to full supervision (median Dice - VS:92.5%; Cochleas:87.7%). All top-performing methods made use of an image-to-image translation approach to transform the source-domain images into pseudo-target-domain images. A segmentation network was then trained using these generated images and the manual annotations provided for the source image.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2022; v1 submitted 8 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
Common Limitations of Image Processing Metrics: A Picture Story
Authors:
Annika Reinke,
Minu D. Tizabi,
Carole H. Sudre,
Matthias Eisenmann,
Tim Rädsch,
Michael Baumgartner,
Laura Acion,
Michela Antonelli,
Tal Arbel,
Spyridon Bakas,
Peter Bankhead,
Arriel Benis,
Matthew Blaschko,
Florian Buettner,
M. Jorge Cardoso,
Jianxu Chen,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Evangelia Christodoulou,
Beth Cimini,
Gary S. Collins,
Sandy Engelhardt,
Keyvan Farahani,
Luciana Ferrer,
Adrian Galdran,
Bram van Ginneken
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using spe…
▽ More
While the importance of automatic image analysis is continuously increasing, recent meta-research revealed major flaws with respect to algorithm validation. Performance metrics are particularly key for meaningful, objective, and transparent performance assessment and validation of the used automatic algorithms, but relatively little attention has been given to the practical pitfalls when using specific metrics for a given image analysis task. These are typically related to (1) the disregard of inherent metric properties, such as the behaviour in the presence of class imbalance or small target structures, (2) the disregard of inherent data set properties, such as the non-independence of the test cases, and (3) the disregard of the actual biomedical domain interest that the metrics should reflect. This living dynamically document has the purpose to illustrate important limitations of performance metrics commonly applied in the field of image analysis. In this context, it focuses on biomedical image analysis problems that can be phrased as image-level classification, semantic segmentation, instance segmentation, or object detection task. The current version is based on a Delphi process on metrics conducted by an international consortium of image analysis experts from more than 60 institutions worldwide.
△ Less
Submitted 6 December, 2023; v1 submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
