Soft-Output Signal Detection for Cetacean Vocalizations Using Spectral Entropy, K-Means Clustering and the Continuous Wavelet Transform
Authors:
Marco W. Rademan,
Daniel J. Versfeld,
Johan A. du Preez
Abstract:
Underwater acoustic monitoring systems record many hours of audio data for marine research, making fast and reliable non-causal signal detection paramount. Such detectors assist in reducing the amount of labor required for signal annotations, which often contain large portions devoid of signals.
Cetacean vocalization detection based on spectral entropy is investigated as a means of vocalization…
▽ More
Underwater acoustic monitoring systems record many hours of audio data for marine research, making fast and reliable non-causal signal detection paramount. Such detectors assist in reducing the amount of labor required for signal annotations, which often contain large portions devoid of signals.
Cetacean vocalization detection based on spectral entropy is investigated as a means of vocalization discovery. Previous techniques using spectral entropy (SE) mostly consider time-frequency enhancement of the entropy measure, and utilize the STFT as its time-frequency (TF) decomposition. SE methods also requires the user to set a detection threshold manually, which call for knowledge of the produced entropy measures.
This paper considers median filtering as a simple, effective way to provide temporal stabilization to the entropy measure, and considers the CWT as an alternative TF decomposition. K-means clustering is used to determine the threshold required to accurately separate the signal/no-signal entropy measures, resulting in a one-dimensional, two-class classification problem. The class means are used to perform pseudo-probabilistic soft class assignment, which is a useful metric in algorithmic development. The effect of median filtering, signal-to-noise ratio and the chosen TF decomposition are investigated.
The proposed method shows a significant improvement in detection accuracy and specificity, while also providing a more interpretable detection threshold setting via soft class assignment.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2022; v1 submitted 2 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
Efficient approximations of the multi-sensor labelled multi-Bernoulli filter
Authors:
S. C. J. Robertson,
C. E. van Daalen,
J. A. du Preez
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose two efficient, approximate formulations of the multi-sensor labelled multi-Bernoulli (LMB) filter, which both allow the sensors' measurement updates to be computed in parallel. Our first filter is based on the direct mathematical manipulation of the multi-sensor, multi-object Bayes filter's posterior distribution. Unfortunately, it requires the division of probability dis…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose two efficient, approximate formulations of the multi-sensor labelled multi-Bernoulli (LMB) filter, which both allow the sensors' measurement updates to be computed in parallel. Our first filter is based on the direct mathematical manipulation of the multi-sensor, multi-object Bayes filter's posterior distribution. Unfortunately, it requires the division of probability distributions and its extension beyond linear Gaussian applications is not obvious. Our second filter is based on geometric average fusion and it approximates the multi-sensor, multi-object Bayes filter's posterior distribution using the geometric average of each sensor's measurement-updated distribution. This filter can be used under non-linear conditions; however, it is not as accurate as our first filter. In both cases, we approximate the LMB filter's measurement update using an existing loopy belief propagation algorithm. Both filters have a constant complexity in the number of sensors, and linear complexity in both number of measurements and objects. This is an improvement on an iterated-corrector LMB (IC-LMB) filter, which has linear complexity in the number of sensors. The proposed filters are of interest when tracking many objects using several sensors, where filter run-time is more important than filter accuracy. We evaluate both filters' performances on simulated data and the results indicate that the filters' loss of accuracy compared to the IC-LMB filter is not significant.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2022; v1 submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
