Offline Learning of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Controllers for Parkinson Disease Treatment
Authors:
Qitong Gao,
Stephen L. Schimdt,
Afsana Chowdhury,
Guangyu Feng,
Jennifer J. Peters,
Katherine Genty,
Warren M. Grill,
Dennis A. Turner,
Miroslav Pajic
Abstract:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown great promise toward treating motor symptoms caused by Parkinson's disease (PD), by delivering electrical pulses to the Basal Ganglia (BG) region of the brain. However, DBS devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can only deliver continuous DBS (cDBS) stimuli at a fixed amplitude; this energy inefficient operation reduces battery lifet…
▽ More
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown great promise toward treating motor symptoms caused by Parkinson's disease (PD), by delivering electrical pulses to the Basal Ganglia (BG) region of the brain. However, DBS devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can only deliver continuous DBS (cDBS) stimuli at a fixed amplitude; this energy inefficient operation reduces battery lifetime of the device, cannot adapt treatment dynamically for activity, and may cause significant side-effects (e.g., gait impairment). In this work, we introduce an offline reinforcement learning (RL) framework, allowing the use of past clinical data to train an RL policy to adjust the stimulation amplitude in real time, with the goal of reducing energy use while maintaining the same level of treatment (i.e., control) efficacy as cDBS. Moreover, clinical protocols require the safety and performance of such RL controllers to be demonstrated ahead of deployments in patients. Thus, we also introduce an offline policy evaluation (OPE) method to estimate the performance of RL policies using historical data, before deploying them on patients. We evaluated our framework on four PD patients equipped with the RC+S DBS system, employing the RL controllers during monthly clinical visits, with the overall control efficacy evaluated by severity of symptoms (i.e., bradykinesia and tremor), changes in PD biomakers (i.e., local field potentials), and patient ratings. The results from clinical experiments show that our RL-based controller maintains the same level of control efficacy as cDBS, but with significantly reduced stimulation energy. Further, the OPE method is shown effective in accurately estimating and ranking the expected returns of RL controllers.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2023; v1 submitted 5 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
Exit Wavefunction Reconstruction from Single Transmission Electron Micrographs with Deep Learning
Authors:
Jeffrey M. Ede,
Jonathan J. P. Peters,
Jeremy Sloan,
Richard Beanland
Abstract:
Half of wavefunction information is undetected by conventional transmission electron microscopy (CTEM) as only the intensity, and not the phase, of an image is recorded. Following successful applications of deep learning to optical hologram phase recovery, we have developed neural networks to recover phases from CTEM intensities for new datasets containing 98340 exit wavefunctions. Wavefunctions w…
▽ More
Half of wavefunction information is undetected by conventional transmission electron microscopy (CTEM) as only the intensity, and not the phase, of an image is recorded. Following successful applications of deep learning to optical hologram phase recovery, we have developed neural networks to recover phases from CTEM intensities for new datasets containing 98340 exit wavefunctions. Wavefunctions were simulated with clTEM multislice propagation for 12789 materials from the Crystallography Open Database. Our networks can recover 224x224 wavefunctions in ~25 ms for a large range of physical hyperparameters and materials, and we demonstrate that performance improves as the distribution of wavefunctions is restricted. Phase recovery with deep learning overcomes the limitations of traditional methods: it is live, not susceptible to distortions, does not require microscope modification or multiple images, and can be applied to any imaging regime. This paper introduces multiple approaches to CTEM phase recovery with deep learning, and is intended to establish starting points to be improved upon by future research. Source code and links to our new datasets and pre-trained models are available at https://github.com/Jeffrey-Ede/one-shot
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2020; v1 submitted 29 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
