-
Weather-Driven Flexibility Reserve Procurement: A NYISO Offshore Wind Power Case Study
Authors:
Zhirui Liang,
Robert Mieth,
Yury Dvorkin,
Miguel A. Ortega-Vazquez
Abstract:
The growing penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) requires additional flexibility reserve to ensure reliable power system operations. Current industry practice typically assumes a certain fraction of the VRES power production forecast as flexibility reserve, thus ignoring other relevant information, such as weather conditions. To address this, probability- and risk-based reserve…
▽ More
The growing penetration of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) requires additional flexibility reserve to ensure reliable power system operations. Current industry practice typically assumes a certain fraction of the VRES power production forecast as flexibility reserve, thus ignoring other relevant information, such as weather conditions. To address this, probability- and risk-based reserve sizing models have been proposed, which use probabilistic VRES power forecasts that mostly rely on historical forecast and actual VRES power data for model training. Hence, these approaches are not suitable for planned or newly installed wind farms, where no or insufficient historical data is available. This paper addresses this caveat. First, we propose a weather-driven probabilistic forecasting method for wind power installations using publicly available weather data. Second, we apply the resulting probabilistic forecasts to a novel risk-based flexibility reserve sizing model that is compatible with the current reserve procuring pipeline used by US ISOs. Finally, we compare the risk-based reserve requirements to industry practice, state-of-the-art reserve procurement methods, and a weather-ignorant benchmark with respect to system cost and security. Our results are obtained from real-world data on a 1819-bus NYISO system model with both on- and projected off-shore wind power installations, which highlight the usefulness of weather information wind power forecasting and demonstrate efficiency gains from risk-aware reserve procurement.
△ Less
Submitted 10 December, 2022; v1 submitted 1 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Risk-Aware Dimensioning and Procurement of Contingency Reserve
Authors:
Robert Mieth,
Yury Dvorkin,
Miguel A. Ortega-Vazquez
Abstract:
Current contingency reserve criteria ignore the likelihood of individual contingencies and, thus, their impact on system reliability and risk. This paper develops an iterative approach, inspired by the current security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC) practice, enabling system operators to determine risk-cognizant contingency reserve requirements and their allocation with minimal alterations to…
▽ More
Current contingency reserve criteria ignore the likelihood of individual contingencies and, thus, their impact on system reliability and risk. This paper develops an iterative approach, inspired by the current security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC) practice, enabling system operators to determine risk-cognizant contingency reserve requirements and their allocation with minimal alterations to the current SCUC practice. The proposed approach uses generator and transmission system reliability models, including failure-to synchronize and adverse conditions, to compute contingency probabilities, which inform a risk-based system reliability assessment, and ensures reserve deliverability by learning the response of generators to post-contingency states within the SCUC. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated using the Grid Modernization Lab Consortium update of the Reliability Test System.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2022; v1 submitted 31 May, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Participation of an Energy Storage Aggregator in Electricity Markets
Authors:
Jesus E. Contreras-Ocana,
Miguel A. Ortega-Vazquez,
Baosen Zhang
Abstract:
An important function of aggregators is to enable the participation of small energy storage units in electricity markets. This paper studies two generally overlooked aspects related to aggregators of energy storage: i) the relationship between the aggregator and its constituent storage units and ii) the aggregator's effect on system welfare. Regarding i), we show that short-term outcomes can be Pa…
▽ More
An important function of aggregators is to enable the participation of small energy storage units in electricity markets. This paper studies two generally overlooked aspects related to aggregators of energy storage: i) the relationship between the aggregator and its constituent storage units and ii) the aggregator's effect on system welfare. Regarding i), we show that short-term outcomes can be Pareto-inefficient: all players could be better-off. In practice, however, aggregators and storage units are likely to engage in long rather than short-term relationships. Using Nash Bargaining Theory, we show that aggregators and storage units are likely to cooperate in the long-term. A rigorous understanding of the aggregator-storage unit relationship is fundamental to model the aggregator's participation in the market. Regarding ii), we first show that a profit-seeking energy storage aggregator is always beneficial to the system when compared to a system without storage, regardless of size or market power the aggregator may have. However, due to market power, a monopolist aggregator may act in a socially suboptimal manner. We propose a pricing scheme designed to mitigate market power abuse by the aggregator. This pricing scheme has several important characteristics: its formulation requires no private information, it incentivizes a rational aggregator to behave in a socially optimal manner, and allows for regulation of the aggregator's profit.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Cooperation and Competition among Energy Storages
Authors:
Jesus E. Contreras-Ocaña,
Miguel A. Ortega-Vazquez,
Baosen Zhang
Abstract:
We study competition and cooperation among a group of storage units. We show that as the number of storages increases, the profit of storages approaches zero under Nash competition. We propose two ways in which storages can achieve non-zero profit and show that they are optimal in the sense that storages achieve the maximum possible profit. The first is a decentralized approach in which storages a…
▽ More
We study competition and cooperation among a group of storage units. We show that as the number of storages increases, the profit of storages approaches zero under Nash competition. We propose two ways in which storages can achieve non-zero profit and show that they are optimal in the sense that storages achieve the maximum possible profit. The first is a decentralized approach in which storages are exposed to artificial cost functions that incentivize them to behavior as a coalition. No private information needs to be exchanged between the storages to calculate the artificial function. The second is a centralized approach in which an aggregator coordinates and splits profits with storages in order to achieve maximum profit. We use Nash's axiomatic bargaining problem to model and predict the profit split between aggregator and storages.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2016; v1 submitted 6 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
