Automated triaging of head MRI examinations using convolutional neural networks
Authors:
David A. Wood,
Sina Kafiabadi,
Ayisha Al Busaidi,
Emily Guilhem,
Antanas Montvila,
Siddharth Agarwal,
Jeremy Lynch,
Matthew Townend,
Gareth Barker,
Sebastien Ourselin,
James H. Cole,
Thomas C. Booth
Abstract:
The growing demand for head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, along with a global shortage of radiologists, has led to an increase in the time taken to report head MRI scans around the world. For many neurological conditions, this delay can result in increased morbidity and mortality. An automated triaging tool could reduce reporting times for abnormal examinations by identifying abno…
▽ More
The growing demand for head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations, along with a global shortage of radiologists, has led to an increase in the time taken to report head MRI scans around the world. For many neurological conditions, this delay can result in increased morbidity and mortality. An automated triaging tool could reduce reporting times for abnormal examinations by identifying abnormalities at the time of imaging and prioritizing the reporting of these scans. In this work, we present a convolutional neural network for detecting clinically-relevant abnormalities in $\text{T}_2$-weighted head MRI scans. Using a validated neuroradiology report classifier, we generated a labelled dataset of 43,754 scans from two large UK hospitals for model training, and demonstrate accurate classification (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.943) on a test set of 800 scans labelled by a team of neuroradiologists. Importantly, when trained on scans from only a single hospital the model generalized to scans from the other hospital ($Δ$AUC $\leq$ 0.02). A simulation study demonstrated that our model would reduce the mean reporting time for abnormal examinations from 28 days to 14 days and from 9 days to 5 days at the two hospitals, demonstrating feasibility for use in a clinical triage environment.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
Labelling imaging datasets on the basis of neuroradiology reports: a validation study
Authors:
David A. Wood,
Sina Kafiabadi,
Aisha Al Busaidi,
Emily Guilhem,
Jeremy Lynch,
Matthew Townend,
Antanas Montvila,
Juveria Siddiqui,
Naveen Gadapa,
Matthew Benger,
Gareth Barker,
Sebastian Ourselin,
James H. Cole,
Thomas C. Booth
Abstract:
Natural language processing (NLP) shows promise as a means to automate the labelling of hospital-scale neuroradiology magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for computer vision applications. To date, however, there has been no thorough investigation into the validity of this approach, including determining the accuracy of report labels compared to image labels as well as examining the performan…
▽ More
Natural language processing (NLP) shows promise as a means to automate the labelling of hospital-scale neuroradiology magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for computer vision applications. To date, however, there has been no thorough investigation into the validity of this approach, including determining the accuracy of report labels compared to image labels as well as examining the performance of non-specialist labellers. In this work, we draw on the experience of a team of neuroradiologists who labelled over 5000 MRI neuroradiology reports as part of a project to build a dedicated deep learning-based neuroradiology report classifier. We show that, in our experience, assigning binary labels (i.e. normal vs abnormal) to images from reports alone is highly accurate. In contrast to the binary labels, however, the accuracy of more granular labelling is dependent on the category, and we highlight reasons for this discrepancy. We also show that downstream model performance is reduced when labelling of training reports is performed by a non-specialist. To allow other researchers to accelerate their research, we make our refined abnormality definitions and labelling rules available, as well as our easy-to-use radiology report labelling app which helps streamline this process.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2021; v1 submitted 8 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
