-
A Comprehensive Review of Myoelectric Prosthesis Control
Authors:
Mohammad Reza Mohebbian,
Marjan Nosouhi,
Farzaneh Fazilati,
Zahra Nasr Esfahani,
Golnaz Amiri,
Negar Malekifar,
Fatemeh Yusefi,
Mohsen Rastegari,
Hamid Reza Marateb
Abstract:
Prosthetic hands can be used to support upper-body amputees. Myoelectric prosthesis, one of the externally-powered active prosthesis categories, requires proper processing units in addition to recording electrodes and instrumentation amplifiers. In this paper, the following myoelectric prosthesis control methods were discussed in detail: On-off and finite-state, proportional, direct, and posture,…
▽ More
Prosthetic hands can be used to support upper-body amputees. Myoelectric prosthesis, one of the externally-powered active prosthesis categories, requires proper processing units in addition to recording electrodes and instrumentation amplifiers. In this paper, the following myoelectric prosthesis control methods were discussed in detail: On-off and finite-state, proportional, direct, and posture, simultaneous, classification and regression-based control, and deep learning methods. Myoelectric control performance indices, such as completion time and rate, throughput, lag, and path length, were reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of the control methods were also discussed. Some of myoelectric prosthesis control's significant challenges are comfort, durability, cost, the application of under-sampled signals, and electrode shift. Moreover, the proposed algorithms must be usually tuned after each don and doff, which is not comfortable for the users. Real-time simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control, resampling human's arm, has brought much attention. However, increasing the degree of freedom reduces the overall performance. Applying a 3D printed prosthesis arm and under-sampled electromyographic signals could reduce the fabrication cost and improve the application of such methods in practice. There are many technological and clinical challenges in this area to reduce the prosthesis rejection rate.
△ Less
Submitted 25 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Which K-Space Sampling Schemes is good for Motion Artifact Detection in Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
Authors:
Mohammad Reza Mohebbian,
Ekta Walia,
Khan A. Wahid
Abstract:
Motion artifacts are a common occurrence in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam. Motion during acquisition has a profound impact on workflow efficiency, often requiring a repeat of sequences. Furthermore, motion artifacts may escape notice by technologists, only to be revealed at the time of reading by the radiologists, affecting their diagnostic quality. Designing a computer-aided tool for…
▽ More
Motion artifacts are a common occurrence in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) exam. Motion during acquisition has a profound impact on workflow efficiency, often requiring a repeat of sequences. Furthermore, motion artifacts may escape notice by technologists, only to be revealed at the time of reading by the radiologists, affecting their diagnostic quality. Designing a computer-aided tool for automatic motion detection and elimination can improve the diagnosis, however, it needs a deep understanding of motion characteristics. Motion artifacts in MRI have a complex nature and it is directly related to the k-space sampling scheme. In this study we investigate the effect of three conventional k-space samplers, including Cartesian, Uniform Spiral and Radial on motion induced image distortion. In this regard, various synthetic motions with different trajectories of displacement and rotation are applied to T1 and T2-weighted MRI images, and a convolutional neural network is trained to show the difficulty of motion classification. The results show that the spiral k-space sampling method get less effect of motion artifact in image space as compared to radial k-space sampled images, and radial k-space sampled images are more robust than Cartesian ones. Cartesian samplers, on the other hand, are the best in terms of deep learning motion detection because they can better reflect motion.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Fetal ECG Extraction from Maternal ECG using Attention-based CycleGAN
Authors:
Mohammad Reza Mohebbian,
Seyed Shahim Vedaei,
Khan A. Wahid,
Anh Dinh,
Hamid Reza Marateb,
Kouhyar Tavakolian
Abstract:
Non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) is used to monitor the electrical pulse of the fetal heart. Decomposing the FECG signal from maternal ECG (MECG) is a blind source separation problem, which is hard due to the low amplitude of FECG, the overlap of R waves, and the potential exposure to noise from different sources. Traditional decomposition techniques, such as adaptive filters, require t…
▽ More
Non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (FECG) is used to monitor the electrical pulse of the fetal heart. Decomposing the FECG signal from maternal ECG (MECG) is a blind source separation problem, which is hard due to the low amplitude of FECG, the overlap of R waves, and the potential exposure to noise from different sources. Traditional decomposition techniques, such as adaptive filters, require tuning, alignment, or pre-configuration, such as modeling the noise or desired signal. to map MECG to FECG efficiently. The high correlation between maternal and fetal ECG parts decreases the performance of convolution layers. Therefore, the masking region of interest using the attention mechanism is performed for improving signal generators' precision. The sine activation function is also used since it could retain more details when converting two signal domains. Three available datasets from the Physionet, including A&D FECG, NI-FECG, and NI-FECG challenge, and one synthetic dataset using FECGSYN toolbox, are used to evaluate the performance. The proposed method could map abdominal MECG to scalp FECG with an average 98% R-Square [CI 95%: 97%, 99%] as the goodness of fit on A&D FECG dataset. Moreover, it achieved 99.7 % F1-score [CI 95%: 97.8-99.9], 99.6% F1-score [CI 95%: 98.2%, 99.9%] and 99.3% F1-score [CI 95%: 95.3%, 99.9%] for fetal QRS detection on, A&D FECG, NI-FECG and NI-FECG challenge datasets, respectively. These results are comparable to the state-of-the-art; thus, the proposed algorithm has the potential of being used for high-performance signal-to-signal conversion.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2021; v1 submitted 22 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
