-
From Embeddings to Accuracy: Comparing Foundation Models for Radiographic Classification
Authors:
Xue Li,
Jameson Merkow,
Noel C. F. Codella,
Alberto Santamaria-Pang,
Naiteek Sangani,
Alexander Ersoy,
Christopher Burt,
John W. Garrett,
Richard J. Bruce,
Joshua D. Warner,
Tyler Bradshaw,
Ivan Tarapov,
Matthew P. Lungren,
Alan B. McMillan
Abstract:
Foundation models, pretrained on extensive datasets, have significantly advanced machine learning by providing robust and transferable embeddings applicable to various domains, including medical imaging diagnostics. This study evaluates the utility of embeddings derived from both general-purpose and medical domain-specific foundation models for training lightweight adapter models in multi-class ra…
▽ More
Foundation models, pretrained on extensive datasets, have significantly advanced machine learning by providing robust and transferable embeddings applicable to various domains, including medical imaging diagnostics. This study evaluates the utility of embeddings derived from both general-purpose and medical domain-specific foundation models for training lightweight adapter models in multi-class radiography classification, focusing specifically on tube placement assessment. A dataset comprising 8842 radiographs classified into seven distinct categories was employed to extract embeddings using six foundation models: DenseNet121, BiomedCLIP, Med-Flamingo, MedImageInsight, Rad-DINO, and CXR-Foundation. Adapter models were subsequently trained using classical machine learning algorithms. Among these combinations, MedImageInsight embeddings paired with an support vector machine adapter yielded the highest mean area under the curve (mAUC) at 93.8%, followed closely by Rad-DINO (91.1%) and CXR-Foundation (89.0%). In comparison, BiomedCLIP and DenseNet121 exhibited moderate performance with mAUC scores of 83.0% and 81.8%, respectively, whereas Med-Flamingo delivered the lowest performance at 75.1%. Notably, most adapter models demonstrated computational efficiency, achieving training within one minute and inference within seconds on CPU, underscoring their practicality for clinical applications. Furthermore, fairness analyses on adapters trained on MedImageInsight-derived embeddings indicated minimal disparities, with gender differences in performance within 2% and standard deviations across age groups not exceeding 3%. These findings confirm that foundation model embeddings-especially those from MedImageInsight-facilitate accurate, computationally efficient, and equitable diagnostic classification using lightweight adapters for radiographic image analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Scalable Drift Monitoring in Medical Imaging AI
Authors:
Jameson Merkow,
Felix J. Dorfner,
Xiyu Yang,
Alexander Ersoy,
Giridhar Dasegowda,
Mannudeep Kalra,
Matthew P. Lungren,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Ivan Tarapov
Abstract:
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical imaging has advanced clinical diagnostics but poses challenges in managing model drift and ensuring long-term reliability. To address these challenges, we develop MMC+, an enhanced framework for scalable drift monitoring, building upon the CheXstray framework that introduced real-time drift detection for medical imaging AI models using m…
▽ More
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into medical imaging has advanced clinical diagnostics but poses challenges in managing model drift and ensuring long-term reliability. To address these challenges, we develop MMC+, an enhanced framework for scalable drift monitoring, building upon the CheXstray framework that introduced real-time drift detection for medical imaging AI models using multi-modal data concordance. This work extends the original framework's methodologies, providing a more scalable and adaptable solution for real-world healthcare settings and offers a reliable and cost-effective alternative to continuous performance monitoring addressing limitations of both continuous and periodic monitoring methods. MMC+ introduces critical improvements to the original framework, including more robust handling of diverse data streams, improved scalability with the integration of foundation models like MedImageInsight for high-dimensional image embeddings without site-specific training, and the introduction of uncertainty bounds to better capture drift in dynamic clinical environments. Validated with real-world data from Massachusetts General Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic, MMC+ effectively detects significant data shifts and correlates them with model performance changes. While not directly predicting performance degradation, MMC+ serves as an early warning system, indicating when AI systems may deviate from acceptable performance bounds and enabling timely interventions. By emphasizing the importance of monitoring diverse data streams and evaluating data shifts alongside model performance, this work contributes to the broader adoption and integration of AI solutions in clinical settings.
△ Less
Submitted 18 October, 2024; v1 submitted 16 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
CheXstray: Real-time Multi-Modal Data Concordance for Drift Detection in Medical Imaging AI
Authors:
Arjun Soin,
Jameson Merkow,
Jin Long,
Joseph Paul Cohen,
Smitha Saligrama,
Stephen Kaiser,
Steven Borg,
Ivan Tarapov,
Matthew P Lungren
Abstract:
Clinical Artificial lntelligence (AI) applications are rapidly expanding worldwide, and have the potential to impact to all areas of medical practice. Medical imaging applications constitute a vast majority of approved clinical AI applications. Though healthcare systems are eager to adopt AI solutions a fundamental question remains: \textit{what happens after the AI model goes into production?} We…
▽ More
Clinical Artificial lntelligence (AI) applications are rapidly expanding worldwide, and have the potential to impact to all areas of medical practice. Medical imaging applications constitute a vast majority of approved clinical AI applications. Though healthcare systems are eager to adopt AI solutions a fundamental question remains: \textit{what happens after the AI model goes into production?} We use the CheXpert and PadChest public datasets to build and test a medical imaging AI drift monitoring workflow to track data and model drift without contemporaneous ground truth. We simulate drift in multiple experiments to compare model performance with our novel multi-modal drift metric, which uses DICOM metadata, image appearance representation from a variational autoencoder (VAE), and model output probabilities as input. Through experimentation, we demonstrate a strong proxy for ground truth performance using unsupervised distributional shifts in relevant metadata, predicted probabilities, and VAE latent representation. Our key contributions include (1) proof-of-concept for medical imaging drift detection that includes the use of VAE and domain specific statistical methods, (2) a multi-modal methodology to measure and unify drift metrics, (3) new insights into the challenges and solutions to observe deployed medical imaging AI, and (4) creation of open-source tools that enable others to easily run their own workflows and scenarios. This work has important implications. It addresses the concerning translation gap found in continuous medical imaging AI model monitoring common in dynamic healthcare environments.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2022; v1 submitted 6 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
