-
The ACROBAT 2022 Challenge: Automatic Registration Of Breast Cancer Tissue
Authors:
Philippe Weitz,
Masi Valkonen,
Leslie Solorzano,
Circe Carr,
Kimmo Kartasalo,
Constance Boissin,
Sonja Koivukoski,
Aino Kuusela,
Dusan Rasic,
Yanbo Feng,
Sandra Sinius Pouplier,
Abhinav Sharma,
Kajsa Ledesma Eriksson,
Stephanie Robertson,
Christian Marzahl,
Chandler D. Gatenbee,
Alexander R. A. Anderson,
Marek Wodzinski,
Artur Jurgas,
Niccolò Marini,
Manfredo Atzori,
Henning Müller,
Daniel Budelmann,
Nick Weiss,
Stefan Heldmann
, et al. (16 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration…
▽ More
The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration dataset to date, including 4,212 WSIs from 1,152 breast cancer patients. The challenge objective was to align WSIs of tissue that was stained with routine diagnostic immunohistochemistry to its H&E-stained counterpart. We compare the performance of eight WSI registration algorithms, including an investigation of the impact of different WSI properties and clinical covariates. We find that conceptually distinct WSI registration methods can lead to highly accurate registration performances and identify covariates that impact performances across methods. These results establish the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration and guide researchers in selecting and developing methods.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Mitosis domain generalization in histopathology images -- The MIDOG challenge
Authors:
Marc Aubreville,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Christof A. Bertram,
Robert Klopleisch,
Natalie ter Hoeve,
Francesco Ciompi,
Frauke Wilm,
Christian Marzahl,
Taryn A. Donovan,
Andreas Maier,
Jack Breen,
Nishant Ravikumar,
Youjin Chung,
Jinah Park,
Ramin Nateghi,
Fattaneh Pourakpour,
Rutger H. J. Fick,
Saima Ben Hadj,
Mostafa Jahanifar,
Nasir Rajpoot,
Jakob Dexl,
Thomas Wittenberg,
Satoshi Kondo,
Maxime W. Lafarge,
Viktor H. Koelzer
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly…
▽ More
The density of mitotic figures within tumor tissue is known to be highly correlated with tumor proliferation and thus is an important marker in tumor grading. Recognition of mitotic figures by pathologists is known to be subject to a strong inter-rater bias, which limits the prognostic value. State-of-the-art deep learning methods can support the expert in this assessment but are known to strongly deteriorate when applied in a different clinical environment than was used for training. One decisive component in the underlying domain shift has been identified as the variability caused by using different whole slide scanners. The goal of the MICCAI MIDOG 2021 challenge has been to propose and evaluate methods that counter this domain shift and derive scanner-agnostic mitosis detection algorithms. The challenge used a training set of 200 cases, split across four scanning systems. As a test set, an additional 100 cases split across four scanning systems, including two previously unseen scanners, were given. The best approaches performed on an expert level, with the winning algorithm yielding an F_1 score of 0.748 (CI95: 0.704-0.781). In this paper, we evaluate and compare the approaches that were submitted to the challenge and identify methodological factors contributing to better performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Pan-tumor CAnine cuTaneous Cancer Histology (CATCH) dataset
Authors:
Frauke Wilm,
Marco Fragoso,
Christian Marzahl,
Jingna Qiu,
Chloé Puget,
Laura Diehl,
Christof A. Bertram,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Andreas Maier,
Katharina Breininger,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
Due to morphological similarities, the differentiation of histologic sections of cutaneous tumors into individual subtypes can be challenging. Recently, deep learning-based approaches have proven their potential for supporting pathologists in this regard. However, many of these supervised algorithms require a large amount of annotated data for robust development. We present a publicly available da…
▽ More
Due to morphological similarities, the differentiation of histologic sections of cutaneous tumors into individual subtypes can be challenging. Recently, deep learning-based approaches have proven their potential for supporting pathologists in this regard. However, many of these supervised algorithms require a large amount of annotated data for robust development. We present a publicly available dataset of 350 whole slide images of seven different canine cutaneous tumors complemented by 12,424 polygon annotations for 13 histologic classes, including seven cutaneous tumor subtypes. In inter-rater experiments, we show a high consistency of the provided labels, especially for tumor annotations. We further validate the dataset by training a deep neural network for the task of tissue segmentation and tumor subtype classification. We achieve a class-averaged Jaccard coefficient of 0.7047, and 0.9044 for tumor in particular. For classification, we achieve a slide-level accuracy of 0.9857. Since canine cutaneous tumors possess various histologic homologies to human tumors the added value of this dataset is not limited to veterinary pathology but extends to more general fields of application.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2022; v1 submitted 27 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
First steps on Gamification of Lung Fluid Cells Annotations in the Flower Domain
Authors:
Sonja Kunzmann,
Christian Marzahl,
Felix Denzinger,
Christof A. Bertram,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Katharina Breininger,
Vincent Christlein,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Annotating data, especially in the medical domain, requires expert knowledge and a lot of effort. This limits the amount and/or usefulness of available medical data sets for experimentation. Therefore, developing strategies to increase the number of annotations while lowering the needed domain knowledge is of interest. A possible strategy is the use of gamification, i.e. transforming the annotatio…
▽ More
Annotating data, especially in the medical domain, requires expert knowledge and a lot of effort. This limits the amount and/or usefulness of available medical data sets for experimentation. Therefore, developing strategies to increase the number of annotations while lowering the needed domain knowledge is of interest. A possible strategy is the use of gamification, i.e. transforming the annotation task into a game. We propose an approach to gamify the task of annotating lung fluid cells from pathological whole slide images (WSIs). As the domain is unknown to non-expert annotators, we transform images of cells to the domain of flower images using a CycleGAN architecture. In this more assessable domain, non-expert annotators can be (t)asked to annotate different kinds of flowers in a playful setting. In order to provide a proof of concept, this work shows that the domain transfer is possible by evaluating an image classification network trained on real cell images and tested on the cell images generated by the CycleGAN network (reconstructed cell images) as well as real cell images. The classification network reaches an average accuracy of 94.73 % on the original lung fluid cells and 95.25 % on the transformed lung fluid cells, respectively. Our study lays the foundation for future research on gamification using CycleGANs.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2022; v1 submitted 5 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Domain Adversarial RetinaNet as a Reference Algorithm for the MItosis DOmain Generalization Challenge
Authors:
Frauke Wilm,
Christian Marzahl,
Katharina Breininger,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
Assessing the Mitotic Count has a known high degree of intra- and inter-rater variability. Computer-aided systems have proven to decrease this variability and reduce labeling time. These systems, however, are generally highly dependent on their training domain and show poor applicability to unseen domains. In histopathology, these domain shifts can result from various sources, including different…
▽ More
Assessing the Mitotic Count has a known high degree of intra- and inter-rater variability. Computer-aided systems have proven to decrease this variability and reduce labeling time. These systems, however, are generally highly dependent on their training domain and show poor applicability to unseen domains. In histopathology, these domain shifts can result from various sources, including different slide scanning systems used to digitize histologic samples. The MItosis DOmain Generalization challenge focused on this specific domain shift for the task of mitotic figure detection. This work presents a mitotic figure detection algorithm developed as a baseline for the challenge, based on domain adversarial training. On the challenge's test set, the algorithm scored an F$_1$ score of 0.7183. The corresponding network weights and code for implementing the network are made publicly available.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2022; v1 submitted 25 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Inter-Species Cell Detection: Datasets on pulmonary hemosiderophages in equine, human and feline specimens
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Jenny Hill,
Jason Stayt,
Dorothee Bienzle,
Lutz Welker,
Frauke Wilm,
Jörn Voigt,
Marc Aubreville,
Andreas Maier,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Katharina Breininger,
Christof A. Bertram
Abstract:
Pulmonary hemorrhage (P-Hem) occurs among multiple species and can have various causes. Cytology of bronchoalveolarlavage fluid (BALF) using a 5-tier scoring system of alveolar macrophages based on their hemosiderin content is considered the most sensitive diagnostic method. We introduce a novel, fully annotated multi-species P-Hem dataset which consists of 74 cytology whole slide images (WSIs) wi…
▽ More
Pulmonary hemorrhage (P-Hem) occurs among multiple species and can have various causes. Cytology of bronchoalveolarlavage fluid (BALF) using a 5-tier scoring system of alveolar macrophages based on their hemosiderin content is considered the most sensitive diagnostic method. We introduce a novel, fully annotated multi-species P-Hem dataset which consists of 74 cytology whole slide images (WSIs) with equine, feline and human samples. To create this high-quality and high-quantity dataset, we developed an annotation pipeline combining human expertise with deep learning and data visualisation techniques. We applied a deep learning-based object detection approach trained on 17 expertly annotated equine WSIs, to the remaining 39 equine, 12 human and 7 feline WSIs. The resulting annotations were semi-automatically screened for errors on multiple types of specialised annotation maps and finally reviewed by a trained pathologists. Our dataset contains a total of 297,383 hemosiderophages classified into five grades. It is one of the largest publicly availableWSIs datasets with respect to the number of annotations, the scanned area and the number of species covered.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Learning to be EXACT, Cell Detection for Asthma on Partially Annotated Whole Slide Images
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Christof A. Bertram,
Frauke Wilm,
Jörn Voigt,
Ann K. Barton,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Katharina Breininger,
Andreas Maier,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the lower respiratory tract and naturally occurs in humans and animals including horses. The annotation of an asthma microscopy whole slide image (WSI) is an extremely labour-intensive task due to the hundreds of thousands of cells per WSI. To overcome the limitation of annotating WSI incompletely, we developed a training pipeline which can train a deep…
▽ More
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the lower respiratory tract and naturally occurs in humans and animals including horses. The annotation of an asthma microscopy whole slide image (WSI) is an extremely labour-intensive task due to the hundreds of thousands of cells per WSI. To overcome the limitation of annotating WSI incompletely, we developed a training pipeline which can train a deep learning-based object detection model with partially annotated WSIs and compensate class imbalances on the fly. With this approach we can freely sample from annotated WSIs areas and are not restricted to fully annotated extracted sub-images of the WSI as with classical approaches. We evaluated our pipeline in a cross-validation setup with a fixed training set using a dataset of six equine WSIs of which four are partially annotated and used for training, and two fully annotated WSI are used for validation and testing. Our WSI-based training approach outperformed classical sub-image-based training methods by up to 15\% $mAP$ and yielded human-like performance when compared to the annotations of ten trained pathologists.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Are pathologist-defined labels reproducible? Comparison of the TUPAC16 mitotic figure dataset with an alternative set of labels
Authors:
Christof A. Bertram,
Mitko Veta,
Christian Marzahl,
Nikolas Stathonikos,
Andreas Maier,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Marc Aubreville
Abstract:
Pathologist-defined labels are the gold standard for histopathological data sets, regardless of well-known limitations in consistency for some tasks. To date, some datasets on mitotic figures are available and were used for development of promising deep learning-based algorithms. In order to assess robustness of those algorithms and reproducibility of their methods it is necessary to test on sever…
▽ More
Pathologist-defined labels are the gold standard for histopathological data sets, regardless of well-known limitations in consistency for some tasks. To date, some datasets on mitotic figures are available and were used for development of promising deep learning-based algorithms. In order to assess robustness of those algorithms and reproducibility of their methods it is necessary to test on several independent datasets. The influence of different labeling methods of these available datasets is currently unknown. To tackle this, we present an alternative set of labels for the images of the auxiliary mitosis dataset of the TUPAC16 challenge. Additional to manual mitotic figure screening, we used a novel, algorithm-aided labeling process, that allowed to minimize the risk of missing rare mitotic figures in the images. All potential mitotic figures were independently assessed by two pathologists. The novel, publicly available set of labels contains 1,999 mitotic figures (+28.80%) and additionally includes 10,483 labels of cells with high similarities to mitotic figures (hard examples). We found significant difference comparing F_1 scores between the original label set (0.549) and the new alternative label set (0.735) using a standard deep learning object detection architecture. The models trained on the alternative set showed higher overall confidence values, suggesting a higher overall label consistency. Findings of the present study show that pathologists-defined labels may vary significantly resulting in notable difference in the model performance. Comparison of deep learning-based algorithms between independent datasets with different labeling methods should be done with caution.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
EXACT: A collaboration toolset for algorithm-aided annotation of images with annotation version control
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Marc Aubreville,
Christof A. Bertram,
Jennifer Maier,
Christian Bergler,
Christine Kröger,
Jörn Voigt,
Katharina Breininger,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
In many research areas, scientific progress is accelerated by multidisciplinary access to image data and their interdisciplinary annotation. However, keeping track of these annotations to ensure a high-quality multi-purpose data set is a challenging and labour intensive task. We developed the open-source online platform EXACT (EXpert Algorithm Collaboration Tool) that enables the collaborative int…
▽ More
In many research areas, scientific progress is accelerated by multidisciplinary access to image data and their interdisciplinary annotation. However, keeping track of these annotations to ensure a high-quality multi-purpose data set is a challenging and labour intensive task. We developed the open-source online platform EXACT (EXpert Algorithm Collaboration Tool) that enables the collaborative interdisciplinary analysis of images from different domains online and offline. EXACT supports multi-gigapixel medical whole slide images as well as image series with thousands of images. The software utilises a flexible plugin system that can be adapted to diverse applications such as counting mitotic figures with a screening mode, finding false annotations on a novel validation view, or using the latest deep learning image analysis technologies. This is combined with a version control system which makes it possible to keep track of changes in the data sets and, for example, to link the results of deep learning experiments to specific data set versions. EXACT is freely available and has already been successfully applied to a broad range of annotation tasks, including highly diverse applications like deep learning supported cytology scoring, interdisciplinary multi-centre whole slide image tumour annotation, and highly specialised whale sound spectroscopy clustering.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2021; v1 submitted 30 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Are fast labeling methods reliable? A case study of computer-aided expert annotations on microscopy slides
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Christof A. Bertram,
Marc Aubreville,
Anne Petrick,
Kristina Weiler,
Agnes C. Gläsel,
Marco Fragoso,
Sophie Merz,
Florian Bartenschlager,
Judith Hoppe,
Alina Langenhagen,
Anne Jasensky,
Jörn Voigt,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Deep-learning-based pipelines have shown the potential to revolutionalize microscopy image diagnostics by providing visual augmentations to a trained pathology expert. However, to match human performance, the methods rely on the availability of vast amounts of high-quality labeled data, which poses a significant challenge. To circumvent this, augmented labeling methods, also known as expert-algori…
▽ More
Deep-learning-based pipelines have shown the potential to revolutionalize microscopy image diagnostics by providing visual augmentations to a trained pathology expert. However, to match human performance, the methods rely on the availability of vast amounts of high-quality labeled data, which poses a significant challenge. To circumvent this, augmented labeling methods, also known as expert-algorithm-collaboration, have recently become popular. However, potential biases introduced by this operation mode and their effects for training neuronal networks are not entirely understood. This work aims to shed light on some of the effects by providing a case study for three pathologically relevant diagnostic settings. Ten trained pathology experts performed a labeling tasks first without and later with computer-generated augmentation. To investigate different biasing effects, we intentionally introduced errors to the augmentation. Furthermore, we developed a novel loss function which incorporates the experts' annotation consensus in the training of a deep learning classifier. In total, the pathology experts annotated 26,015 cells on 1,200 images in this novel annotation study. Backed by this extensive data set, we found that the consensus of multiple experts and the deep learning classifier accuracy, was significantly increased in the computer-aided setting, versus the unaided annotation. However, a significant percentage of the deliberately introduced false labels was not identified by the experts. Additionally, we showed that our loss function profited from multiple experts and outperformed conventional loss functions. At the same time, systematic errors did not lead to a deterioration of the trained classifier accuracy. Furthermore, a classifier trained with annotations from a single expert with computer-aided support can outperform the combined annotations from up to nine experts.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Pulmonary Hemosiderophages in Cytology Slides
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Marc Aubreville,
Christof A. Bertram,
Jason Stayt,
Anne-Katherine Jasensky,
Florian Bartenschlager,
Marco Fragoso-Garcia,
Ann K. Barton,
Svenja Elsemann,
Samir Jabari,
Jens Krauth,
Prathmesh Madhu,
Jörn Voigt,
Jenny Hill,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Purpose: Exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH) is a common syndrome in sport horses with negative impact on performance. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by use of a scoring system is considered the most sensitive diagnostic method. Macrophages are classified depending on the degree of cytoplasmic hemosiderin content. The current gold standard is manual grading, which is however mon…
▽ More
Purpose: Exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH) is a common syndrome in sport horses with negative impact on performance. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by use of a scoring system is considered the most sensitive diagnostic method. Macrophages are classified depending on the degree of cytoplasmic hemosiderin content. The current gold standard is manual grading, which is however monotonous and time-consuming. Methods: We evaluated state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods for single cell macrophage classification and compared them against the performance of nine cytology experts and evaluated inter- and intra-observer variability. Additionally, we evaluated object detection methods on a novel data set of 17 completely annotated cytology whole slide images (WSI) containing 78,047 hemosiderophages. Resultsf: Our deep learning-based approach reached a concordance of 0.85, partially exceeding human expert concordance (0.68 to 0.86, $μ$=0.73, $σ$ =0.04). Intra-observer variability was high (0.68 to 0.88) and inter-observer concordance was moderate (Fleiss kappa = 0.67). Our object detection approach has a mean average precision of 0.66 over the five classes from the whole slide gigapixel image and a computation time of below two minutes. Conclusion: To mitigate the high inter- and intra-rater variability, we propose our automated object detection pipeline, enabling accurate, reproducible and quick EIPH scoring in WSI.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.