-
Raw High-Definition Radar for Multi-Task Learning
Authors:
Julien Rebut,
Arthur Ouaknine,
Waqas Malik,
Patrick Pérez
Abstract:
With their robustness to adverse weather conditions and ability to measure speeds, radar sensors have been part of the automotive landscape for more than two decades. Recent progress toward High Definition (HD) Imaging radar has driven the angular resolution below the degree, thus approaching laser scanning performance. However, the amount of data a HD radar delivers and the computational cost to…
▽ More
With their robustness to adverse weather conditions and ability to measure speeds, radar sensors have been part of the automotive landscape for more than two decades. Recent progress toward High Definition (HD) Imaging radar has driven the angular resolution below the degree, thus approaching laser scanning performance. However, the amount of data a HD radar delivers and the computational cost to estimate the angular positions remain a challenge. In this paper, we propose a novel HD radar sensing model, FFT-RadNet, that eliminates the overhead of computing the range-azimuth-Doppler 3D tensor, learning instead to recover angles from a range-Doppler spectrum. FFT-RadNet is trained both to detect vehicles and to segment free driving space. On both tasks, it competes with the most recent radar-based models while requiring less compute and memory. Also, we collected and annotated 2-hour worth of raw data from synchronized automotive-grade sensors (camera, laser, HD radar) in various environments (city street, highway, countryside road). This unique dataset, nick-named RADIal for "Radar, Lidar et al.", is available at https://github.com/valeoai/RADIal.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2022; v1 submitted 20 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Deep Open Space Segmentation using Automotive Radar
Authors:
Farzan Erlik Nowruzi,
Dhanvin Kolhatkar,
Prince Kapoor,
Fahed Al Hassanat,
Elnaz Jahani Heravi,
Robert Laganiere,
Julien Rebut,
Waqas Malik
Abstract:
In this work, we propose the use of radar with advanced deep segmentation models to identify open space in parking scenarios. A publically available dataset of radar observations called SCORP was collected. Deep models are evaluated with various radar input representations. Our proposed approach achieves low memory usage and real-time processing speeds, and is thus very well suited for embedded de…
▽ More
In this work, we propose the use of radar with advanced deep segmentation models to identify open space in parking scenarios. A publically available dataset of radar observations called SCORP was collected. Deep models are evaluated with various radar input representations. Our proposed approach achieves low memory usage and real-time processing speeds, and is thus very well suited for embedded deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Optimal Sensor Placement for Intruder Detection
Authors:
Waseem A. Malik,
Nuno C. Martins,
Ananthram Swami
Abstract:
We consider the centralized detection of an intruder, whose location is modeled as uniform across a specified set of points, using an optimally placed team of sensors. These sensors make conditionally independent observations. The local detectors at the sensors are also assumed to be identical, with detection probability $(P_{_{D}})$ and false alarm probability $(P_{_{F}})$. We formulate the probl…
▽ More
We consider the centralized detection of an intruder, whose location is modeled as uniform across a specified set of points, using an optimally placed team of sensors. These sensors make conditionally independent observations. The local detectors at the sensors are also assumed to be identical, with detection probability $(P_{_{D}})$ and false alarm probability $(P_{_{F}})$. We formulate the problem as an N-ary hypothesis testing problem, jointly optimizing the sensor placement and detection policies at the fusion center. We prove that uniform sensor placement is never strictly optimal when the number of sensors $(M)$ equals the number of placement points $(N)$. We prove that for $N_{2} > N_{1} > M$, where $N_{1},N_{2}$ are number of placement points, the framework utilizing $M$ sensors and $N_{1}$ placement points has the same optimal placement structure as the one utilizing $M$ sensors and $N_{2}$ placement points. For $M\leq 5$ and for fixed $P_{_{D}}$, increasing $P_{_{F}}$ leads to optimal placements that are higher in the majorization-based placement scale. Similarly for $M\leq 5$ and for fixed $P_{_{F}}$, increasing $P_{_{D}}$ leads to optimal placements that are higher in the majorization-based placement scale. For $M>5$, this result does not necessarily hold and we provide a simple counterexample. It is conjectured that the set of optimal placements for a given $(M,N)$ can always be placed on a majorization-based placement scale.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2011;
originally announced September 2011.
