-
Joint multi-field T$_1$ quantification for fast field-cycling MRI
Authors:
Markus Bödenler,
Oliver Maier,
Rudolf Stollberger,
Lionel M. Broche,
P. James Ross,
Mary-Joan MacLeod,
Hermann Scharfetter
Abstract:
Purpose: Recent developments in hardware design enable the use of Fast Field-Cycling (FFC) techniques in MRI to exploit the different relaxation rates at very low field strength, achieving novel contrast. The method opens new avenues for in vivo characterisations of pathologies but at the expense of longer acquisition times. To mitigate this we propose a model-based reconstruction method that full…
▽ More
Purpose: Recent developments in hardware design enable the use of Fast Field-Cycling (FFC) techniques in MRI to exploit the different relaxation rates at very low field strength, achieving novel contrast. The method opens new avenues for in vivo characterisations of pathologies but at the expense of longer acquisition times. To mitigate this we propose a model-based reconstruction method that fully exploits the high information redundancy offered by FFC methods. Methods: The proposed model-based approach utilizes joint spatial information from all fields by means of a Frobenius - total generalized variation regularization. The algorithm was tested on brain stroke images, both simulated and acquired from FFC patients scans using an FFC spin echo sequences. The results are compared to three non-linear least squares fits with progressively increasing complexity. Results: The proposed method shows excellent abilities to remove noise while maintaining sharp image features with large signal-to-noise ratio gains at low-field images, clearly outperforming the reference approach. Especially patient data shows huge improvements in visual appearance over all fields. Conclusion: The proposed reconstruction technique largely improves FFC image quality, further pushing this new technology towards clinical standards.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2021; v1 submitted 19 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Non-linear fitting with joint spatial regularization in Arterial Spin Labeling
Authors:
Oliver Maier,
Stefan M Spann,
Daniela Pinter,
Thomas Gattringer,
Nicole Hinteregger,
Gerhard G. Thallinger,
Christian Enzinger,
Josef Pfeuffer,
Kristian Bredies,
Rudolf Stollberger
Abstract:
Multi-Delay single-shot arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging provides accurate cerebral blood flow (CBF) and, in addition, arterial transit time (ATT) maps but the inherent low SNR can be challenging. Especially standard fitting using non-linear least squares often fails in regions with poor SNR, resulting in noisy estimates of the quantitative maps. State-of-the-art fitting techniques improve the…
▽ More
Multi-Delay single-shot arterial spin labeling (ASL) imaging provides accurate cerebral blood flow (CBF) and, in addition, arterial transit time (ATT) maps but the inherent low SNR can be challenging. Especially standard fitting using non-linear least squares often fails in regions with poor SNR, resulting in noisy estimates of the quantitative maps. State-of-the-art fitting techniques improve the SNR by incorporating prior knowledge in the estimation process which typically leads to spatial blurring. To this end, we propose a new estimation method with a joint spatial total generalized variation regularization on CBF and ATT. This joint regularization approach utilizes shared spatial features across maps to enhance sharpness and simultaneously improves noise suppression in the final estimates. The proposed method is evaluated at three levels, first on synthetic phantom data including pathologies, followed by in vivo acquisitions of healthy volunteers, and finally on patient data following an ischemic stroke. The quantitative estimates are compared to two reference methods, non-linear least squares fitting and a state-of-the-art ASL quantification algorithm based on Bayesian inference. The proposed joint regularization approach outperforms the reference implementations, substantially increasing the SNR in CBF and ATT while maintaining sharpness and quantitative accuracy in the estimates.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2021; v1 submitted 10 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
CG-SENSE revisited: Results from the first ISMRM reproducibility challenge
Authors:
Oliver Maier,
Steven H. Baete,
Alexander Fyrdahl,
Kerstin Hammernik,
Seb Harrevelt,
Lars Kasper,
Agah Karakuzu,
Michael Loecher,
Franz Patzig,
Ye Tian,
Ke Wang,
Daniel Gallichan,
Martin Uecker,
Florian Knoll
Abstract:
Purpose: The aim of this work is to shed light on the issue of reproducibility in MR image reconstruction in the context of a challenge. Participants had to recreate the results of "Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories" by Pruessmann et al.
Methods: The task of the challenge was to reconstruct radially acquired multi-coil k-space data (brain/heart) following the m…
▽ More
Purpose: The aim of this work is to shed light on the issue of reproducibility in MR image reconstruction in the context of a challenge. Participants had to recreate the results of "Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories" by Pruessmann et al.
Methods: The task of the challenge was to reconstruct radially acquired multi-coil k-space data (brain/heart) following the method in the original paper, reproducing its key figures. Results were compared to consolidated reference implementations created after the challenge, accounting for the two most common programming languages used in the submissions (Matlab/Python).
Results: Visually, differences between submissions were small. Pixel-wise differences originated from image orientation, assumed field-of-view or resolution. The reference implementations were in good agreement, both visually and in terms of image similarity metrics.
Discussion and Conclusion: While the description level of the published algorithm enabled participants to reproduce CG-SENSE in general, details of the implementation varied, e.g., density compensation or Tikhonov regularization. Implicit assumptions about the data lead to further differences, emphasizing the importance of sufficient meta-data accompanying open data sets. Defining reproducibility quantitatively turned out to be non-trivial for this image reconstruction challenge, in the absence of ground-truth results. Typical similarity measures like NMSE of SSIM were misled by image intensity scaling and outlier pixels. Thus, to facilitate reproducibility, researchers are encouraged to publish code and data alongside the original paper. Future methodological papers on MR image reconstruction might benefit from the consolidated reference implementations of CG-SENSE presented here, as a benchmark for methods comparison.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
