-
Real-World Implementation of Reinforcement Learning Based Energy Coordination for a Cluster of Households
Authors:
Gargya Gokhale,
Niels Tiben,
Marie-Sophie Verwee,
Manu Lahariya,
Bert Claessens,
Chris Develder
Abstract:
Given its substantial contribution of 40\% to global power consumption, the built environment has received increasing attention to serve as a source of flexibility to assist the modern power grid. In that respect, previous research mainly focused on energy management of individual buildings. In contrast, in this paper, we focus on aggregated control of a set of residential buildings, to provide gr…
▽ More
Given its substantial contribution of 40\% to global power consumption, the built environment has received increasing attention to serve as a source of flexibility to assist the modern power grid. In that respect, previous research mainly focused on energy management of individual buildings. In contrast, in this paper, we focus on aggregated control of a set of residential buildings, to provide grid supporting services, that eventually should include ancillary services. In particular, we present a real-life pilot study that studies the effectiveness of reinforcement-learning (RL) in coordinating the power consumption of 8 residential buildings to jointly track a target power signal. Our RL approach relies solely on observed data from individual households and does not require any explicit building models or simulators, making it practical to implement and easy to scale. We show the feasibility of our proposed RL-based coordination strategy in a real-world setting. In a 4-week case study, we demonstrate a hierarchical control system, relying on an RL-based ranking system to select which households to activate flex assets from, and a real-time PI control-based power dispatch mechanism to control the selected assets. Our results demonstrate satisfactory power tracking, and the effectiveness of the RL-based ranks which are learnt in a purely data-driven manner.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Physics Informed LSTM Network for Flexibility Identification in Evaporative Cooling Systems
Authors:
Manu Lahariya,
Farzaneh Karami,
Chris Develder,
Guillaume Crevecoeur
Abstract:
In energy intensive industrial systems, an evaporative cooling process may introduce operational flexibility. Such flexibility refers to a systems ability to deviate from its scheduled energy consumption. Identifying the flexibility, and therefore, designing control that ensures efficient and reliable operation presents a great challenge due to the inherently complex dynamics of industrial systems…
▽ More
In energy intensive industrial systems, an evaporative cooling process may introduce operational flexibility. Such flexibility refers to a systems ability to deviate from its scheduled energy consumption. Identifying the flexibility, and therefore, designing control that ensures efficient and reliable operation presents a great challenge due to the inherently complex dynamics of industrial systems. Recently, machine learning models have attracted attention for identifying flexibility, due to their ability to model complex nonlinear behavior. This research presents machine learning based methods that integrate system dynamics into the machine learning models (e.g., Neural Networks) for better adherence to physical constraints. We define and evaluate physics informed long-short term memory networks (PhyLSTM) and physics informed neural networks (PhyNN) for the identification of flexibility in the evaporative cooling process. These physics informed networks approximate the time-dependent relationship between control input and system response while enforcing the dynamics of the process in the neural network architecture. Our proposed PhyLSTM provides less than 2% system response estimation error, converges in less than half iterations compared to a baseline Neural Network (NN), and accurately estimates the defined flexibility metrics. We include a detailed analysis of the impact of training data size on the performance and optimization of our proposed models.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Computationally efficient joint coordination of multiple electric vehicle charging points using reinforcement learning
Authors:
Manu Lahariya,
Nasrin Sadeghianpourhamami,
Chris Develder
Abstract:
A major challenge in todays power grid is to manage the increasing load from electric vehicle (EV) charging. Demand response (DR) solutions aim to exploit flexibility therein, i.e., the ability to shift EV charging in time and thus avoid excessive peaks or achieve better balancing. Whereas the majority of existing research works either focus on control strategies for a single EV charger, or use a…
▽ More
A major challenge in todays power grid is to manage the increasing load from electric vehicle (EV) charging. Demand response (DR) solutions aim to exploit flexibility therein, i.e., the ability to shift EV charging in time and thus avoid excessive peaks or achieve better balancing. Whereas the majority of existing research works either focus on control strategies for a single EV charger, or use a multi-step approach (e.g., a first high level aggregate control decision step, followed by individual EV control decisions), we rather propose a single-step solution that jointly coordinates multiple charging points at once. In this paper, we further refine an initial proposal using reinforcement learning (RL), specifically addressing computational challenges that would limit its deployment in practice. More precisely, we design a new Markov decision process (MDP) formulation of the EV charging coordination process, exhibiting only linear space and time complexity (as opposed to the earlier quadratic space complexity). We thus improve upon earlier state-of-the-art, demonstrating 30% reduction of training time in our case study using real-world EV charging session data. Yet, we do not sacrifice the resulting performance in meeting the DR objectives: our new RL solutions still improve the performance of charging demand coordination by 40-50% compared to a business-as-usual policy (that charges EV fully upon arrival) and 20-30% compared to a heuristic policy (that uniformly spreads individual EV charging over time).
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
