-
Mode Selection in Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
Samuel R. Shebert,
Anthony F. Martone,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
Cognitive Radar Networks, which were popularized by Simon Haykin in 2006, have been proposed to address limitations with legacy radar installations. These limitations include large physical size, power consumption, fixed operating parameters, and single point vulnerabilities. Cognitive radar solves part of this problem through adaptability, using biologically inspired techniques to observe the env…
▽ More
Cognitive Radar Networks, which were popularized by Simon Haykin in 2006, have been proposed to address limitations with legacy radar installations. These limitations include large physical size, power consumption, fixed operating parameters, and single point vulnerabilities. Cognitive radar solves part of this problem through adaptability, using biologically inspired techniques to observe the environment and adjust operation accordingly. Cognitive radar networks (CRNs) extend the capabilities of cognitive radar spatially, providing the opportunity to observe targets from multiple angles to mitigate stealth effects; distribute resources over space and in time; obtain better tracking performance; and gain more information from a scene. Often, problems of cognition in CRNs are viewed through the lens of iterative learning problems - one or multiple cognitive processes are implemented in the network, where each process first observes the environment, then selects operating parameters (from discrete or continuous options) using the history of observations and previous rewards, then repeats the cycle. Further, cognitive radar networks often are modeled with a flexible architecture and wide-bandwidth front-ends, enabling the addition of electronic support measures such as passive signal estimation. In this work we consider questions of the form "How should a cognitive radar network choose when to observe targets?" and "How can a cognitive radar network reduce the amount of energy it uses?". We implement tools from the multi-armed bandit and age of information literature to select modes for the network, choosing either an active radar mode or a passive signal estimation mode. We show that through the use of target classes, the network can determine how often each target should be observed to optimize tracking performance.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 30 November, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Mode Selection and Target Classification in Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
Samuel R. Shebert,
Benjamin H. Kirk,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
Cognitive Radar Networks were proposed by Simon Haykin in 2006 to address problems with large legacy radar implementations - primarily, single-point vulnerabilities and lack of adaptability. This work proposes to leverage the adaptability of cognitive radar networks to trade between active radar observation, which uses high power and risks interception, and passive signal parameter estimation, whi…
▽ More
Cognitive Radar Networks were proposed by Simon Haykin in 2006 to address problems with large legacy radar implementations - primarily, single-point vulnerabilities and lack of adaptability. This work proposes to leverage the adaptability of cognitive radar networks to trade between active radar observation, which uses high power and risks interception, and passive signal parameter estimation, which uses target emissions to gain side information and lower the power necessary to accurately track multiple targets. The goal of the network is to learn over many target tracks both the characteristics of the targets as well as the optimal action choices for each type of target. In order to select between the available actions, we utilize a multi-armed bandit model, using current class information as prior information. When the active radar action is selected, the node estimates the physical behavior of targets through the radar emissions. When the passive action is selected, the node estimates the radio behavior of targets through passive sensing. Over many target tracks, the network collects the observed behavior of targets and forms clusters of similarly-behaved targets. In this way, the network meta-learns the target class distributions while learning the optimal mode selections for each target class.
△ Less
Submitted 25 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Open and Closed-Loop Weight Selection for Pattern Control of Paraboloidal Reflector Antennas with Reconfigurable Rim Scattering
Authors:
R. Michael Buehrer,
William W. Howard,
Steven Ellingson
Abstract:
It has been demonstrated that modifying the rim scattering of a paraboloidal reflector antenna through the use of reconfigurable elements along the rim facilitates sidelobe modification including cancelling sidelobes. In this work we investigate several open questions with respect to algorithms for determining the weights. First, we derive the general weight values needed at each reconfigurable el…
▽ More
It has been demonstrated that modifying the rim scattering of a paraboloidal reflector antenna through the use of reconfigurable elements along the rim facilitates sidelobe modification including cancelling sidelobes. In this work we investigate several open questions with respect to algorithms for determining the weights. First, we derive the general weight values needed at each reconfigurable element to place nulls at arbitrary angles. Second, since in many cases these weights require gains other than one, we develop a technique for determining unit-modulus weights so as to allow for surfaces which merely modify the phase of the scattered field, while substantially reducing the gain at arbitrary angles. Specifically, it is shown that despite the large search space (and non-convexity in the presence of discrete weights), weights can be found with reasonable computational complexity which provide useful cancellation capability. Third, it is demonstrated that this can be done using open-loop (i.e., with pattern knowledge), closed-loop (without pattern knowledge), or hybrid (with inexact pattern knowledge) techniques both quantized and unquantized phases. A primary finding is that sufficiently deep nulls are possible with essentially no change in the main lobe gain with practical (binary or quaternary) phase-only weights.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2024; v1 submitted 30 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Timely Target Tracking: Distributed Updating in Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
Anthony F. Martone,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
Cognitive radar networks (CRNs) are capable of optimizing operating parameters in order to provide actionable information to an operator or secondary system. CRNs have been proposed to answer the need for low-cost devices tracking potentially large numbers of targets in geographically diverse regions. Networks of small-scale devices have also been shown to outperform legacy, large scale, high pric…
▽ More
Cognitive radar networks (CRNs) are capable of optimizing operating parameters in order to provide actionable information to an operator or secondary system. CRNs have been proposed to answer the need for low-cost devices tracking potentially large numbers of targets in geographically diverse regions. Networks of small-scale devices have also been shown to outperform legacy, large scale, high price, single-device installations. In this work, we consider a CRN tracking multiple targets with a goal of providing information which is both fresh and accurate to a measurement fusion center (FC). We show that under a constraint on the update rate of each radar node, the network is able to utilize Age of Information (AoI) metrics to maximize the resource utilization and minimize error per track. Since information freshness is critical to decision-making, this structure enables a CRN to provide the highest-quality information possible to a downstream system or operator. We discuss centralized and distributed approaches to solving this problem, taking into account the quality of node observations, the maneuverability of each target, and a limit on the rate at which any node may provide updates to the FC. We present a centralized AoI-inspired node selection metric, where a FC requests updates from specific nodes. We compare this against several alternative techniques. Further, we provide a distributed approach which utilizes the Age of Incorrect Information (AoII) metric, allowing each independent node to provide updates according to the targets it can observe. We provide mathematical analysis of the rate limits defined for the centralized and distributed approaches, showing that they are equivalent. We conclude with numerical simulations demonstrating that the performance of the algorithms exceeds that of alternative approaches, both in resource utilization and in tracking performance.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2024; v1 submitted 24 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Hybrid Cognition for Target Tracking in Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
This work investigates online learning techniques for a cognitive radar network utilizing feedback from a central coordinator. The available spectrum is divided into channels, and each radar node must transmit in one channel per time step. The network attempts to optimize radar tracking accuracy by learning the optimal channel selection for spectrum sharing and radar performance. We define optimal…
▽ More
This work investigates online learning techniques for a cognitive radar network utilizing feedback from a central coordinator. The available spectrum is divided into channels, and each radar node must transmit in one channel per time step. The network attempts to optimize radar tracking accuracy by learning the optimal channel selection for spectrum sharing and radar performance. We define optimal selection for such a network in relation to the radar observation quality obtainable in a given channel. This is a difficult problem since the network must seek the optimal assignment from nodes to channels, rather than just seek the best overall channel. Since the presence of primary users appears as interference, the approach also improves spectrum sharing performance. In other words, maximizing radar performance also minimizes interference to primary users. Each node is able to learn the quality of several available channels through repeated sensing. We define hybrid cognition as the condition where both the independent radar nodes as well as the central coordinator are modeled as cognitive agents, with restrictions on the amount of information that can be exchanged between the radars and the coordinator. Importantly, each part of the network acts as an online learner, observing the environment to inform future actions. We show that in interference-limited spectrum, where the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio varies by channel and over time for a target with fixed radar cross section, a cognitive radar network is able to use information from the central coordinator in order to reduce the amount of time necessary to learn the optimal channel selection. We also show that even limited use of a central coordinator can eliminate collisions, which occur when two nodes select the same channel.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2023; v1 submitted 28 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Online Learning-based Waveform Selection for Improved Vehicle Recognition in Automotive Radar
Authors:
Charles E. Thornton,
William W. Howard,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
This paper describes important considerations and challenges associated with online reinforcement-learning based waveform selection for target identification in frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) automotive radar systems. We present a novel learning approach based on satisficing Thompson sampling, which quickly identifies a waveform expected to yield satisfactory classification performance…
▽ More
This paper describes important considerations and challenges associated with online reinforcement-learning based waveform selection for target identification in frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) automotive radar systems. We present a novel learning approach based on satisficing Thompson sampling, which quickly identifies a waveform expected to yield satisfactory classification performance. We demonstrate through measurement-level simulations that effective waveform selection strategies can be quickly learned, even in cases where the radar must select from a large catalog of candidate waveforms. The radar learns to adaptively select a bandwidth for appropriate resolution and a slow-time unimodular code for interference mitigation in the scene of interest by optimizing an expected classification metric.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Timely Target Tracking in Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
Charles E. Thornton,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
We consider a scenario where a fusion center must decide which updates to receive during each update period in a communication-limited cognitive radar network. When each radar node in the network only is able to obtain noisy state measurements for a subset of the targets, the fusion center may not receive updates on every target during each update period. The solution for the selection problem at…
▽ More
We consider a scenario where a fusion center must decide which updates to receive during each update period in a communication-limited cognitive radar network. When each radar node in the network only is able to obtain noisy state measurements for a subset of the targets, the fusion center may not receive updates on every target during each update period. The solution for the selection problem at the fusion center is not well suited for sequential learning frameworks. We derive an Age of Information-inspired track sensitive metric to inform node selection in such a network and compare it against less-informed techniques.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2023; v1 submitted 21 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Model Order Estimation in the Presence of multipath Interference using Residual Convolutional Neural Networks
Authors:
Jianyuan Yu,
William W. Howard,
Yue Xu,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
Model order estimation (MOE) is often a pre-requisite for Direction of Arrival (DoA) estimation. Due to limits imposed by array geometry, it is typically not possible to estimate spatial parameters for an arbitrary number of sources; an estimate of the signal model is usually required. MOE is the process of selecting the most likely signal model from several candidates. While classic methods fail…
▽ More
Model order estimation (MOE) is often a pre-requisite for Direction of Arrival (DoA) estimation. Due to limits imposed by array geometry, it is typically not possible to estimate spatial parameters for an arbitrary number of sources; an estimate of the signal model is usually required. MOE is the process of selecting the most likely signal model from several candidates. While classic methods fail at MOE in the presence of coherent multipath interference, data-driven supervised learning models can solve this problem. Instead of the classic MLP (Multiple Layer Perceptions) or CNN (Convolutional Neural Networks) architectures, we propose the application of Residual Convolutional Neural Networks (RCNN), with grouped symmetric kernel filters to deliver state-of-art estimation accuracy of up to 95.2\% in the presence of coherent multipath, and a weighted loss function to eliminate underestimation error of the model order. We show the benefit of the approach by demonstrating its impact on an overall signal processing flow that determines the number of total signals received by the array, the number of independent sources, and the association of each of the paths with those sources . Moreover, we show that the proposed estimator provides accurate performance over a variety of array types, can identify the overloaded scenario, and ultimately provides strong DoA estimation and signal association performance.
△ Less
Submitted 1 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Adversarial Multi-Player Bandits for Cognitive Radar Networks
Authors:
William W. Howard,
R. M. Buehrer,
Anthony Martone
Abstract:
We model a radar network as an adversarial bandit problem, where the environment pre-selects reward sequences for each of several actions available to the network. This excludes environments which vary rewards in response to the learner's actions. Adversarial environments include those with third party emitters which enter and exit the environment according to some criteria which does not depend o…
▽ More
We model a radar network as an adversarial bandit problem, where the environment pre-selects reward sequences for each of several actions available to the network. This excludes environments which vary rewards in response to the learner's actions. Adversarial environments include those with third party emitters which enter and exit the environment according to some criteria which does not depend on the radar network. The network consists of several independent radar nodes, which attempt to attain the highest possible SINR in each of many time steps. We show that in such an environment, simple sub-band selection algorithms are unable to consistently attain high SINR. However, through the use of adversarial multi-player bandit algorithms, a radar network can continue to track targets without a loss in tracking precision.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Multi-Target Localization Using Polarization Sensitive Arrays
Authors:
William W. Howard,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
In this work we develop clustering techniques for the Bearing Only Target Localization (BOTL) problem. Our scenario has a receiver move along some path, generating bearing estimates on some interval. Multiple emitting targets exist in the environment, and may be physically close with respect to the receiver distance. The first method is iterative and uses only a series of observed bearings to mult…
▽ More
In this work we develop clustering techniques for the Bearing Only Target Localization (BOTL) problem. Our scenario has a receiver move along some path, generating bearing estimates on some interval. Multiple emitting targets exist in the environment, and may be physically close with respect to the receiver distance. The first method is iterative and uses only a series of observed bearings to multiple targets to establish clusters. In each iteration, target positions are estimated using a nonlinear least squares solution. The second technique uses additional polarization information, and is shown to be more effective while requiring more information. In addition the second technique is non-iterative and requires far less computation. In this work we presume knowledge of the number of targets. We conclude by providing simulations of our method and show that the proposed approach outperforms previously proposed methods.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2021; v1 submitted 18 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Direction of Arrival Estimation for a Vector Sensor Using Deep Neural Networks
Authors:
Jianyuan Yu,
William W. Howard,
Daniel Tait,
R. Michael Buehrer
Abstract:
A vector sensor, a type of sensor array with six collocated antennas to measure all electromagnetic field components of incident waves, has been shown to be advantageous in estimating the angle of arrival and polarization of the incident sources. While angle estimation with machine learning for linear arrays has been well studied, there has not been a similar solution for the vector sensor. In thi…
▽ More
A vector sensor, a type of sensor array with six collocated antennas to measure all electromagnetic field components of incident waves, has been shown to be advantageous in estimating the angle of arrival and polarization of the incident sources. While angle estimation with machine learning for linear arrays has been well studied, there has not been a similar solution for the vector sensor. In this paper, we propose neural networks to determine the number of the sources and estimate the angle of arrival of each source, based on the covariance matrix extracted from received data. Also, we provide a solution for matching output angles to corresponding sources and examine the error distributions with this method. The results show that neural networks can achieve reasonably accurate estimation with up to 5 sources, especially if the field-of-view is limited.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
