Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Ben-Moshe, N

RawECGNet: Deep Learning Generalization for Atrial Fibrillation Detection from the Raw ECG

Authors: Noam Ben-Moshe, Kenta Tsutsui, Shany Biton, Leif Sörnmo, Joachim A. Behar

Abstract: Introduction: Deep learning models for detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) using rhythm information in long-term, ambulatory ECG recordings have shown high performance. However, the rhythm-based approach does not take advantage of the morphological information conveyed by the different ECG waveforms, particularly the f-waves. As a result, the performance of such models may be inherently… ▽ More Introduction: Deep learning models for detecting episodes of atrial fibrillation (AF) using rhythm information in long-term, ambulatory ECG recordings have shown high performance. However, the rhythm-based approach does not take advantage of the morphological information conveyed by the different ECG waveforms, particularly the f-waves. As a result, the performance of such models may be inherently limited. Methods: To address this limitation, we have developed a deep learning model, named RawECGNet, to detect episodes of AF and atrial flutter (AFl) using the raw, single-lead ECG. We compare the generalization performance of RawECGNet on two external data sets that account for distribution shifts in geography, ethnicity, and lead position. RawECGNet is further benchmarked against a state-of-the-art deep learning model, named ArNet2, which utilizes rhythm information as input. Results: Using RawECGNet, the results for the different leads in the external test sets in terms of the F1 score were 0.91--0.94 in RBDB and 0.93 in SHDB, compared to 0.89--0.91 in RBDB and 0.91 in SHDB for ArNet2. The results highlight RawECGNet as a high-performance, generalizable algorithm for detection of AF and AFl episodes, exploiting information on both rhythm and morphology. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2023; originally announced January 2024.

Machine Learning for Ranking f-wave Extraction Methods in Single-Lead ECGs

Authors: Noam Ben-Moshe, Shany Biton, Kenta Tsutsui, Mahmoud Suleiman, Leif Sörnmo, Joachim A. Behar

Abstract: Introduction: The presence of fibrillatory waves (f-waves) is important in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), which has motivated the development of methods for f-wave extraction. We propose a novel approach to benchmarking methods designed for single-lead ECG analysis, building on the hypothesis that better-performing AF classification using features computed from the extracted f-waves im… ▽ More Introduction: The presence of fibrillatory waves (f-waves) is important in the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF), which has motivated the development of methods for f-wave extraction. We propose a novel approach to benchmarking methods designed for single-lead ECG analysis, building on the hypothesis that better-performing AF classification using features computed from the extracted f-waves implies better-performing extraction. The approach is well-suited for processing large Holter data sets annotated with respect to the presence of AF. Methods: Three data sets with a total of 300 two- or three-lead Holter recordings, performed in the USA, Israel and Japan, were used as well as a simulated single-lead data set. Four existing extraction methods based on either average beat subtraction or principal component analysis (PCA) were evaluated. A random forest classifier was used for window-based AF classification. Performance was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Results: The best performance was found for PCA-based extraction, resulting in AUROCs in the ranges 0.77--0.83, 0.62--0.78, and 0.87--0.89 for the data sets from USA, Israel, and Japan, respectively, when analyzed across leads; the AUROC of the simulated single-lead, noisy data set was 0.98. Conclusions: This study provides a novel approach to evaluating the performance of f-wave extraction methods, offering the advantage of not using ground truth f-waves for evaluation, thus being able to leverage real data sets for evaluation. The code is open source (following publication). △ Less

Submitted 17 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

ArNet-ECG: Deep Learning for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation from the Raw Electrocardiogram

Authors: Noam Ben-Moshe, Shany Biton, Joachim A. Behar

Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent heart arrhythmia. AF manifests on the electrocardiogram (ECG) though irregular beat-to-beat time interval variation, the absence of P-wave and the presence of fibrillatory waves (f-wave). We hypothesize that a deep learning (DL) approach trained on the raw ECG will enable robust detection of AF events and the estimation of the AF burden (AFB). We furt… ▽ More Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent heart arrhythmia. AF manifests on the electrocardiogram (ECG) though irregular beat-to-beat time interval variation, the absence of P-wave and the presence of fibrillatory waves (f-wave). We hypothesize that a deep learning (DL) approach trained on the raw ECG will enable robust detection of AF events and the estimation of the AF burden (AFB). We further hypothesize that the performance reached leveraging the raw ECG will be superior to previously developed methods using the beat-to-beat interval variation time series. Consequently, we develop a new DL algorithm, denoted ArNet-ECG, to robustly detect AF events and estimate the AFB from the raw ECG and benchmark this algorithms against previous work. Methods: A dataset including 2,247 adult patients and totaling over 53,753 hours of continuous ECG from the University of Virginia (UVAF) was used. Results: ArNet-ECG obtained an F1 of 0.96 and ArNet2 obtained an F1 0.94. Discussion and conclusion: ArNet-ECG outperformed ArNet2 thus demonstrating that using the raw ECG provides added performance over the beat-to-beat interval time series. The main reason found for explaining the higher performance of ArNet-ECG was its high performance on atrial flutter examples versus poor performance on these recordings for ArNet2. △ Less

Submitted 22 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.