-
Source Separation of Small Classical Ensembles: Challenges and Opportunities
Authors:
Gerardo Roa-Dabike,
Trevor J. Cox,
Jon P. Barker,
Michael A. Akeroyd,
Scott Bannister,
Bruno Fazenda,
Jennifer Firth,
Simone Graetzer,
Alinka Greasley,
Rebecca R. Vos,
William M. Whitmer
Abstract:
Musical (MSS) source separation of western popular music using non-causal deep learning can be very effective. In contrast, MSS for classical music is an unsolved problem. Classical ensembles are harder to separate than popular music because of issues such as the inherent greater variation in the music; the sparsity of recordings with ground truth for supervised training; and greater ambiguity bet…
▽ More
Musical (MSS) source separation of western popular music using non-causal deep learning can be very effective. In contrast, MSS for classical music is an unsolved problem. Classical ensembles are harder to separate than popular music because of issues such as the inherent greater variation in the music; the sparsity of recordings with ground truth for supervised training; and greater ambiguity between instruments. The Cadenza project has been exploring MSS for classical music. This is being done so music can be remixed to improve listening experiences for people with hearing loss. To enable the work, a new database of synthesized woodwind ensembles was created to overcome instrumental imbalances in the EnsembleSet. For the MSS, a set of ConvTasNet models was used with each model being trained to extract a string or woodwind instrument. ConvTasNet was chosen because it enabled both causal and non-causal approaches to be tested. Non-causal approaches have dominated MSS work and are useful for recorded music, but for live music or processing on hearing aids, causal signal processing is needed. The MSS performance was evaluated on the two small datasets (Bach10 and URMP) of real instrument recordings where the ground-truth is available. The performances of the causal and non-causal systems were similar. Comparing the average Signal-to-Distortion (SDR) of the synthesized validation set (6.2 dB causal; 6.9 non-causal), to the real recorded evaluation set (0.3 dB causal, 0.4 dB non-causal), shows that mismatch between synthesized and recorded data is a problem. Future work needs to either gather more real recordings that can be used for training, or to improve the realism and diversity of the synthesized recordings to reduce the mismatch...
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
The first Cadenza challenges: using machine learning competitions to improve music for listeners with a hearing loss
Authors:
Gerardo Roa Dabike,
Michael A. Akeroyd,
Scott Bannister,
Jon P. Barker,
Trevor J. Cox,
Bruno Fazenda,
Jennifer Firth,
Simone Graetzer,
Alinka Greasley,
Rebecca R. Vos,
William M. Whitmer
Abstract:
It is well established that listening to music is an issue for those with hearing loss, and hearing aids are not a universal solution. How can machine learning be used to address this? This paper details the first application of the open challenge methodology to use machine learning to improve audio quality of music for those with hearing loss. The first challenge was a stand-alone competition (CA…
▽ More
It is well established that listening to music is an issue for those with hearing loss, and hearing aids are not a universal solution. How can machine learning be used to address this? This paper details the first application of the open challenge methodology to use machine learning to improve audio quality of music for those with hearing loss. The first challenge was a stand-alone competition (CAD1) and had 9 entrants. The second was an 2024 ICASSP grand challenge (ICASSP24) and attracted 17 entrants. The challenge tasks concerned demixing and remixing pop/rock music to allow a personalised rebalancing of the instruments in the mix, along with amplification to correct for raised hearing thresholds. The software baselines provided for entrants to build upon used two state-of-the-art demix algorithms: Hybrid Demucs and Open-Unmix. Evaluation of systems was done using the objective metric HAAQI, the Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index. No entrants improved on the best baseline in CAD1 because there was insufficient room for improvement. Consequently, for ICASSP24 the scenario was made more difficult by using loudspeaker reproduction and specified gains to be applied before remixing. This also made the scenario more useful for listening through hearing aids. 9 entrants scored better than the the best ICASSP24 baseline. Most entrants used a refined version of Hybrid Demucs and NAL-R amplification. The highest scoring system combined the outputs of several demixing algorithms in an ensemble approach. These challenges are now open benchmarks for future research with the software and data being freely available.
△ Less
Submitted 8 September, 2024;
originally announced September 2024.
-
The First Cadenza Signal Processing Challenge: Improving Music for Those With a Hearing Loss
Authors:
Gerardo Roa Dabike,
Scott Bannister,
Jennifer Firth,
Simone Graetzer,
Rebecca Vos,
Michael A. Akeroyd,
Jon Barker,
Trevor J. Cox,
Bruno Fazenda,
Alinka Greasley,
William Whitmer
Abstract:
The Cadenza project aims to improve the audio quality of music for those who have a hearing loss. This is being done through a series of signal processing challenges, to foster better and more inclusive technologies. In the first round, two common listening scenarios are considered: listening to music over headphones, and with a hearing aid in a car. The first scenario is cast as a demixing-remixi…
▽ More
The Cadenza project aims to improve the audio quality of music for those who have a hearing loss. This is being done through a series of signal processing challenges, to foster better and more inclusive technologies. In the first round, two common listening scenarios are considered: listening to music over headphones, and with a hearing aid in a car. The first scenario is cast as a demixing-remixing problem, where the music is decomposed into vocals, bass, drums and other components. These can then be intelligently remixed in a personalized way, to increase the audio quality for a person who has a hearing loss. In the second scenario, music is coming from car loudspeakers, and the music has to be enhanced to overcome the masking effect of the car noise. This is done by taking into account the music, the hearing ability of the listener, the hearing aid and the speed of the car. The audio quality of the submissions will be evaluated using the Hearing Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI) for objective assessment and by a panel of people with hearing loss for subjective evaluation.
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The ICASSP SP Cadenza Challenge: Music Demixing/Remixing for Hearing Aids
Authors:
Gerardo Roa Dabike,
Michael A. Akeroyd,
Scott Bannister,
Jon Barker,
Trevor J. Cox,
Bruno Fazenda,
Jennifer Firth,
Simone Graetzer,
Alinka Greasley,
Rebecca R. Vos,
William M. Whitmer
Abstract:
This paper reports on the design and results of the 2024 ICASSP SP Cadenza Challenge: Music Demixing/Remixing for Hearing Aids. The Cadenza project is working to enhance the audio quality of music for those with a hearing loss. The scenario for the challenge was listening to stereo reproduction over loudspeakers via hearing aids. The task was to: decompose pop/rock music into vocal, drums, bass an…
▽ More
This paper reports on the design and results of the 2024 ICASSP SP Cadenza Challenge: Music Demixing/Remixing for Hearing Aids. The Cadenza project is working to enhance the audio quality of music for those with a hearing loss. The scenario for the challenge was listening to stereo reproduction over loudspeakers via hearing aids. The task was to: decompose pop/rock music into vocal, drums, bass and other (VDBO); rebalance the different tracks with specified gains and then remixing back to stereo. End-to-end approaches were also accepted. 17 systems were submitted by 11 teams. Causal systems performed poorer than non-causal approaches. 9 systems beat the baseline. A common approach was to fine-tuning pretrained demixing models. The best approach used an ensemble of models.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2024; v1 submitted 5 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
