LQG Control Performance with Low Bitrate Periodic Coding
Authors:
Behrooz Amini,
Robert R. Bitmead
Abstract:
Specific low-bitrate coding strategies are examined through their effect on LQ control performance. By limiting the subject to these methods, we are able to identify principles underlying coding for control; a subject of significant recent interest but few tangible results. In particular, we consider coding the quantized output signal deploying period-two codes of differing delay-versus-accuracy t…
▽ More
Specific low-bitrate coding strategies are examined through their effect on LQ control performance. By limiting the subject to these methods, we are able to identify principles underlying coding for control; a subject of significant recent interest but few tangible results. In particular, we consider coding the quantized output signal deploying period-two codes of differing delay-versus-accuracy tradeoff. The quantification of coding performance is via the LQ control cost. The feedback control system comprises the coder-decoder in the path between the output and the state estimator, which is followed by linear state-variable feedback, as is optimal in the memoryless case. The quantizer is treated as the functional composition of an infinitely-long linear staircase function and a saturation. This permits the analysis to subdivide into estimator computations, seemingly independent of the control performance criterion, and an escape time evaluation, which ties the control back into the choice of quantizer saturation bound. An example is studied which illustrates the role of the control objective in determining the efficacy of coding using these schemes. The results mesh well with those observed in signal coding. However, the introduction of a realization-based escape time is a novelty departing significantly from mean square computations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
The Shapeshifter: a Morphing, Multi-Agent,Multi-Modal Robotic Platform for the Exploration of Titan (preprint version)
Authors:
Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi,
Andrea Tagliabue,
Stephanie Schneider,
Benjamin Morrell,
Marco Pavone,
Jason Hofgartner,
Issa A. D. Nesnas,
Rashied B. Amini,
Arash Kalantari,
Alessandra Babuscia,
Jonathan Lunine
Abstract:
In this report for the Nasa NIAC Phase I study, we present a mission architecture and a robotic platform, the Shapeshifter, that allow multi-domain and redundant mobility on Saturn's moon Titan, and potentially other bodies with atmospheres. The Shapeshifter is a collection of simple and affordable robotic units, called Cobots, comparable to personal palm-size quadcopters. By attaching and detachi…
▽ More
In this report for the Nasa NIAC Phase I study, we present a mission architecture and a robotic platform, the Shapeshifter, that allow multi-domain and redundant mobility on Saturn's moon Titan, and potentially other bodies with atmospheres. The Shapeshifter is a collection of simple and affordable robotic units, called Cobots, comparable to personal palm-size quadcopters. By attaching and detaching with each other, multiple Cobots can shape-shift into novel structures, capable of (a) rolling on the surface, to increase the traverse range, (b) flying in a flight array formation, and (c) swimming on or under liquid. A ground station complements the robotic platform, hosting science instrumentation and providing power to recharge the batteries of the Cobots. Our Phase I study had the objective of providing an initial assessment of the feasibility of the proposed robotic platform architecture, and in particular (a) to characterize the expected science return of a mission to the Sotra-Patera region on Titan; (b) to verify the mechanical and algorithmic feasibility of building a multi-agent platform capable of flying, docking, rolling and un-docking; (c) to evaluate the increased range and efficiency of rolling on Titan w.r.t to flying; (d) to define a case-study of a mission for the exploration of the cryovolcano Sotra-Patera on Titan, whose expected variety of geological features challenges conventional mobility platforms.
△ Less
Submitted 16 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.