AI and the Opportunity for Shared Prosperity: Lessons from the History of Technology and the Economy
Authors:
Guy Ben-Ishai,
Jeff Dean,
James Manyika,
Ruth Porat,
Hal Varian,
Kent Walker
Abstract:
Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) marks a pivotal moment in human history. It presents the opportunity for machines to learn, adapt, and perform tasks that have the potential to assist people, from everyday activities to their most creative and ambitious projects. It also has the potential to help businesses and organizations harness knowledge, increase productivity, innovate, transf…
▽ More
Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI) marks a pivotal moment in human history. It presents the opportunity for machines to learn, adapt, and perform tasks that have the potential to assist people, from everyday activities to their most creative and ambitious projects. It also has the potential to help businesses and organizations harness knowledge, increase productivity, innovate, transform, and power shared prosperity. This tremendous potential raises two fundamental questions: (1) Will AI actually advance national and global economic transformation to benefit society at large? and (2) What issues must we get right to fully realize AI's economic value, expand prosperity and improve lives everywhere? We explore these questions by considering the recent history of technology and innovation as a guide for the likely impact of AI and what we must do to realize its economic potential to benefit society. While we do not presume the future will be entirely like that past, for reasons we will discuss, we do believe prior experience with technological change offers many useful lessons. We conclude that while progress in AI presents a historic opportunity to advance our economic prosperity and future wellbeing, its economic benefits will not come automatically and that AI risks exacerbating existing economic challenges unless we collectively and purposefully act to enable its potential and address its challenges. We suggest a collective policy agenda - involving developers, deployers and users of AI, infrastructure providers, policymakers, and those involved in workforce training - that may help both realize and harness AI's economic potential and address its risks to our shared prosperity.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2024; v1 submitted 17 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
Detecting Crop Burning in India using Satellite Data
Authors:
Kendra Walker,
Ben Moscona,
Kelsey Jack,
Seema Jayachandran,
Namrata Kala,
Rohini Pande,
Jiani Xue,
Marshall Burke
Abstract:
Crop residue burning is a major source of air pollution in many parts of the world, notably South Asia. Policymakers, practitioners and researchers have invested in both measuring impacts and developing interventions to reduce burning. However, measuring the impacts of burning or the effectiveness of interventions to reduce burning requires data on where burning occurred. These data are challengin…
▽ More
Crop residue burning is a major source of air pollution in many parts of the world, notably South Asia. Policymakers, practitioners and researchers have invested in both measuring impacts and developing interventions to reduce burning. However, measuring the impacts of burning or the effectiveness of interventions to reduce burning requires data on where burning occurred. These data are challenging to collect in the field, both in terms of cost and feasibility. We take advantage of data from ground-based monitoring of crop residue burning in Punjab, India to explore whether burning can be detected more effectively using accessible satellite imagery. Specifically, we used 3m PlanetScope data with high temporal resolution (up to daily) as well as publicly-available Sentinel-2 data with weekly temporal resolution but greater depth of spectral information. Following an analysis of the ability of different spectral bands and burn indices to separate burned and unburned plots individually, we built a Random Forest model with those determined to provide the greatest separability and evaluated model performance with ground-verified data. Our overall model accuracy of 82-percent is favorable given the challenges presented by the measurement. Based on insights from this process, we discuss technical challenges of detecting crop residue burning from satellite imagery as well as challenges to measuring impacts, both of burning and of policy interventions.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
