Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Uthemann, A

Artificial intelligence and financial crises

Authors: Jon Danielsson, Andreas Uthemann

Abstract: The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) poses new and poorly understood threats to financial stability. We use a game-theoretic model to analyse the stability impact of AI, finding that it amplifies existing financial system vulnerabilities - leverage, liquidity stress and opacity - through superior information processing, common data, speed and strategic complementarities. The conseque… ▽ More The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) poses new and poorly understood threats to financial stability. We use a game-theoretic model to analyse the stability impact of AI, finding that it amplifies existing financial system vulnerabilities - leverage, liquidity stress and opacity - through superior information processing, common data, speed and strategic complementarities. The consequence is crises become faster and more severe, where the likelihood of a crisis is directly affected by how effectively the authorities engage with AI. In response, we propose that the financial authorities develop their own AI systems and expertise, establish direct AI-to-AI communication, implement automated crisis facilities and monitor AI use. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2025; v1 submitted 24 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 26 pages

On the use of artificial intelligence in financial regulations and the impact on financial stability

Authors: Jon Danielsson, Andreas Uthemann

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) can undermine financial stability because of malicious use, misinformation, misalignment, and the AI analytics market structure. The low frequency and uniqueness of financial crises, coupled with mutable and unclear objectives, frustrate machine learning. Even if the authorities prefer a conservative approach to AI adoption, it will likely become widely used by stealth… ▽ More Artificial intelligence (AI) can undermine financial stability because of malicious use, misinformation, misalignment, and the AI analytics market structure. The low frequency and uniqueness of financial crises, coupled with mutable and unclear objectives, frustrate machine learning. Even if the authorities prefer a conservative approach to AI adoption, it will likely become widely used by stealth, taking over increasingly high-level functions driven by significant cost efficiencies and superior performance. We propose six criteria for judging the suitability of AI. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2024; v1 submitted 17 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: 35 pages, 1 table