Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Somerville, J
-
Are Elites Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking? Evidence from MBA Students
Authors:
Marcel Preuss,
Germán Reyes,
Jason Somerville,
Joy Wu
Abstract:
Elites disproportionately influence policymaking, yet little is known about their fairness and efficiency preferences -- key determinants of individuals' support for redistributive policies. We investigate these preferences using an incentivized lab experiment with a group of future elites -- Ivy League MBA students. We find that MBA students implement substantially more unequal earnings distribut…
▽ More
Elites disproportionately influence policymaking, yet little is known about their fairness and efficiency preferences -- key determinants of individuals' support for redistributive policies. We investigate these preferences using an incentivized lab experiment with a group of future elites -- Ivy League MBA students. We find that MBA students implement substantially more unequal earnings distributions than the average American, regardless of whether inequality stems from luck or merit. Their redistributive choices are also highly responsive to efficiency costs, with an elasticity an order of magnitude larger than that found in representative US samples. Analyzing fairness ideals, we find that MBA students are less likely to be strict meritocrats than the general public. These findings provide novel insights into how elites' redistributive preferences may shape high levels of inequality and limited redistributive policy in the United States.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2025; v1 submitted 19 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Inequality of Opportunity and Income Redistribution
Authors:
Marcel Preuss,
Germán Reyes,
Jason Somerville,
Joy Wu
Abstract:
Opportunities, such as access to education or family background, shape income inequality by influencing the chances of economic success. Unequal opportunities create uncertainty about whether success is merit- or luck-based. We examine how uncertainty impacts preferences for redistribution, comparing it to more transparent forms of luck. Using a U.S.-representative sample, we elicit redistribution…
▽ More
Opportunities, such as access to education or family background, shape income inequality by influencing the chances of economic success. Unequal opportunities create uncertainty about whether success is merit- or luck-based. We examine how uncertainty impacts preferences for redistribution, comparing it to more transparent forms of luck. Using a U.S.-representative sample, we elicit redistribution decisions in two environments: when workers' earnings are influenced by luck directly ("lucky outcomes") or indirectly ("lucky opportunities"). Spectators redistribute less and are less sensitive to differences in luck under opportunities. Inferential challenges drive this gap, which implies that individuals are less meritocratic than previous findings suggest.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2025; v1 submitted 1 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
