Bias Analysis of Experiments for Multi-Item Multi-Period Inventory Control Policies
Authors:
Xinqi Chen,
Xingyu Bai,
Zeyu Zheng,
Nian Si
Abstract:
Randomized experiments, or A/B testing, are the gold standard for evaluating interventions but are underutilized in the area of inventory management. This study addresses this gap by analyzing A/B testing strategies in multi-item, multi-period inventory systems with lost sales and capacity constraints. We examine switchback experiments, item-level randomization, pairwise randomization, and stagger…
▽ More
Randomized experiments, or A/B testing, are the gold standard for evaluating interventions but are underutilized in the area of inventory management. This study addresses this gap by analyzing A/B testing strategies in multi-item, multi-period inventory systems with lost sales and capacity constraints. We examine switchback experiments, item-level randomization, pairwise randomization, and staggered rollouts, analyzing their biases theoretically and comparing them through numerical experiments. Our findings provide actionable guidance for selecting experimental designs across various contexts in inventory management.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2025;
originally announced January 2025.
Tackling Interference Induced by Data Training Loops in A/B Tests: A Weighted Training Approach
Authors:
Nian Si
Abstract:
In modern recommendation systems, the standard pipeline involves training machine learning models on historical data to predict user behaviors and improve recommendations continuously. However, these data training loops can introduce interference in A/B tests, where data generated by control and treatment algorithms, potentially with different distributions, are combined. To address these challeng…
▽ More
In modern recommendation systems, the standard pipeline involves training machine learning models on historical data to predict user behaviors and improve recommendations continuously. However, these data training loops can introduce interference in A/B tests, where data generated by control and treatment algorithms, potentially with different distributions, are combined. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel approach called weighted training. This approach entails training a model to predict the probability of each data point appearing in either the treatment or control data and subsequently applying weighted losses during model training. We demonstrate that this approach achieves the least variance among all estimators that do not cause shifts in the training distributions. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate the lower bias and variance of our approach compared to other methods.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
