-
Should Politicians be Informed? Targeted Benefits and Heterogeneous Voters
Authors:
Maxim Senkov,
Arseniy Samsonov
Abstract:
We compare two scenarios in a model where politicians offer local public goods to heterogeneous voters: one where politicians have access to data on voters and thus can target specific ones, and another where politicians only decide on the level of spending. When the budget is small, or the public good has a high value, access to voter information leads the winner to focus on poorer voters, enhanc…
▽ More
We compare two scenarios in a model where politicians offer local public goods to heterogeneous voters: one where politicians have access to data on voters and thus can target specific ones, and another where politicians only decide on the level of spending. When the budget is small, or the public good has a high value, access to voter information leads the winner to focus on poorer voters, enhancing voter welfare. With a larger budget or less crucial public goods, politicians target a narrow group of swing voters, which harms the voter welfare.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Changing Simplistic Worldviews
Authors:
Maxim Senkov,
Toygar T. Kerman
Abstract:
We study a Bayesian persuasion model with two-dimensional states of the world, in which the sender (she) and receiver (he) have heterogeneous prior beliefs and care about different dimensions. The receiver is a naive agent who has a simplistic worldview: he ignores the dependency between the two dimensions of the state. We provide a characterization for the sender's gain from persuasion both when…
▽ More
We study a Bayesian persuasion model with two-dimensional states of the world, in which the sender (she) and receiver (he) have heterogeneous prior beliefs and care about different dimensions. The receiver is a naive agent who has a simplistic worldview: he ignores the dependency between the two dimensions of the state. We provide a characterization for the sender's gain from persuasion both when the receiver is naive and when he is rational. We show that the receiver benefits from having a simplistic worldview if and only if it makes him perceive the states in which his interest is aligned with the sender as less likely.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Setting Interim Deadlines to Persuade
Authors:
Maxim Senkov
Abstract:
A principal funds a multistage project and retains the right to cut the funding if it stagnates at some point. An agent wants to convince the principal to fund the project as long as possible, and can design the flow of information about the progress of the project in order to persuade the principal. If the project is sufficiently promising ex ante, then the agent commits to providing only the goo…
▽ More
A principal funds a multistage project and retains the right to cut the funding if it stagnates at some point. An agent wants to convince the principal to fund the project as long as possible, and can design the flow of information about the progress of the project in order to persuade the principal. If the project is sufficiently promising ex ante, then the agent commits to providing only the good news that the project is accomplished. If the project is not promising enough ex ante, the agent persuades the principal to start the funding by committing to provide not only good news but also the bad news that a project milestone has not been reached by an interim deadline. I demonstrate that the outlined structure of optimal information disclosure holds irrespective of the agent's profit share, benefit from the flow of funding, and the common discount rate.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2023; v1 submitted 15 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Optimally Biased Expertise
Authors:
Pavel Ilinov,
Andrei Matveenko,
Maxim Senkov,
Egor Starkov
Abstract:
We show that in delegation problems, a principal benefits from belief misalignment vis-à-vis an agent when the latter can flexibly acquire costly information. The agent optimally succumbs to confirmatory learning, leading him to favor the ex ante optimal action. We show that the principal prefers to mitigate this by hiring an agent who is ex ante more uncertain about which action is optimal. This…
▽ More
We show that in delegation problems, a principal benefits from belief misalignment vis-à-vis an agent when the latter can flexibly acquire costly information. The agent optimally succumbs to confirmatory learning, leading him to favor the ex ante optimal action. We show that the principal prefers to mitigate this by hiring an agent who is ex ante more uncertain about which action is optimal. This is optimal even when the principal is herself biased towards some action: the benefit always outweighs the cost of a small misalignment. Optimally misaligned agent considers weakly more actions than an aligned agent. All results continue to hold when delegation is replaced by communication.
△ Less
Submitted 29 July, 2025; v1 submitted 27 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
