-
Non-Bayesian Learning in Misspecified Models
Authors:
Sebastian Bervoets,
Mathieu Faure,
Ludovic Renou
Abstract:
Deviations from Bayesian updating are traditionally categorized as biases, errors, or fallacies, thus implying their inherent ``sub-optimality.'' We offer a more nuanced view. We demonstrate that, in learning problems with misspecified models, non-Bayesian updating can outperform Bayesian updating.
Deviations from Bayesian updating are traditionally categorized as biases, errors, or fallacies, thus implying their inherent ``sub-optimality.'' We offer a more nuanced view. We demonstrate that, in learning problems with misspecified models, non-Bayesian updating can outperform Bayesian updating.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2025; v1 submitted 23 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Persuasion with Ambiguous Communication
Authors:
Xiaoyu Cheng,
Peter Klibanoff,
Sujoy Mukerji,
Ludovic Renou
Abstract:
This paper explores whether and to what extent ambiguous communication can be beneficial to the sender in a persuasion problem, when the receiver (and possibly the sender) is ambiguity averse. We provide a concavification-like characterization of the sender's optimal ambiguous communication. The characterization highlights the necessity of using a collection of experiments that form a splitting of…
▽ More
This paper explores whether and to what extent ambiguous communication can be beneficial to the sender in a persuasion problem, when the receiver (and possibly the sender) is ambiguity averse. We provide a concavification-like characterization of the sender's optimal ambiguous communication. The characterization highlights the necessity of using a collection of experiments that form a splitting of an obedient (i.e., incentive compatible) experiment. Some experiments in the collection must be Pareto-ranked in the sense that both players agree on their payoff ranking. The existence of a binary such Pareto-ranked splitting is necessary for ambiguous communication to benefit the sender, and, if an optimal Bayesian persuasion experiment can be split in this way, this is sufficient for an ambiguity-neutral sender as well as the receiver to benefit. Such gains are impossible when the receiver has only two actions. The possibility of gains is substantially robust to (non-extreme) sender ambiguity aversion.
△ Less
Submitted 8 November, 2024; v1 submitted 7 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Comparing experiments in discounted problems
Authors:
Ludovic Renou,
Xavier Venel
Abstract:
This paper compares statistical experiments in discounted problems, ranging from the simplest ones where the state is fixed and the flow of information exogenous to more complex ones, where the decision-maker controls the flow of information or the state changes over time.
This paper compares statistical experiments in discounted problems, ranging from the simplest ones where the state is fixed and the flow of information exogenous to more complex ones, where the decision-maker controls the flow of information or the state changes over time.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2025; v1 submitted 26 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Dynamic Choices and Common Learning
Authors:
Rahul Deb,
Ludovic Renou
Abstract:
A researcher observes a finite sequence of choices made by multiple agents in a binary-state environment. Agents maximize expected utilities that depend on their chosen alternative and the unknown underlying state. Agents learn about the time-varying state from the same information and their actions change because of the evolving common belief. The researcher does not observe agents' preferences,…
▽ More
A researcher observes a finite sequence of choices made by multiple agents in a binary-state environment. Agents maximize expected utilities that depend on their chosen alternative and the unknown underlying state. Agents learn about the time-varying state from the same information and their actions change because of the evolving common belief. The researcher does not observe agents' preferences, the prior, the common information and the stochastic process for the state. We characterize the set of choices that are rationalized by this model and generalize the information environments to allow for private information. We discuss the implications of our results for uncovering discrimination and committee decision making.
△ Less
Submitted 8 May, 2021;
originally announced May 2021.
-
Cross-verification and Persuasive Cheap Talk
Authors:
Alp Atakan,
Mehmet Ekmekci,
Ludovic Renou
Abstract:
We study a cheap-talk game where two experts first choose what information to acquire and then offer advice to a decision-maker whose actions affect the welfare of all. The experts cannot commit to reporting strategies. Yet, we show that the decision-maker's ability to cross-verify the experts' advice acts as a commitment device for the experts. We prove the existence of an equilibrium, where an e…
▽ More
We study a cheap-talk game where two experts first choose what information to acquire and then offer advice to a decision-maker whose actions affect the welfare of all. The experts cannot commit to reporting strategies. Yet, we show that the decision-maker's ability to cross-verify the experts' advice acts as a commitment device for the experts. We prove the existence of an equilibrium, where an expert's equilibrium payoff is equal to what he would obtain if he could commit to truthfully revealing his information.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021; v1 submitted 26 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Information Design in Multi-stage Games
Authors:
Miltiadis Makris,
Ludovic Renou
Abstract:
This paper generalizes the concept of Bayes correlated equilibrium (Bergemann and Morris, 2016) to multi-stage games. We demonstrate the power of our characterization results by applying them to a number of illustrative examples and applications.
This paper generalizes the concept of Bayes correlated equilibrium (Bergemann and Morris, 2016) to multi-stage games. We demonstrate the power of our characterization results by applying them to a number of illustrative examples and applications.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2021; v1 submitted 26 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Contracting over persistent information
Authors:
Wei Zhao,
Claudio Mezzetti,
Ludovic Renou,
Tristan Tomala
Abstract:
We consider a dynamic moral hazard problem between a principal and an agent, where the sole instrument the principal has to incentivize the agent is the disclosure of information. The principal aims at maximizing the (discounted) number of times the agent chooses a particular action, e.g., to work hard. We show that there exists an optimal contract, where the principal stops disclosing information…
▽ More
We consider a dynamic moral hazard problem between a principal and an agent, where the sole instrument the principal has to incentivize the agent is the disclosure of information. The principal aims at maximizing the (discounted) number of times the agent chooses a particular action, e.g., to work hard. We show that there exists an optimal contract, where the principal stops disclosing information as soon as its most preferred action is a static best reply for the agent or else continues disclosing information until the agent perfectly learns the principal's private information. If the agent perfectly learns the state, he learns it in finite time with probability one; the more patient the agent, the later he learns it.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2021; v1 submitted 12 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Robust communication on networks
Authors:
Marie Laclau,
Ludovic Renou,
Xavier Venel
Abstract:
We consider sender-receiver games, where the sender and the receiver are two distinct nodes in a communication network. Communication between the sender and the receiver is thus indirect. We ask when it is possible to robustly implement the equilibrium outcomes of the direct communication game as equilibrium outcomes of indirect communication games on the network. Robust implementation requires th…
▽ More
We consider sender-receiver games, where the sender and the receiver are two distinct nodes in a communication network. Communication between the sender and the receiver is thus indirect. We ask when it is possible to robustly implement the equilibrium outcomes of the direct communication game as equilibrium outcomes of indirect communication games on the network. Robust implementation requires that: (i) the implementation is independent of the preferences of the intermediaries and (ii) the implementation is guaranteed at all histories consistent with unilateral deviations by the intermediaries. Robust implementation of direct communication is possible if and only if either the sender and receiver are directly connected or there exist two disjoint paths between the sender and the receiver.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2020; v1 submitted 1 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
