Entangled vs. Separable Choice
Authors:
Nail Kashaev,
Martin Plávala,
Victor H. Aguiar
Abstract:
We investigate joint probabilistic choice rules describing the behavior of two decision makers, each facing potentially distinct menus. These rules are separable when they can be decomposed into individual choices correlated solely through their respective probabilistic choice rules. Despite its significant interest for the study of peer effects, influence, and taste variation, a complete characte…
▽ More
We investigate joint probabilistic choice rules describing the behavior of two decision makers, each facing potentially distinct menus. These rules are separable when they can be decomposed into individual choices correlated solely through their respective probabilistic choice rules. Despite its significant interest for the study of peer effects, influence, and taste variation, a complete characterization of these rules has remained elusive (Chambers, Masatlioglu, and Turansick, 2021). We fully characterize separable choices through a finite system of inequalities inspired by Afriat's theorem. Our results address the possibility of entangled choices, where decision makers behave as if they do not communicate, yet their choices are not separable. More generally, we establish that separable joint choice restrictions can be factored into individual choice restrictions if only if at least one decision maker's probabilistic choice rule uniquely identifies the distribution over deterministic choice rules. The no communication condition and the individual restrictions are no longer sufficient in the absence of this uniqueness. Our results offer robust tools for distinguishing between separable decision-making and behaviors beyond mere peer effects such as imitation and cheating.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2024; v1 submitted 13 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Dynamic and Stochastic Rational Behavior
Authors:
Nail Kashaev,
Victor H. Aguiar,
Martin Plávala,
Charles Gauthier
Abstract:
The (static) utility maximization model of Afriat (1967), which is the standard in analysing choice behavior, is under scrutiny. We propose the Dynamic Random Utility Model (DRUM) that is more flexible than the framework of Afriat (1967) and more informative than the static Random Utility Model (RUM) framework of McFadden and Richter (1990). Under DRUM, each decision-maker randomly draws a utility…
▽ More
The (static) utility maximization model of Afriat (1967), which is the standard in analysing choice behavior, is under scrutiny. We propose the Dynamic Random Utility Model (DRUM) that is more flexible than the framework of Afriat (1967) and more informative than the static Random Utility Model (RUM) framework of McFadden and Richter (1990). Under DRUM, each decision-maker randomly draws a utility function in each period and maximizes it subject to a menu. DRUM allows for unrestricted time correlation and cross-section heterogeneity in preferences. We characterize DRUM for situations when panel data on choices and menus are available. DRUM is linked to a finite mixture of deterministic behaviors that can be represented as a product of static rationalizable behaviors. This link allows us to convert the characterizations of the static RUM to its dynamic form. In an application, we find that although the static utility maximization model fails to explain population behavior, DRUM can explain it.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2023; v1 submitted 8 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
