-
Optimal Policy Choices Under Uncertainty
Authors:
Sarah Moon
Abstract:
Policymakers often make changes to policies whose benefits and costs are unknown and must be inferred from statistical estimates in empirical studies. The sample estimates are noisier for some policies than for others, which should be adjusted for when comparing policy changes in decision-making. In this paper I consider the problem of a planner who makes changes to upfront spending on a set of po…
▽ More
Policymakers often make changes to policies whose benefits and costs are unknown and must be inferred from statistical estimates in empirical studies. The sample estimates are noisier for some policies than for others, which should be adjusted for when comparing policy changes in decision-making. In this paper I consider the problem of a planner who makes changes to upfront spending on a set of policies to maximize social welfare but faces statistical uncertainty about the impact of those changes. I set up an optimization problem that is tractable under statistical uncertainty and solve for the Bayes risk-minimizing decision rule. I propose an empirical Bayes approach to approximating the optimal decision rule when the planner does not know a prior. I show theoretically that the empirical Bayes decision rule can approximate the optimal decision rule well, including in cases where a sample plug-in rule does not.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Inference for Treatment Effects Conditional on Generalized Principal Strata using Instrumental Variables
Authors:
Yuehao Bai,
Shunzhuang Huang,
Sarah Moon,
Andres Santos,
Azeem M. Shaikh,
Edward J. Vytlacil
Abstract:
In a setting with a multi-valued outcome, treatment and instrument, this paper considers the problem of inference for a general class of treatment effect parameters. The class of parameters considered are those that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. Here, the response type simply refers to the vector of potential…
▽ More
In a setting with a multi-valued outcome, treatment and instrument, this paper considers the problem of inference for a general class of treatment effect parameters. The class of parameters considered are those that can be expressed as the expectation of a function of the response type conditional on a generalized principal stratum. Here, the response type simply refers to the vector of potential outcomes and potential treatments, and a generalized principal stratum is a set of possible values for the response type. In addition to instrument exogeneity, the main substantive restriction imposed rules out certain values for the response types in the sense that they are assumed to occur with probability zero. It is shown through a series of examples that this framework includes a wide variety of parameters and assumptions that have been considered in the previous literature. A key result in our analysis is a characterization of the identified set for such parameters under these assumptions in terms of existence of a non-negative solution to linear systems of equations with a special structure. We propose methods for inference exploiting this special structure and recent results in Fang et al. (2023).
△ Less
Submitted 7 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
On the Identifying Power of Monotonicity for Average Treatment Effects
Authors:
Yuehao Bai,
Shunzhuang Huang,
Sarah Moon,
Azeem M. Shaikh,
Edward J. Vytlacil
Abstract:
In the context of a binary outcome, treatment, and instrument, Balke and Pearl (1993, 1997) establish that the monotonicity condition of Imbens and Angrist (1994) has no identifying power beyond instrument exogeneity for average potential outcomes and average treatment effects in the sense that adding it to instrument exogeneity does not decrease the identified sets for those parameters whenever t…
▽ More
In the context of a binary outcome, treatment, and instrument, Balke and Pearl (1993, 1997) establish that the monotonicity condition of Imbens and Angrist (1994) has no identifying power beyond instrument exogeneity for average potential outcomes and average treatment effects in the sense that adding it to instrument exogeneity does not decrease the identified sets for those parameters whenever those restrictions are consistent with the distribution of the observable data. This paper shows that this phenomenon holds in a broader setting with a multi-valued outcome, treatment, and instrument, under an extension of the monotonicity condition that we refer to as generalized monotonicity. We further show that this phenomenon holds for any restriction on treatment response that is stronger than generalized monotonicity provided that these stronger restrictions do not restrict potential outcomes. Importantly, many models of potential treatments previously considered in the literature imply generalized monotonicity, including the types of monotonicity restrictions considered by Kline and Walters (2016), Kirkeboen et al. (2016), and Heckman and Pinto (2018), and the restriction that treatment selection is determined by particular classes of additive random utility models. We show through a series of examples that restrictions on potential treatments can provide identifying power beyond instrument exogeneity for average potential outcomes and average treatment effects when the restrictions imply that the generalized monotonicity condition is violated. In this way, our results shed light on the types of restrictions required for help in identifying average potential outcomes and average treatment effects.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2025; v1 submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Partial Identification of Individual-Level Parameters Using Aggregate Data in a Nonparametric Model
Authors:
Sarah Moon
Abstract:
I develop a methodology to partially identify linear combinations of conditional mean outcomes when the researcher only has access to aggregate data. Unlike the existing literature, I only allow for marginal, not joint, distributions of covariates in my model of aggregate data. Identified sets are very wide in an empirical illustration, suggesting that in order to obtain useful results when only u…
▽ More
I develop a methodology to partially identify linear combinations of conditional mean outcomes when the researcher only has access to aggregate data. Unlike the existing literature, I only allow for marginal, not joint, distributions of covariates in my model of aggregate data. Identified sets are very wide in an empirical illustration, suggesting that in order to obtain useful results when only using aggregate data, researchers may have no option other than to impose strong assumptions.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2025; v1 submitted 11 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
