Showing 1–3 of 3 results for author: Molavi, P

Informational Autocrats, Diverse Societies

Authors: A. Arda Gitmez, Pooya Molavi

Abstract: This paper presents a theoretical model of an autocrat who controls the media in an attempt to persuade society of his competence. We base our analysis on a Bayesian persuasion framework in which citizens have heterogeneous preferences and beliefs about the autocrat. We characterize the autocrat's information manipulation strategy when society is monolithic and when it is divided. When the prefere… ▽ More This paper presents a theoretical model of an autocrat who controls the media in an attempt to persuade society of his competence. We base our analysis on a Bayesian persuasion framework in which citizens have heterogeneous preferences and beliefs about the autocrat. We characterize the autocrat's information manipulation strategy when society is monolithic and when it is divided. When the preferences and beliefs in society are more diverse, the autocrat engages in less information manipulation. Our findings thus suggest that the diversity of attitudes and opinions can act as a bulwark against information manipulation by hostile actors. △ Less

Submitted 25 August, 2023; v1 submitted 23 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

Simple Models and Biased Forecasts

Authors: Pooya Molavi

Abstract: This paper proposes a framework in which agents are constrained to use simple models to forecast economic variables and characterizes the resulting biases. It considers agents who can only entertain state-space models with no more than d states, where d measures the intertemporal complexity of a model. Agents are boundedly rational in that they can only consider models that are too simple to captu… ▽ More This paper proposes a framework in which agents are constrained to use simple models to forecast economic variables and characterizes the resulting biases. It considers agents who can only entertain state-space models with no more than d states, where d measures the intertemporal complexity of a model. Agents are boundedly rational in that they can only consider models that are too simple to capture the true process, yet they use the best model among those considered. Using simple models adds persistence to forward-looking decisions and increases the comovement among them. This mechanism narrows the gap between business-cycle theory and data. In a new neoclassical synthesis model, the assumption that agents use simple models fits the data much better than the rational-expectations hypothesis. Moreover, simple models simultaneously resolve the Barro-King and forward guidance puzzles while improving the propagation of TFP shocks. △ Less

Submitted 9 October, 2024; v1 submitted 14 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

The Empirical Content of Bayesianism

Authors: Pooya Molavi

Abstract: This paper characterizes the conditions under which the observed beliefs of a group of agents are consistent with Bayesian updating. Beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if they arise from the application of Bayes' rule given some subjective distribution for the state and the signals agents observe between periods. The paper's main finding is that beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if and… ▽ More This paper characterizes the conditions under which the observed beliefs of a group of agents are consistent with Bayesian updating. Beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if they arise from the application of Bayes' rule given some subjective distribution for the state and the signals agents observe between periods. The paper's main finding is that beliefs are consistent with Bayesianism if and only if the mean of the distribution of posteriors is uniformly absolutely continuous with respect to the prior. Furthermore, the paper shows that the existing results on the empirical content of Bayesianism rely on additional restrictions on permissible subjective distributions, such as the requirement that agents have correct beliefs about the distribution of signals. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2024; v1 submitted 14 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.