-
Persuasion Effects in Regression Discontinuity Designs
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
We develop a framework for identifying and estimating persuasion effects in regression discontinuity (RD) designs. The RD persuasion rate measures the probability that individuals at the threshold would take the action if exposed to a persuasive message, given that they would not take the action without exposure. We present identification results for both sharp and fuzzy RD designs, derive sharp b…
▽ More
We develop a framework for identifying and estimating persuasion effects in regression discontinuity (RD) designs. The RD persuasion rate measures the probability that individuals at the threshold would take the action if exposed to a persuasive message, given that they would not take the action without exposure. We present identification results for both sharp and fuzzy RD designs, derive sharp bounds under various data scenarios, and extend the analysis to local compliers. Estimation and inference rely on local polynomial regression, enabling straightforward implementation with standard RD tools. Applications to public health and media illustrate its empirical relevance.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2025;
originally announced September 2025.
-
Bounding the Effect of Persuasion with Monotonicity Assumptions: Reassessing the Impact of TV Debates
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
Televised debates between presidential candidates are often regarded as the exemplar of persuasive communication. Yet, recent evidence from Le Pennec and Pons (2023) indicates that they may not sway voters as strongly as popular belief suggests. We revisit their findings through the lens of the persuasion rate and introduce a robust framework that does not require exogenous treatment, parallel tre…
▽ More
Televised debates between presidential candidates are often regarded as the exemplar of persuasive communication. Yet, recent evidence from Le Pennec and Pons (2023) indicates that they may not sway voters as strongly as popular belief suggests. We revisit their findings through the lens of the persuasion rate and introduce a robust framework that does not require exogenous treatment, parallel trends, or credible instruments. Instead, we leverage plausible monotonicity assumptions to partially identify the persuasion rate and related parameters. Our results reaffirm that the sharp upper bounds on the persuasive effects of TV debates remain modest.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2025; v1 submitted 7 March, 2025;
originally announced March 2025.
-
Learning the Effect of Persuasion via Difference-In-Differences
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
The persuasion rate is a key parameter for measuring the causal effect of a directional message on influencing the recipient's behavior. Its identification has relied on exogenous treatment or the availability of credible instruments, but the requirements are not always satisfied in observational studies. Therefore, we develop a novel econometric framework for the average persuasion rate on the tr…
▽ More
The persuasion rate is a key parameter for measuring the causal effect of a directional message on influencing the recipient's behavior. Its identification has relied on exogenous treatment or the availability of credible instruments, but the requirements are not always satisfied in observational studies. Therefore, we develop a novel econometric framework for the average persuasion rate on the treated and other related parameters by using the difference-in-differences approach. The average treatment effect on the treated is a standard parameter in difference-in-differences, but we show that it is an overly conservative measure in the context of persuasion. For estimation and inference, we propose regression-based approaches as well as semiparametrically efficient estimators. Beginning with the two-period case, we extend the framework to staggered treatment settings, where we show how to conduct richer analyses like the event-study design. We investigate the British election and the Chinese curriculum reform as empirical examples.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2024; v1 submitted 18 October, 2024;
originally announced October 2024.
-
Average Adjusted Association: Efficient Estimation with High Dimensional Confounders
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
The log odds ratio is a well-established metric for evaluating the association between binary outcome and exposure variables. Despite its widespread use, there has been limited discussion on how to summarize the log odds ratio as a function of confounders through averaging. To address this issue, we propose the Average Adjusted Association (AAA), which is a summary measure of association in a hete…
▽ More
The log odds ratio is a well-established metric for evaluating the association between binary outcome and exposure variables. Despite its widespread use, there has been limited discussion on how to summarize the log odds ratio as a function of confounders through averaging. To address this issue, we propose the Average Adjusted Association (AAA), which is a summary measure of association in a heterogeneous population, adjusted for observed confounders. To facilitate the use of it, we also develop efficient double/debiased machine learning (DML) estimators of the AAA. Our DML estimators use two equivalent forms of the efficient influence function, and are applicable in various sampling scenarios, including random sampling, outcome-based sampling, and exposure-based sampling. Through real data and simulations, we demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of our proposed estimators in measuring the AAA.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2023; v1 submitted 27 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Causal Inference under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
We study causal inference under case-control and case-population sampling. Specifically, we focus on the binary-outcome and binary-treatment case, where the parameters of interest are causal relative and attributable risks defined via the potential outcome framework. It is shown that strong ignorability is not always as powerful as it is under random sampling and that certain monotonicity assumpti…
▽ More
We study causal inference under case-control and case-population sampling. Specifically, we focus on the binary-outcome and binary-treatment case, where the parameters of interest are causal relative and attributable risks defined via the potential outcome framework. It is shown that strong ignorability is not always as powerful as it is under random sampling and that certain monotonicity assumptions yield comparable results in terms of sharp identified intervals. Specifically, the usual odds ratio is shown to be a sharp identified upper bound on causal relative risk under the monotone treatment response and monotone treatment selection assumptions. We offer algorithms for inference on the causal parameters that are aggregated over the true population distribution of the covariates. We show the usefulness of our approach by studying three empirical examples: the benefit of attending private school for entering a prestigious university in Pakistan; the relationship between staying in school and getting involved with drug-trafficking gangs in Brazil; and the link between physicians' hours and size of the group practice in the United States.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2023; v1 submitted 17 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Identifying the Effect of Persuasion
Authors:
Sung Jae Jun,
Sokbae Lee
Abstract:
This paper examines a commonly used measure of persuasion whose precise interpretation has been obscure in the literature. By using the potential outcome framework, we define the causal persuasion rate by a proper conditional probability of taking the action of interest with a persuasive message conditional on not taking the action without the message. We then formally study identification under e…
▽ More
This paper examines a commonly used measure of persuasion whose precise interpretation has been obscure in the literature. By using the potential outcome framework, we define the causal persuasion rate by a proper conditional probability of taking the action of interest with a persuasive message conditional on not taking the action without the message. We then formally study identification under empirically relevant data scenarios and show that the commonly adopted measure generally does not estimate, but often overstates, the causal rate of persuasion. We discuss several new parameters of interest and provide practical methods for causal inference.
△ Less
Submitted 30 November, 2022; v1 submitted 5 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
