-
Model-based Estimation of Difference-in-Differences with Staggered Treatments
Authors:
Siddhartha Chib,
Kenichi Shimizu
Abstract:
We propose a model-based framework for estimating treatment effects in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) designs with multiple time-periods and variation in treatment timing. We first present a simple model for potential outcomes that respects the identifying conditions for the average treatment effects on the treated (ATT's). The model-based perspective is particularly valuable in applications with…
▽ More
We propose a model-based framework for estimating treatment effects in Difference-in-Differences (DiD) designs with multiple time-periods and variation in treatment timing. We first present a simple model for potential outcomes that respects the identifying conditions for the average treatment effects on the treated (ATT's). The model-based perspective is particularly valuable in applications with small sample sizes, where existing estimators that rely on asymptotic arguments may yield poor approximations to the sampling distribution of group-time ATT's. To improve parsimony and guide prior elicitation, we reparametrize the model in a way that reduces the effective number of parameters. Prior information about treatment effects is incorporated through black-box training sample priors and, in small-sample settings, by thick-tailed t-priors that shrink ATT's of small magnitudes toward zero. We provide a straightforward and computationally efficient Bayesian estimation procedure and establish a Bernstein-von Mises-type result that justifies posterior inference for the treatment effects. Simulation studies confirm that our method performs well in both large and small samples, offering credible uncertainty quantification even in settings that challenge standard estimators. We illustrate the practical value of the method through an empirical application that examines the effect of minimum wage increases on teen employment in the United States.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2025;
originally announced May 2025.
-
Stochastic Volatility in Mean: Efficient Analysis by a Generalized Mixture Sampler
Authors:
Daichi Hiraki,
Siddhartha Chib,
Yasuhiro Omori
Abstract:
In this paper we consider the simulation-based Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility in mean (SVM) models. Extending the highly efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo mixture sampler for the SV model proposed in Kim et al. (1998) and Omori et al. (2007), we develop an accurate approximation of the non-central chi-squared distribution as a mixture of thirty normal distributions. Under this mixture…
▽ More
In this paper we consider the simulation-based Bayesian analysis of stochastic volatility in mean (SVM) models. Extending the highly efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo mixture sampler for the SV model proposed in Kim et al. (1998) and Omori et al. (2007), we develop an accurate approximation of the non-central chi-squared distribution as a mixture of thirty normal distributions. Under this mixture representation, we sample the parameters and latent volatilities in one block. We also detail a correction of the small approximation error by using additional Metropolis-Hastings steps. The proposed method is extended to the SVM model with leverage. The methodology and models are applied to excess holding yields and S&P500 returns in empirical studies, and the SVM models are shown to outperform other volatility models based on marginal likelihoods.
△ Less
Submitted 20 November, 2024; v1 submitted 22 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Scalable Estimation of Multinomial Response Models with Random Consideration Sets
Authors:
Siddhartha Chib,
Kenichi Shimizu
Abstract:
A common assumption in the fitting of unordered multinomial response models for $J$ mutually exclusive categories is that the responses arise from the same set of $J$ categories across subjects. However, when responses measure a choice made by the subject, it is more appropriate to condition the distribution of multinomial responses on a subject-specific consideration set, drawn from the power set…
▽ More
A common assumption in the fitting of unordered multinomial response models for $J$ mutually exclusive categories is that the responses arise from the same set of $J$ categories across subjects. However, when responses measure a choice made by the subject, it is more appropriate to condition the distribution of multinomial responses on a subject-specific consideration set, drawn from the power set of $\{1,2,\ldots,J\}$. This leads to a mixture of multinomial response models governed by a probability distribution over the $J^{\ast} = 2^J -1$ consideration sets. We introduce a novel method for estimating such generalized multinomial response models based on the fundamental result that any mass distribution over $J^{\ast}$ consideration sets can be represented as a mixture of products of $J$ component-specific inclusion-exclusion probabilities. Moreover, under time-invariant consideration sets, the conditional posterior distribution of consideration sets is sparse. These features enable a scalable MCMC algorithm for sampling the posterior distribution of parameters, random effects, and consideration sets. Under regularity conditions, the posterior distributions of the marginal response probabilities and the model parameters satisfy consistency. The methodology is demonstrated in a longitudinal data set on weekly cereal purchases that cover $J = 101$ brands, a dimension substantially beyond the reach of existing methods.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2025; v1 submitted 23 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Bayesian Estimation and Comparison of Conditional Moment Models
Authors:
Siddhartha Chib,
Minchul Shin,
Anna Simoni
Abstract:
We consider the Bayesian analysis of models in which the unknown distribution of the outcomes is specified up to a set of conditional moment restrictions. The nonparametric exponentially tilted empirical likelihood function is constructed to satisfy a sequence of unconditional moments based on an increasing (in sample size) vector of approximating functions (such as tensor splines based on the spl…
▽ More
We consider the Bayesian analysis of models in which the unknown distribution of the outcomes is specified up to a set of conditional moment restrictions. The nonparametric exponentially tilted empirical likelihood function is constructed to satisfy a sequence of unconditional moments based on an increasing (in sample size) vector of approximating functions (such as tensor splines based on the splines of each conditioning variable). For any given sample size, results are robust to the number of expanded moments. We derive Bernstein-von Mises theorems for the behavior of the posterior distribution under both correct and incorrect specification of the conditional moments, subject to growth rate conditions (slower under misspecification) on the number of approximating functions. A large-sample theory for comparing different conditional moment models is also developed. The central result is that the marginal likelihood criterion selects the model that is less misspecified. We also introduce sparsity-based model search for high-dimensional conditioning variables, and provide efficient MCMC computations for high-dimensional parameters. Along with clarifying examples, the framework is illustrated with real-data applications to risk-factor determination in finance, and causal inference under conditional ignorability.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
