-
Disagreement Spillovers
Authors:
Giampaolo Bonomi
Abstract:
As US political party leaders increasingly take stances both on economic and cultural (i.e., social policy) issues, the economic views of opposite cultural groups are growing apart. This paper explores a novel explanation for this phenomenon. I provide experimental evidence that adding social policy content to a policy message pushes those disagreeing with the social policy to disagree also with t…
▽ More
As US political party leaders increasingly take stances both on economic and cultural (i.e., social policy) issues, the economic views of opposite cultural groups are growing apart. This paper explores a novel explanation for this phenomenon. I provide experimental evidence that adding social policy content to a policy message pushes those disagreeing with the social policy to disagree also with the economic content of the message. As my results suggest regular deviations from Bayesian explanations, I propose a model of identity-based belief updating that predicts the main regularities found in the experiment. Finally, I shed light on opinion leaders' incentives to strengthen the association between social policy and economic policy views.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2025; v1 submitted 17 November, 2024;
originally announced November 2024.
-
Divide and Diverge: Polarization Incentives
Authors:
Giampaolo Bonomi
Abstract:
We study polarization in a probabilistic voting model with aggregate shocks and a decreasing marginal utility from office rents. In equilibrium, parties offer different policies, despite being rent-motivated and ex-ante identical from the point of view of voters. When candidates compete on a single policy issue, parties' equilibrium payoffs increase in voter polarization, even when the change is d…
▽ More
We study polarization in a probabilistic voting model with aggregate shocks and a decreasing marginal utility from office rents. In equilibrium, parties offer different policies, despite being rent-motivated and ex-ante identical from the point of view of voters. When candidates compete on a single policy issue, parties' equilibrium payoffs increase in voter polarization, even when the change is driven by the supporters of the opposite party becoming more extreme. With multiple policy issues, parties benefit if the society is split into two factions and the ideological cohesion within such factions increases. We connect our results to empirical evidence on polarizing political communication, party identity, and zero-sum thinking, and find that polarization could be reduced by intervening on the electoral rule.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2025; v1 submitted 30 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
The Disagreement Dividend
Authors:
Giampaolo Bonomi
Abstract:
We study how disagreement influences team performance in a dynamic game with positive production externalities. Players can hold different views about the productivity of the available production technologies. This disagreement results in different technology and effort choices -- "optimistic" views induce higher effort than "skeptical" views. Views are changed when falsified by evidence. With a s…
▽ More
We study how disagreement influences team performance in a dynamic game with positive production externalities. Players can hold different views about the productivity of the available production technologies. This disagreement results in different technology and effort choices -- "optimistic" views induce higher effort than "skeptical" views. Views are changed when falsified by evidence. With a single technology available, optimists exert more effort early on if the team also includes skeptics. With sufficiently strong externalities, a disagreeing team produces, on average, more than any like-minded team. With multiple technologies, disagreement over which technology works best motivates everyone to exert more effort.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2024; v1 submitted 12 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Kites and Quails: Monetary Policy and Communication with Strategic Financial Markets
Authors:
Giampaolo Bonomi,
Ali Uppal
Abstract:
We propose a model to study the consequences of including financial stability among the central bank's objectives when market players are strategic, and surprises compromise their stability. In this setup, central banks underreact to economic shocks, a prediction consistent with the Federal Reserve's behavior during the 2023 banking crisis. Moreover, policymakers' stability concerns bias investors…
▽ More
We propose a model to study the consequences of including financial stability among the central bank's objectives when market players are strategic, and surprises compromise their stability. In this setup, central banks underreact to economic shocks, a prediction consistent with the Federal Reserve's behavior during the 2023 banking crisis. Moreover, policymakers' stability concerns bias investors' choices, inducing inefficiency. If the central bank has private information about its policy intentions, the equilibrium forward guidance entails an information loss, highlighting a trade-off between stabilizing markets through policy and communication. A "kitish" central banker, who puts less weight on stability, reduces these inefficiencies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 May, 2024; v1 submitted 15 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
