Smart Grid Co-Simulation with MOSAIK and HLA: A Comparison Study
Authors:
Cornelius Steinbrink,
Arjen A. van der Meer,
Milos Cvetkovic,
Davood Babazadeh,
Sebastian Rohjans,
Peter Palensky,
Sebastian Lehnhoff
Abstract:
Evaluating new technological developments for energy systems is becoming more and more complex. The overall application environment is a continuously growing and interconnected cyber-physical system so that analytical assessment is practically impossible to realize. Consequently, new solutions must be evaluated in simulation studies. Due to the interdisciplinarity of the simulation scenarios, vari…
▽ More
Evaluating new technological developments for energy systems is becoming more and more complex. The overall application environment is a continuously growing and interconnected cyber-physical system so that analytical assessment is practically impossible to realize. Consequently, new solutions must be evaluated in simulation studies. Due to the interdisciplinarity of the simulation scenarios, various heterogeneous tools must be connected. This approach is known as co-simulation. During the last years, different approaches have been developed or adapted for applications in energy systems. In this paper, two co-simulation approaches are compared that follow generic, versatile concepts. The tool mosaik, which has been explicitly developed for the purpose of co-simulation in complex energy systems, is compared to the High Level Architecture (HLA), which possesses a domain-independent scope but is often employed in the energy domain. The comparison is twofold, considering the tools' conceptual architectures as well as results from the simulation of representative test cases. It suggests that mosaik may be the better choice for entry-level, prototypical co-simulation while HLA is more suited for complex and extensive studies.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
Validating Intelligent Power and Energy Systems - A Discussion of Educational Needs
Authors:
Panos Kotsampopoulos,
Nikos Hatziargyriou,
Thomas I. Strasser,
Cyndi Moyo,
Sebastian Rohjans,
Cornelius Steinbrink,
Sebastian Lehnhoff,
Peter Palensky,
Arjen A. van der Meer,
Daniel Esteban Morales Bondy,
Kai Heussen,
Mihai Calin,
Ata Khavari,
Maria Sosnina,
J. Emilio Rodriguez,
Graeme M. Burt
Abstract:
Traditional power systems education and training is flanked by the demand for coping with the rising complexity of energy systems, like the integration of renewable and distributed generation, communication, control and information technology. A broad understanding of these topics by the current/future researchers and engineers is becoming more and more necessary. This paper identifies educational…
▽ More
Traditional power systems education and training is flanked by the demand for coping with the rising complexity of energy systems, like the integration of renewable and distributed generation, communication, control and information technology. A broad understanding of these topics by the current/future researchers and engineers is becoming more and more necessary. This paper identifies educational and training needs addressing the higher complexity of intelligent energy systems. Education needs and requirements are discussed, such as the development of systems-oriented skills and cross-disciplinary learning. Education and training possibilities and necessary tools are described focusing on classroom but also on laboratory-based learning methods. In this context, experiences of using notebooks, co-simulation approaches, hardware-in-the-loop methods and remote labs experiments are discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
