Showing 1–17 of 17 results for author: van Oorschot, P C

ss2DNS: A Secure DNS Scheme in Stage 2

Authors: Ali Sadeghi Jahromi, AbdelRahman Abdou, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: The absence of security and privacy measures between DNS recursive resolvers and authoritative nameservers has been exploited by both on-path and off-path attackers. Although numerous security proposals have been introduced in practice and in the literature, they often face deployability barriers and/or lack a compelling set of security and privacy properties, resulting in limited adoption. We int… ▽ More The absence of security and privacy measures between DNS recursive resolvers and authoritative nameservers has been exploited by both on-path and off-path attackers. Although numerous security proposals have been introduced in practice and in the literature, they often face deployability barriers and/or lack a compelling set of security and privacy properties, resulting in limited adoption. We introduce ss2DNS, a novel DNS scheme designed to mitigate the security and privacy vulnerabilities in the resolution process between resolvers and authoritative nameservers, while preserving efficiency by maintaining a single round-trip. ss2DNS takes advantage of a hierarchical trust model that does not rely on entities external to DNS zones, and delegates nameserver replicas within each zone to serve zone data securely for short, renewable time intervals. This design enables real-time security properties for DNS messages without requiring the duplication of long-term private keys on replicas, thereby minimizing exposure to compromise. We implement a proof of concept of ss2DNS for evaluation and show that for server-side processing latency, resolution time, and CPU usage, ss2DNS is comparable to less-secure schemes but significantly outperforms DNS-over-TLS. △ Less

Submitted 25 June, 2025; v1 submitted 1 August, 2024; originally announced August 2024.

Comments: 15 pages, 7 figures

Influences of Displaying Permission-related Information on Web Single Sign-On Login Decisions

Authors: Srivathsan G. Morkonda, Sonia Chiasson, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: Web users are increasingly presented with multiple login options, including password-based login and common web single sign-on (SSO) login options such as "Login with Google" and "Login with Facebook". There has been little focus in previous studies on how users choose from a list of login options and how to better inform users about privacy issues in web SSO systems. In this paper, we conducted a… ▽ More Web users are increasingly presented with multiple login options, including password-based login and common web single sign-on (SSO) login options such as "Login with Google" and "Login with Facebook". There has been little focus in previous studies on how users choose from a list of login options and how to better inform users about privacy issues in web SSO systems. In this paper, we conducted a 200-participant study to understand factors that influence participants' login decisions, and how they are affected by displaying permission differences across login options; permissions in SSO result in release of user personal information to third-party web sites through SSO identity providers. We compare and report on login decisions made by participants before and after viewing permission-related information, examine self-reported responses for reasons related to their login decisions, and report on the factors that motivated their choices. We find that usability preferences and inertia (habituation) were among the dominant factors influencing login decisions. After participants viewed permission-related information, many prioritised privacy over other factors, changing their login decisions to more privacy-friendly alternatives. Displaying permission-related information also influenced some participants to make tradeoffs between privacy and usability preferences. △ Less

Submitted 28 December, 2023; v1 submitted 24 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

A Close Look at a Systematic Method for Analyzing Sets of Security Advice

Authors: David Barrera, Christopher Bellman, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: We carry out a detailed analysis of the security advice coding method (SAcoding) of Barrera et al. (2021), which is designed to analyze security advice in the sense of measuring actionability and categorizing advice items as practices, policies, principles, or outcomes. The main part of our analysis explores the extent to which a second coder's assignment of codes to advice items agrees with that… ▽ More We carry out a detailed analysis of the security advice coding method (SAcoding) of Barrera et al. (2021), which is designed to analyze security advice in the sense of measuring actionability and categorizing advice items as practices, policies, principles, or outcomes. The main part of our analysis explores the extent to which a second coder's assignment of codes to advice items agrees with that of a first, for a dataset of 1013 security advice items nominally addressing Internet of Things devices. More broadly, we seek a deeper understanding of the soundness and utility of the SAcoding method, and the degree to which it meets the design goal of reducing subjectivity in assigning codes to security advice items. Our analysis results in suggestions for modifications to the coding tree methodology, and some recommendations. We believe the coding tree approach may be of interest for analysis of qualitative data beyond security advice datasets alone. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2023; v1 submitted 9 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

"Sign in with ... Privacy'': Timely Disclosure of Privacy Differences among Web SSO Login Options

Authors: Srivathsan G. Morkonda, Sonia Chiasson, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: The number of login options on web sites has increased since the introduction of web single sign-on (SSO) protocols. Web SSO services allow users to grant web sites or relying parties (RPs) access to their personal profile information from identity provider (IdP) accounts. Many RP sites fail to provide sufficient privacy-related information to allow users to make informed login decisions. Moreover… ▽ More The number of login options on web sites has increased since the introduction of web single sign-on (SSO) protocols. Web SSO services allow users to grant web sites or relying parties (RPs) access to their personal profile information from identity provider (IdP) accounts. Many RP sites fail to provide sufficient privacy-related information to allow users to make informed login decisions. Moreover, privacy differences in permission requests across login options are largely hidden from users and are time-consuming to manually extract and compare. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of popular RP implementations supporting three major IdP login options (Facebook, Google, and Apple) and categorize RPs in the top 500 sites into four client-side code patterns. Informed by these RP patterns, we design and implement SSOPrivateEye (SPEye), a browser extension prototype that extracts and displays to users permission request information from SSO login options in RPs covering the three IdPs. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2024; v1 submitted 9 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Security Best Practices: A Critical Analysis Using IoT as a Case Study

Authors: David Barrera, Christopher Bellman, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: Academic research has highlighted the failure of many Internet of Things (IoT) product manufacturers to follow accepted practices, while IoT security best practices have recently attracted considerable attention worldwide from industry and governments. Given current examples of security advice, confusion is evident from guidelines that conflate desired outcomes with security practices to achieve t… ▽ More Academic research has highlighted the failure of many Internet of Things (IoT) product manufacturers to follow accepted practices, while IoT security best practices have recently attracted considerable attention worldwide from industry and governments. Given current examples of security advice, confusion is evident from guidelines that conflate desired outcomes with security practices to achieve those outcomes. We explore a surprising lack of clarity, and void in the literature, on what (generically) best practice means, independent of identifying specific individual practices or highlighting failure to follow best practices. We consider categories of security advice, and analyze how they apply over the lifecycle of IoT devices. For concreteness in discussion, we use iterative inductive coding to code and systematically analyze a set of 1013 IoT security best practices, recommendations, and guidelines collated from industrial, government, and academic sources. Among our findings, of all analyzed items, 68% fail to meet our definition of an (actionable) practice, and 73% of all actionable advice relates to the software development lifecycle phase, highlighting the critical position of manufacturers and developers. We hope that our work provides a basis for the community to better understand best practices, identify and reach consensus on specific practices, and find ways to motivate relevant stakeholders to follow them. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Systematic Analysis and Comparison of Security Advice as Datasets

Authors: Christopher Bellman, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: A long list of documents have been offered as security advice, codes of practice, and security guidelines for building and using security products, including Internet of Things (IoT) devices. To date, little or no systematic analysis has been carried out on the advice datasets themselves. Towards addressing this, with IoT as a case study, we begin with an informal analysis of two documents offerin… ▽ More A long list of documents have been offered as security advice, codes of practice, and security guidelines for building and using security products, including Internet of Things (IoT) devices. To date, little or no systematic analysis has been carried out on the advice datasets themselves. Towards addressing this, with IoT as a case study, we begin with an informal analysis of two documents offering advice related to IoT security -- the ETSI Provisions and the UK DCMS Guidelines -- and then carry out what we believe is the first systematic analysis of these advice datasets. Our analysis explains in what ways the ETSI Provisions are a positive evolution of the UK DCMS Guidelines. We also suggest aspects of security advice warranting special attention by those offering security advice. Such parties may find the systematic analysis method, which categorizes advice into predefined categories, to be of general interest beyond IoT itself. △ Less

Submitted 14 November, 2022; v1 submitted 18 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Exploring Privacy Implications in OAuth Deployments

Authors: Srivathsan G. Morkonda, Paul C. van Oorschot, Sonia Chiasson

Abstract: Single sign-on authentication systems such as OAuth 2.0 are widely used in web services. They allow users to use accounts registered with major identity providers such as Google and Facebook to login on multiple services (relying parties). These services can both identify users and access a subset of the user's data stored with the provider. We empirically investigate the end-user privacy implicat… ▽ More Single sign-on authentication systems such as OAuth 2.0 are widely used in web services. They allow users to use accounts registered with major identity providers such as Google and Facebook to login on multiple services (relying parties). These services can both identify users and access a subset of the user's data stored with the provider. We empirically investigate the end-user privacy implications of OAuth 2.0 implementations in relying parties most visited around the world. We collect data on the use of OAuth-based logins in the Alexa Top 500 sites per country for five countries. We categorize user data made available by four identity providers (Google, Facebook, Apple and LinkedIn) and evaluate popular services accessing user data from the SSO platforms of these providers. Many services allow users to choose from multiple login options (with different identity providers). Our results reveal that services request different categories and amounts of personal data from different providers, with at least one choice undeniably more privacy-intrusive. These privacy choices (and their privacy implications) are highly invisible to users. Based on our analysis, we also identify areas which could improve user privacy and help users make informed decisions. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

A survey and analysis of TLS interception mechanisms and motivations

Authors: Xavier de Carné de Carnavalet, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: TLS is an end-to-end protocol designed to provide confidentiality and integrity guarantees that improve end-user security and privacy. While TLS helps defend against pervasive surveillance of intercepted unencrypted traffic, it also hinders several common beneficial operations typically performed by middleboxes on the network traffic. Consequently, various methods have been proposed that "bypass"… ▽ More TLS is an end-to-end protocol designed to provide confidentiality and integrity guarantees that improve end-user security and privacy. While TLS helps defend against pervasive surveillance of intercepted unencrypted traffic, it also hinders several common beneficial operations typically performed by middleboxes on the network traffic. Consequently, various methods have been proposed that "bypass" the confidentiality goals of TLS by playing with keys and certificates essentially in a man-in-the-middle solution, as well as new proposals that extend the protocol to accommodate third parties, delegation schemes to trusted middleboxes, and fine-grained control and verification mechanisms. We first review the use cases expecting plain HTTP traffic and discuss the extent to which TLS hinders these operations. We retain 19 scenarios where access to unencrypted traffic is still relevant and evaluate the incentives of the stakeholders involved. Second, we survey 30 schemes by which TLS no longer delivers end-to-end security, and by which the notion of an "end" changes, including caching middleboxes such as Content Delivery Networks. Finally, we compare each scheme based on deployability and security characteristics, and evaluate their compatibility with the stakeholders' incentives. Our analysis leads to a number of key findings, observations, and research questions that we believe will be of interest to practitioners, policy makers and researchers. △ Less

Submitted 27 December, 2022; v1 submitted 30 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: This paper will appear in ACM Computing Surveys

Best Practices for IoT Security: What Does That Even Mean?

Authors: Christopher Bellman, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: Best practices for Internet of Things (IoT) security have recently attracted considerable attention worldwide from industry and governments, while academic research has highlighted the failure of many IoT product manufacturers to follow accepted practices. We explore not the failure to follow best practices, but rather a surprising lack of understanding, and void in the literature, on what (generi… ▽ More Best practices for Internet of Things (IoT) security have recently attracted considerable attention worldwide from industry and governments, while academic research has highlighted the failure of many IoT product manufacturers to follow accepted practices. We explore not the failure to follow best practices, but rather a surprising lack of understanding, and void in the literature, on what (generically) "best practice" means, independent of meaningfully identifying specific individual practices. Confusion is evident from guidelines that conflate desired outcomes with security practices to achieve those outcomes. How do best practices, good practices, and standard practices differ? Or guidelines, recommendations, and requirements? Can something be a best practice if it is not actionable? We consider categories of best practices, and how they apply over the lifecycle of IoT devices. For concreteness in our discussion, we analyze and categorize a set of 1014 IoT security best practices, recommendations, and guidelines from industrial, government, and academic sources. As one example result, we find that about 70\% of these practices or guidelines relate to early IoT device lifecycle stages, highlighting the critical position of manufacturers in addressing the security issues in question. We hope that our work provides a basis for the community to build on in order to better understand best practices, identify and reach consensus on specific practices, and then find ways to motivate relevant stakeholders to follow them. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Secure Client and Server Geolocation Over the Internet

Authors: AbdelRahman Abdou, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: In this article, we provide a summary of recent efforts towards achieving Internet geolocation securely, \ie without allowing the entity being geolocated to cheat about its own geographic location. Cheating motivations arise from many factors, including impersonation (in the case locations are used to reinforce authentication), and gaining location-dependent benefits. In particular, we provide a t… ▽ More In this article, we provide a summary of recent efforts towards achieving Internet geolocation securely, \ie without allowing the entity being geolocated to cheat about its own geographic location. Cheating motivations arise from many factors, including impersonation (in the case locations are used to reinforce authentication), and gaining location-dependent benefits. In particular, we provide a technical overview of Client Presence Verification (CPV) and Server Location Verification (SLV)---two recently proposed techniques designed to verify the geographic locations of clients and servers in realtime over the Internet. Each technique addresses a wide range of adversarial tactics to manipulate geolocation, including the use of IP-hiding technologies like VPNs and anonymizers, as we now explain. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Baseline functionality for security and control of commodity IoT devices and domain-controlled device lifecycle management

Authors: Markus Miettinen, Paul C. van Oorschot, Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi

Abstract: The emerging Internet of Things (IoT) drastically increases the number of connected devices in homes, workplaces and smart city infrastructures. This drives a need for means to not only ensure confidentiality of device-related communications, but for device configuration and management---ensuring that only legitimate devices are granted privileges to a local domain, that only authorized agents hav… ▽ More The emerging Internet of Things (IoT) drastically increases the number of connected devices in homes, workplaces and smart city infrastructures. This drives a need for means to not only ensure confidentiality of device-related communications, but for device configuration and management---ensuring that only legitimate devices are granted privileges to a local domain, that only authorized agents have access to the device and data it holds, and that software updates are authentic. The need to support device on-boarding, ongoing device management and control, and secure decommissioning dictates a suite of key management services for both access control to devices, and access by devices to wireless infrastructure and networked resources. We identify this core functionality, and argue for the recognition of efficient and reliable key management support---both within IoT devices, and by a unifying external management platform---as a baseline requirement for an IoT world. We present a framework architecture to facilitate secure, flexible and convenient device management in commodity IoT scenarios, and offer an illustrative set of protocols as a base solution---not to promote specific solution details, but to highlight baseline functionality to help domain owners oversee deployments of large numbers of independent multi-vendor IoT devices. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

Comparative Analysis and Framework Evaluating Web Single Sign-On Systems

Authors: Furkan Alaca, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: We perform a comprehensive analysis and comparison of 14 web single sign-on (SSO) systems proposed and/or deployed over the last decade, including federated identity and credential/password management schemes. We identify common design properties and use them to develop a taxonomy for SSO schemes, highlighting the associated trade-offs in benefits (positive attributes) offered. We develop a framew… ▽ More We perform a comprehensive analysis and comparison of 14 web single sign-on (SSO) systems proposed and/or deployed over the last decade, including federated identity and credential/password management schemes. We identify common design properties and use them to develop a taxonomy for SSO schemes, highlighting the associated trade-offs in benefits (positive attributes) offered. We develop a framework to evaluate the schemes, in which we identify 14 security, usability, deployability, and privacy benefits. We also discuss how differences in priorities between users, service providers (SPs), and identity providers (IdPs) impact the design and deployment of SSO schemes. △ Less

Submitted 9 August, 2020; v1 submitted 30 April, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

SoK: Securing Email -- A Stakeholder-Based Analysis (Extended Version)

Authors: Jeremy Clark, P. C. van Oorschot, Scott Ruoti, Kent Seamons, Daniel Zappala

Abstract: While email is the most ubiquitous and interoperable form of online communication today, it was not conceived with strong security guarantees, and the ensuing security enhancements are, by contrast, lacking in both ubiquity and interoperability. This situation motivates our research. We begin by identifying a variety of stakeholders who have an interest in the current email system and in efforts t… ▽ More While email is the most ubiquitous and interoperable form of online communication today, it was not conceived with strong security guarantees, and the ensuing security enhancements are, by contrast, lacking in both ubiquity and interoperability. This situation motivates our research. We begin by identifying a variety of stakeholders who have an interest in the current email system and in efforts to provide secure solutions. We then use the tussle among stakeholders to explain the evolution of fragmented secure email solutions undertaken by industry, academia, and independent developers. We also evaluate the building blocks of secure email -- cryptographic primitives, key management schemes, and system designs -- to identify their support for stakeholder properties. From our analysis, we conclude that a one-size-fits-all solution is unlikely. Furthermore, we highlight that vulnerable users are not well served by current solutions, account for the failure of PGP, and argue that secure messaging, while complementary, is not a fully substitutable technology. △ Less

Submitted 22 October, 2021; v1 submitted 20 April, 2018; originally announced April 2018.

Comments: Extended version of paper published at Financial Cryptography 2021. Under submission at CSUR

Comparative Analysis and Framework Evaluating Mimicry-Resistant and Invisible Web Authentication Schemes

Authors: Furkan Alaca, AbdelRahman Abdou, Paul C. van Oorschot

Abstract: Many password alternatives for web authentication proposed over the years, despite having different designs and objectives, all predominantly rely on the knowledge of some secret. This motivates us, herein, to provide the first detailed exploration of the integration of a fundamentally different element of defense into the design of web authentication schemes: a mimicry-resistance dimension. We an… ▽ More Many password alternatives for web authentication proposed over the years, despite having different designs and objectives, all predominantly rely on the knowledge of some secret. This motivates us, herein, to provide the first detailed exploration of the integration of a fundamentally different element of defense into the design of web authentication schemes: a mimicry-resistance dimension. We analyze web authentication mechanisms with respect to new usability and security properties related to mimicry-resistance (augmenting the UDS framework), and in particular evaluate invisible techniques (those requiring neither user actions, nor awareness) that provide some mimicry-resistance (unlike those relying solely on static secrets), including device fingerprinting schemes, PUFs (physically unclonable functions), and a subset of Internet geolocation mechanisms. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2019; v1 submitted 4 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

A Framework and Comparative Analysis of Control Plane Security of SDN and Conventional Networks

Authors: AbdelRahman Abdou, Paul C. van Oorschot, Tao Wan

Abstract: Software defined networking implements the network control plane in an external entity, rather than in each individual device as in conventional networks. This architectural difference implies a different design for control functions necessary for essential network properties, e.g., loop prevention and link redundancy. We explore how such differences redefine the security weaknesses in the SDN con… ▽ More Software defined networking implements the network control plane in an external entity, rather than in each individual device as in conventional networks. This architectural difference implies a different design for control functions necessary for essential network properties, e.g., loop prevention and link redundancy. We explore how such differences redefine the security weaknesses in the SDN control plane and provide a framework for comparative analysis which focuses on essential network properties required by typical production networks. This enables analysis of how these properties are delivered by the control planes of SDN and conventional networks, and to compare security risks and mitigations. Despite the architectural difference, we find similar, but not identical, exposures in control plane security if both network paradigms provide the same network properties and are analyzed under the same threat model. However, defenses vary; SDN cannot depend on edge based filtering to protect its control plane, while this is arguably the primary defense in conventional networks. Our concrete security analysis suggests that a distributed SDN architecture that supports fault tolerance and consistency checks is important for SDN control plane security. Our analysis methodology may be of independent interest for future security analysis of SDN and conventional networks. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2017; v1 submitted 20 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

Server Location Verification and Server Location Pinning: Augmenting TLS Authentication

Authors: AbdelRahman Abdou, P. C. van Oorschot

Abstract: We introduce the first known mechanism providing realtime server location verification. Its uses include enhancing server authentication (e.g., augmenting TLS) by enabling browsers to automatically interpret server location information. We describe the design of this new measurement-based technique, Server Location Verification (SLV), and evaluate it using PlanetLab. We explain how SLV is compatib… ▽ More We introduce the first known mechanism providing realtime server location verification. Its uses include enhancing server authentication (e.g., augmenting TLS) by enabling browsers to automatically interpret server location information. We describe the design of this new measurement-based technique, Server Location Verification (SLV), and evaluate it using PlanetLab. We explain how SLV is compatible with the increasing trends of geographically distributed content dissemination over the Internet, without causing any new interoperability conflicts. Additionally, we introduce the notion of (verifiable) "server location pinning" within TLS (conceptually similar to certificate pinning) to support SLV, and evaluate their combined impact using a server-authentication evaluation framework. The results affirm the addition of new security benefits to the existing SSL/TLS-based authentication mechanisms. We implement SLV through a location verification service, the simplest version of which requires no server-side changes. We also implement a simple browser extension that interacts seamlessly with the verification infrastructure to obtain realtime server location-verification results. △ Less

Submitted 16 August, 2016; v1 submitted 13 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

Comments: 14 pages, 4 figures

Three-Way Dissection of a Game-CAPTCHA: Automated Attacks, Relay Attacks, and Usability

Authors: Manar Mohamed, Niharika Sachdeva, Michael Georgescu, Song Gao, Nitesh Saxena, Chengcui Zhang, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru, Paul C. van Oorschot, Wei-Bang Chen

Abstract: Existing captcha solutions on the Internet are a major source of user frustration. Game captchas are an interesting and, to date, little-studied approach claiming to make captcha solving a fun activity for the users. One broad form of such captchas -- called Dynamic Cognitive Game (DCG) captchas -- challenge the user to perform a game-like cognitive task interacting with a series of dynamic images… ▽ More Existing captcha solutions on the Internet are a major source of user frustration. Game captchas are an interesting and, to date, little-studied approach claiming to make captcha solving a fun activity for the users. One broad form of such captchas -- called Dynamic Cognitive Game (DCG) captchas -- challenge the user to perform a game-like cognitive task interacting with a series of dynamic images. We pursue a comprehensive analysis of a representative category of DCG captchas. We formalize, design and implement such captchas, and dissect them across: (1) fully automated attacks, (2) human-solver relay attacks, and (3) usability. Our results suggest that the studied DCG captchas exhibit high usability and, unlike other known captchas, offer some resistance to relay attacks, but they are also vulnerable to our novel dictionary-based automated attack. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2013; originally announced October 2013.

Comments: 16 pages, 10 figures